Emory University, Atlanta, GA 30329, USA.
Dev Psychopathol. 2011 Nov;23(4):1001-16. doi: 10.1017/S0954579411000460.
The mechanisms through which early life stress leads to psychopathology are thought to involve allostatic load, the "wear and tear" an organism is subjected to as a consequence of sustained elevated levels of glucocorticoids caused by repeated/prolonged stress activations. The allostatic load model described this phenomenon, but has been criticized as inadequate to explain alterations associated with early adverse experience in some systems, including behavior, which cannot be entirely explained from an energy balance perspective. The reactive scope model has been more recently proposed and focuses less on energy balance and more on dynamic ranges of physiological and behavioral mediators. In this review we examine the mechanisms underlying the behavioral consequences of early life stress in the context of both these models. We focus on adverse experiences that involve mother-infant relationship disruption, and dissect those mechanisms involving maternal care as a regulator of development of neural circuits that control emotional and social behaviors in the offspring. We also discuss the evolutionary purpose of the plasticity in behavioral development, which has a clear adaptive value in a changing environment.
早期生活压力导致精神病理学的机制被认为涉及到适应负荷,即生物体由于持续升高的糖皮质激素水平而导致的“磨损”,这是由于反复/长期的应激激活引起的。适应负荷模型描述了这一现象,但它被批评为不足以解释某些系统中与早期不良经历相关的改变,包括行为,而从能量平衡的角度并不能完全解释这些改变。最近提出了反应范围模型,该模型较少关注能量平衡,而更多地关注生理和行为介质的动态范围。在这篇综述中,我们在这两个模型的背景下研究了早期生活压力对行为后果的机制。我们专注于涉及母婴关系中断的不良经历,并剖析了那些涉及母性关怀的机制,母性关怀是调节控制后代情绪和社交行为的神经回路发育的关键因素。我们还讨论了行为发展中可塑性的进化目的,这在不断变化的环境中具有明显的适应性价值。