Cardiology Division, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts 02114, USA.
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2011 Oct 25;58(18):1881-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2011.03.072.
The aim of this study was to evaluate whether chronic heart failure (HF) therapy guided by concentrations of amino-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) is superior to standard of care (SOC) management.
It is unclear whether standard HF treatment plus a goal of reducing NT-proBNP concentrations improves outcomes compared with standard management alone.
In a prospective single-center trial, 151 subjects with HF due to left ventricular (LV) systolic dysfunction were randomized to receive either standard HF care plus a goal to reduce NT-proBNP concentrations ≤1,000 pg/ml or SOC management. The primary endpoint was total cardiovascular events between groups compared using generalized estimating equations. Secondary endpoints included effects of NT-proBNP-guided care on patient quality of life as well as cardiac structure and function, assessed with echocardiography.
Through a mean follow-up period of 10 ± 3 months, a significant reduction in the primary endpoint of total cardiovascular events was seen in the NT-proBNP arm compared with SOC (58 events vs. 100 events, p = 0.009; logistic odds for events 0.44, p = 0.02); Kaplan-Meier curves demonstrated significant differences in time to first event, favoring NT-proBNP-guided care (p = 0.03). No age interaction was found, with elderly patients benefitting similarly from NT-proBNP-guided care as younger subjects. Compared with SOC, NT-proBNP-guided patients had greater improvements in quality of life, demonstrated greater relative improvements in LV ejection fraction, and had more significant improvements in both LV end-systolic and -diastolic volume indexes.
In patients with HF due to LV systolic dysfunction, NT-proBNP-guided therapy was superior to SOC, with reduced event rates, improved quality of life, and favorable effects on cardiac remodeling. (Use of NT-proBNP Testing to Guide Heart Failure Therapy in the Outpatient Setting; NCT00351390).
本研究旨在评估慢性心力衰竭(HF)治疗是否优于标准治疗(SOC)管理。
目前尚不清楚与单独标准管理相比,标准 HF 治疗加降低氨基末端 pro-B 型利钠肽(NT-proBNP)浓度的目标是否能改善结局。
在一项前瞻性单中心试验中,151 名因左心室(LV)收缩功能障碍导致 HF 的患者被随机分为接受标准 HF 治疗加降低 NT-proBNP 浓度至≤1000pg/ml 的目标或 SOC 治疗。使用广义估计方程比较两组之间的主要终点——总心血管事件。次要终点包括 NT-proBNP 指导的护理对患者生活质量以及心脏结构和功能的影响,通过超声心动图进行评估。
在平均 10±3 个月的随访期间,与 SOC 相比,NT-proBNP 组主要终点(总心血管事件)显著降低(58 例事件 vs. 100 例事件,p=0.009;事件发生的逻辑优势比为 0.44,p=0.02);Kaplan-Meier 曲线显示首次事件时间有显著差异,NT-proBNP 指导的护理更有利(p=0.03)。未发现年龄的交互作用,老年患者与年轻患者一样从 NT-proBNP 指导的护理中获益。与 SOC 相比,NT-proBNP 指导的患者生活质量有更大的改善,LV 射血分数的相对改善更大,LV 收缩末期和舒张末期容积指数的改善更明显。
在因 LV 收缩功能障碍导致 HF 的患者中,与 SOC 相比,NT-proBNP 指导的治疗降低了事件发生率,改善了生活质量,并对心脏重构有有利影响。(使用 NT-proBNP 检测指导门诊 HF 治疗;NCT00351390)。