Department of Neurology, Medical University Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria.
Mov Disord. 2011 Oct;26 Suppl 3(0 3):S42-80. doi: 10.1002/mds.23884.
The Movement Disorder Society (MDS) Task Force on Evidence-Based Medicine (EBM) Review of Treatments for Parkinson's Disease (PD) was first published in 2002 and was updated in 2005 to cover clinical trial data up to January 2004 with the focus on motor symptoms of PD. In this revised version the MDS task force decided it was necessary to extend the review to non-motor symptoms. The objective of this work was to update previous EBM reviews on treatments for PD with a focus on non-motor symptoms. Level-I (randomized controlled trial, RCT) reports of pharmacological and nonpharmacological interventions for the non-motor symptoms of PD, published as full articles in English between January 2002 and December 2010 were reviewed. Criteria for inclusion and ranking followed the original program outline and adhered to EBM methodology. For efficacy conclusions, treatments were designated: efficacious, likely efficacious, unlikely efficacious, non-efficacious, or insufficient evidence. Safety data were catalogued and reviewed. Based on the combined efficacy and safety assessment, Implications for clinical practice were determined using the following designations: clinically useful, possibly useful, investigational, unlikely useful, and not useful. Fifty-four new studies qualified for efficacy review while several other studies covered safety issues. Updated and new efficacy conclusions were made for all indications. The treatments that are efficacious for the management of the different non-motor symptoms are as follows: pramipexole for the treatment of depressive symptoms, clozapine for the treatment of psychosis, rivastigmine for the treatment of dementia, and botulinum toxin A (BTX-A) and BTX-B as well as glycopyrrolate for the treatment of sialorrhea. The practical implications for these treatments, except for glycopyrrolate, are that they are clinically useful. Since there is insufficient evidence of glycopyrrolate for the treatment of sialorrhea exceeding 1 week, the practice implication is that it is possibly useful. The treatments that are likely efficacious for the management of the different non-motor symptoms are as follows: the tricyclic antidepressants nortriptyline and desipramine for the treatment of depression or depressive symptoms and macrogol for the treatment of constipation. The practice implications for these treatments are possibly useful. For most of the other interventions there is insufficient evidence to make adequate conclusions on their efficacy. This includes the tricyclic antidepressant amitriptyline, all selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) reviewed (paroxetine, citalopram, sertraline, and fluoxetine), the newer antidepressants atomoxetine and nefazodone, pergolide, Ω-3 fatty acids as well as repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) for the treatment of depression or depressive symptoms; methylphenidate and modafinil for the treatment of fatigue; amantadine for the treatment of pathological gambling; donepezil, galantamine, and memantine for the treatment of dementia; quetiapine for the treatment of psychosis; fludrocortisone and domperidone for the treatment of orthostatic hypotension; sildenafil for the treatment of erectile dysfunction, ipratropium bromide spray for the treatment of sialorrhea; levodopa/carbidopa controlled release (CR), pergolide, eszopiclone, melatonin 3 to 5 mg and melatonin 50 mg for the treatment of insomnia and modafinil for the treatment of excessive daytime sleepiness. Due to safety issues the practice implication is that pergolide and nefazodone are not useful for the above-mentioned indications. Due to safety issues, olanzapine remains not useful for the treatment of psychosis. As none of the studies exceeded a duration of 6 months, the recommendations given are for the short-term management of the different non-motor symptoms. There were no RCTs that met inclusion criteria for the treatment of anxiety disorders, apathy, medication-related impulse control disorders and related behaviors other than pathological gambling, rapid eye movement (REM) sleep behavior disorder (RBD), sweating, or urinary dysfunction. Therefore, there is insufficient evidence for the treatment of these indications. This EBM review of interventions for the non-motor symptoms of PD updates the field, but, because several RCTs are ongoing, a continual updating process is needed. Several interventions and indications still lack good quality evidence, and these gaps offer an opportunity for ongoing research. © 2011 Movement Disorder Society.
运动障碍协会 (MDS) 循证医学 (EBM) 工作组对治疗帕金森病 (PD) 的治疗方法的首次审查发表于 2002 年,并于 2005 年更新,以涵盖截至 2004 年 1 月的临床试验数据,重点是 PD 的运动症状。在这个修订版本中,MDS 工作组决定有必要将审查扩展到非运动症状。这项工作的目的是更新以前关于 PD 治疗的 EBM 综述,重点是非运动症状。对 2002 年 1 月至 2010 年 12 月期间以英文发表的、针对 PD 非运动症状的药理学和非药理学干预的一级 (随机对照试验,RCT) 报告进行了综述。纳入和分级标准遵循原始计划大纲,并遵循 EBM 方法学。对于疗效结论,治疗方法被指定为:有效、可能有效、可能无效、无效或证据不足。对安全性数据进行了编目和审查。根据综合疗效和安全性评估,使用以下指定确定对临床实践的影响:临床有用、可能有用、研究中、可能无用和无用。54 项新研究有资格进行疗效审查,而其他几项研究则涵盖了安全性问题。对所有适应症都做出了更新和新的疗效结论。用于管理不同非运动症状的有效治疗方法如下:普拉克索治疗抑郁症状,氯氮平治疗精神病,利伐斯的明治疗痴呆,以及肉毒杆菌毒素 A (BTX-A) 和 BTX-B 以及格隆溴铵治疗流涎。除了格隆溴铵治疗流涎超过 1 周外,这些治疗方法的实际影响是临床有用。用于管理不同非运动症状的可能有效的治疗方法如下:三环类抗抑郁药去甲替林和丙米嗪治疗抑郁或抑郁症状,以及聚乙二醇治疗便秘。这些治疗方法的实际影响可能是有用的。对于大多数其他干预措施,缺乏足够的证据来对其疗效做出充分的结论。这包括三环类抗抑郁药阿米替林、所有审查的选择性 5-羟色胺再摄取抑制剂 (SSRIs) (帕罗西汀、西酞普兰、舍曲林和氟西汀)、新型抗抑郁药阿托西汀和奈法唑酮、培高利特、ω-3 脂肪酸以及重复经颅磁刺激 (rTMS) 治疗抑郁或抑郁症状;哌甲酯和莫达非尼治疗疲劳;金刚烷胺治疗病理性赌博;多奈哌齐、加兰他敏和美金刚治疗痴呆;喹硫平治疗精神病;氟氢可的松和多潘立酮治疗直立性低血压;西地那非治疗勃起功能障碍,异丙托溴铵喷雾剂治疗流涎;左旋多巴/卡比多巴控释 (CR)、培高利特、eszopiclone、褪黑素 3 至 5mg 和褪黑素 50mg 治疗失眠和莫达非尼治疗白天过度嗜睡。由于安全性问题,实践影响是培高利特和奈法唑酮对于上述适应症是无用的。由于安全性问题,奥氮平仍然不适用于治疗精神病。由于没有一项研究的持续时间超过 6 个月,因此建议用于不同非运动症状的短期管理。没有 RCT 符合治疗焦虑障碍、冷漠、药物相关冲动控制障碍和除病理性赌博以外的相关行为、快速眼动 (REM) 睡眠行为障碍 (RBD)、出汗或尿失禁的纳入标准。因此,对于这些适应症缺乏足够的证据。这项对 PD 非运动症状治疗干预的 EBM 综述更新了这一领域,但由于正在进行几项 RCT,因此需要持续更新过程。几项干预措施和适应症仍然缺乏高质量的证据,这些差距为正在进行的研究提供了机会。© 2011 运动障碍协会。