Ayuya J M, Williams J F
Immunology. 1979 Apr;36(4):825-34.
Rats immunized with products and saline-soluble antigens derived from were found to be significantly protected against challenge infection. Oral and intraperitoneal administration of antigen solutions alone were effective in stimulating resistance. Adjuvants, however, were required for successful immunization when the antigens were injected intramuscularly. and aluminium hydroxide were able to improve markedly the protective effects of antigens given parenterally by either route, but Freund's complete adjuvant (FCA) was not effective as an adjuvant in this system. Reaginic antibodies to parasite antigens were detected in the sera of rats immunized with parasite antigens and or Al(OH), but none were detected in those given antigens incorporated in FCA. The possible role of reaginic antibodies in immunity to is discussed. A single dose of antigen given orally produced significant protection. Increasing the number of daily doses of antigen administered orally enhanced the degree of protection to a limited but significant extent. There did not appear, however, to be any advantage to giving large doses (> 1 mg protein) of antigen, or extending the immunizing schedule over several weeks. Reaginic antibodies were not detected in the sera of rats immunized orally, but these animals were resistant to both oral and intravenous challenge infection with parasites. These observations are discussed in relation to the phenomena of immune exclusion of antigen by the gut, and gastrointestinally induced systemic tolerance with respect to IgE production. Sera from rats immunized by all routes were found to be ineffective in conferring resistance upon recipients when given at the dose of 1 ml/rat. Furthermore, sera from donors vaccinated intramuscularly with saline soluble antigens and increased the susceptibility of recipient rats to infection with . This is in sharp contrast to our previous experience in which we have shown that sera from rats with an active infection are highly effective in passive transfer. Possible reasons for these observations are discussed. The requirements for adequately controlled immunization procedures to assess the contributory effects of adjuvant type and the route of antigen inoculation in immunizing against taeniid infections are emphasized in the discussion.
用源自[具体来源未提及]的产物和盐溶性抗原免疫的大鼠,被发现对攻击感染有显著的保护作用。单独口服和腹腔注射抗原溶液能有效刺激抵抗力。然而,当抗原通过肌肉注射时,成功免疫需要佐剂。[具体物质未提及]和氢氧化铝能够显著提高通过任何一种途径经肠胃外给予的抗原的保护作用,但弗氏完全佐剂(FCA)在该系统中作为佐剂无效。在用寄生虫抗原和[具体物质未提及]或氢氧化铝免疫的大鼠血清中检测到了针对寄生虫抗原的反应素抗体,但在给予含FCA的抗原的大鼠血清中未检测到。讨论了反应素抗体在对[具体寄生虫未提及]免疫中的可能作用。口服单剂量抗原产生了显著的保护作用。增加口服抗原的每日剂量数量在有限但显著的程度上增强了保护程度。然而,给予大剂量(>1毫克蛋白质)抗原或在数周内延长免疫程序似乎没有任何优势。在口服免疫的大鼠血清中未检测到反应素抗体,但这些动物对寄生虫的口服和静脉攻击感染均有抵抗力。结合肠道对抗原的免疫排斥现象以及胃肠道诱导的关于IgE产生的全身耐受性来讨论这些观察结果。发现通过所有途径免疫的大鼠血清以1毫升/大鼠的剂量给予接受者时,在赋予抵抗力方面无效。此外,用盐溶性抗原和[具体物质未提及]进行肌肉注射免疫的供体大鼠的血清增加了受体大鼠对[具体寄生虫未提及]感染的易感性。这与我们之前的经验形成鲜明对比,在之前的经验中我们表明来自有活动性感染的大鼠的血清在被动转移中非常有效。讨论了这些观察结果的可能原因。讨论中强调了充分控制免疫程序以评估佐剂类型和抗原接种途径在对带绦虫感染免疫中的贡献作用的要求。