Department of Orthopaedics, Yijishan Hospital, Wuhu, China.
Orthop Surg. 2011 Nov;3(4):247-52. doi: 10.1111/j.1757-7861.2011.00154.x.
To comparatively assess the clinical outcome of modified unilateral percutaneous vertebroplasty for the treatment of osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures.
The clinical outcome and incidence of cement extrusion in a consecutive group of 70 patients at our institution between December 2005 and December 2008 was retrospectively reviewed. Thirty-five patients were randomly distributed to modified percutaneous vertebroplasty (Group A) and 35 to traditional percutaneous vertebroplasty (Group B). A visual analog scale (VAS) was used on the first post-operative day and 1 year later to assess the severity of pain before and after vertebroplasty. The incidence of cement extrusion on CT scan was also compared between the two groups.
The treatment was successful in all seventy patients. The incidence of cement extrusion was 14.29% (5/35 patients) in group A, and 37.12% (13/35 patients) in group B, this difference being statistically significant (P < 0.05). No patients had serious complications. Complete pain relief was achieved in 50 patients, and significant relief in the other 20 (20/70 patients). There was no statistically significant difference between Groups A and B.
Modified percutaneous vertebroplasty enhances the accuracy of cement injection into the center of the vertebral body, increasing the safety of the procedure with no increase in cost. It is a safer and more easily performed technique for treating patients with osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures than traditional percutaneous vertebroplasty.
比较改良单侧经皮椎体成形术治疗骨质疏松性椎体压缩骨折的临床疗效。
回顾性分析 2005 年 12 月至 2008 年 12 月我院连续 70 例患者的临床疗效和骨水泥渗漏发生率。将 35 例患者随机分为改良经皮椎体成形术(A 组)和传统经皮椎体成形术(B 组)。术后第 1 天和 1 年分别采用视觉模拟评分(VAS)评估椎体成形术前后疼痛的严重程度。比较两组 CT 扫描的骨水泥渗漏发生率。
70 例患者治疗均成功。A 组骨水泥渗漏发生率为 14.29%(5/35 例),B 组为 37.12%(13/35 例),差异有统计学意义(P < 0.05)。两组均无严重并发症。50 例患者完全缓解疼痛,20 例患者明显缓解疼痛(70 例患者中 20 例)。A 组与 B 组之间差异无统计学意义。
改良经皮椎体成形术可提高骨水泥在椎体中心的注射准确性,增加手术安全性,且不增加费用。与传统经皮椎体成形术相比,治疗骨质疏松性椎体压缩骨折更安全、更容易。