Callé N, Plainfossé C, Georget P, Sénémeaud C, Rasonglès P
Établissement français du sang Normandie, 1, rue Pr.-Rousselot, 14000 Caen, France.
Transfus Clin Biol. 2011 Dec;18(5-6):565-9. doi: 10.1016/j.tracli.2011.04.005. Epub 2011 Oct 22.
The supply of blood cell products required from the National French Blood Institute (Établissement français du sang [EFS]) relies upon regular blood donors. Contact with donors, tailored to individuals as much as possible, helps them to donate on a regular basis. To communicate as efficiently as possible, the content of the mailings has to be adapted to individuals, each according to his/her motivation and the way he or she perceives and processes the information. Within the context of a research program conducted with the Psychology Department of the University of Caen Basse-Normandie, persuasive theoretical models from social psychology have been tested. These models allow adapting messages according to various combinations of types of information processing, motivations and content of the messages. Different types of mailing invitations have been sent to 1987 donors from the Normandy database, requesting them to donate blood. Every experimental letter worked better than the standard EFS letter (which was used as the "control" letter) in terms of effective blood donation after reception of the letter. Some of the letters are more efficient in motivating donors than others. When the systematic type of processing (deep and thorough processing) is activated it appears important to supply elaborate content. On the contrary, when a heuristic type of processing (fast and superficial) is activated, adaptation of the content is less essential. Last but not least, the nearness of the last blood donation plays a key role.
法国国家血液机构(法国血液中心[EFS])所需血细胞产品的供应依赖于定期献血者。尽可能针对个体与献血者进行沟通,有助于他们定期献血。为了实现尽可能高效的沟通,邮件内容必须根据个体情况进行调整,每个人根据其动机以及对信息的感知和处理方式而定。在与卡昂诺曼底大学心理学系合作开展的一项研究项目中,对社会心理学中的说服理论模型进行了测试。这些模型能够根据信息处理类型、动机和信息内容的不同组合来调整信息。已向诺曼底数据库中的1987名献血者发送了不同类型的邮寄邀请,请求他们献血。在收到信件后的实际献血方面,每封实验信件都比法国血液中心的标准信件(用作“对照”信件)效果更好。其中一些信件在激励献血者方面比其他信件更有效。当激活系统性处理类型(深入且全面的处理)时,提供详尽内容似乎很重要。相反,当激活启发式处理类型(快速且表面的)时,内容的调整就不那么重要了。最后但同样重要的是,上一次献血的时间间隔起着关键作用。