Department of Health Management and Policy, College of Public Health, University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa, USA.
BMC Geriatr. 2011 Oct 21;11:65. doi: 10.1186/1471-2318-11-65.
It is well known that older adults figure prominently in the use of emergency departments (ED) across the United States. Previous research has differentiated ED visits by levels of clinical severity and found health status and other individual characteristics distinguished severe from non-severe visits. In this research, we classified older adults into population groups that persistently present with severe, non-severe, or indeterminate patterns of ED episodes. We then contrasted the three groups using a comprehensive set of covariates.
Using a unique dataset linking individual characteristics with Medicare claims for calendar years 1991-2007, we identified patterns of ED use among the large, nationally representative AHEAD sample consisting of 5,510 older adults. We then classified one group of older adults who persistently presented to the ED with clinically severe episodes and another group who persistently presented to the ED with non-severe episodes. These two groups were contrasted using logistic regression, and then contrasted against a third group with a persistent pattern of ED episodes with indeterminate levels of severity using multinomial logistic regression. Variable selection was based on Andersen's behavioral model of health services use and featured clinical status, demographic and socioeconomic characteristics, health behaviors, health service use patterns, local health care supply, and other contextual effects.
We identified 948 individuals (17.2% of the entire sample) who presented a pattern in which their ED episodes were typically defined as severe and 1,076 individuals (19.5%) who typically presented with non-severe episodes. Individuals who persistently presented to the ED with severe episodes were more likely to be older (AOR 1.52), men (AOR 1.28), current smokers (AOR 1.60), experience diabetes (AOR (AOR 1.80), heart disease (AOR 1.70), hypertension (AOR 1.32) and have a greater amount of morbidity (AOR 1.48) than those who persistently presented to the ED with non-severe episodes. When contrasted with 1,177 individuals with a persistent pattern of indeterminate severity ED use, persons with severe patterns were older (AOR 1.36), more likely to be obese (AOR 1.36), and experience heart disease (AOR 1.49) and hypertension (AOR 1.36) while persons with non-severe patterns were less likely to smoke (AOR 0.63) and have diabetes (AOR 0.67) or lung disease (AOR 0.58).
We distinguished three large, readily identifiable groups of older adults which figure prominently in the use of EDs across the United States. Our results suggest that one group affects the general capacity of the ED to provide care as they persistently present with severe episodes requiring urgent staff attention and greater resource allocation. Another group persistently presents with non-severe episodes and creates a considerable share of the excess demand for ED care. Future research should determine how chronic disease management programs and varied co-payment obligations might impact the use of the ED by these two large and distinct groups of older adults with consistent ED use patterns.
众所周知,老年人在美国各地的急诊科(ED)使用中占有重要地位。先前的研究已经根据临床严重程度对 ED 就诊进行了区分,并发现健康状况和其他个体特征将严重程度与非严重程度就诊区分开来。在这项研究中,我们将老年人分为持续表现出严重、非严重或不确定 ED 发作模式的人群组。然后,我们使用一套全面的协变量来对比这三组。
使用一个独特的数据集,将个体特征与 1991-2007 年的医疗保险索赔联系起来,我们确定了由 AHEAD 样本中 5510 名老年人组成的大型全国代表性样本中 ED 使用的模式。然后,我们将一组持续出现临床严重发作的 ED 患者和另一组持续出现非严重发作的 ED 患者分类。这两组使用逻辑回归进行对比,然后使用多项逻辑回归与持续存在 ED 发作且严重程度不确定的第三组进行对比。变量选择基于安德森的卫生服务使用行为模型,并具有临床状况、人口统计学和社会经济特征、健康行为、卫生服务使用模式、当地卫生保健供应以及其他背景影响。
我们确定了 948 名(整个样本的 17.2%)患者表现出一种模式,他们的 ED 发作通常被定义为严重,1076 名(19.5%)患者通常表现为非严重发作。持续出现严重 ED 发作的患者更可能是老年人(AOR 1.52)、男性(AOR 1.28)、当前吸烟者(AOR 1.60)、患有糖尿病(AOR 1.80)、心脏病(AOR 1.70)、高血压(AOR 1.32)和更多的发病(AOR 1.48)比那些持续出现非严重 ED 发作的患者。与 1177 名持续存在不确定严重程度 ED 使用模式的个体相比,具有严重模式的个体年龄更大(AOR 1.36)、更有可能肥胖(AOR 1.36)、患有心脏病(AOR 1.49)和高血压(AOR 1.36),而具有非严重模式的个体吸烟(AOR 0.63)和患有糖尿病(AOR 0.67)或肺部疾病(AOR 0.58)的可能性较小。
我们区分了三个在美国 ED 使用中占有重要地位的大型、易于识别的老年人群体。我们的研究结果表明,一类人群会影响 ED 提供护理的总体能力,因为他们持续出现需要紧急工作人员关注和更多资源分配的严重发作。另一组则持续出现非严重发作,导致对 ED 护理的过度需求增加。未来的研究应该确定慢性病管理计划和不同的共同支付义务如何影响这两个具有持续 ED 使用模式的大型和不同的老年人群体对 ED 的使用。