Audiology Department, Royal Surrey County Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Guildford, UK.
Int J Audiol. 2012 Feb;51(2):103-7. doi: 10.3109/14992027.2011.609182. Epub 2011 Oct 24.
The aim of this study was to assess differences between real ear insertion gains (REIG) measured with the modified pressure concurrent equalization (MPCE) and modified pressure stored equalization (MPSE) methods for open fittings in a typical audiology patient population.
REIGs were compared for the two methods using a warble tone sweep at 65 dB SPL. The differences between the two methods at 0.25, 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 4 and 6 kHz were recorded.
Eighty-three ears of a consecutive sample of 48 candidates for open-fit hearing aids were included.
The mean difference between MPSE and MPCE REIGs was less than 1 dB at all frequencies. Analysis of variance showed that the main effect of method was not significant, and there was no significant interaction between method and frequency.
The results for the MPSE and MPCE methods did not differ significantly for the patients with mild-to-moderate hearing losses tested here, for whom REIGs were generally less than 20 dB. Further research is needed to identify the REIG values at which the differences between MPCE and MPSE methods become clinically significant.
本研究旨在评估在典型听力学患者群体中,开放式助听器中使用改良压力同时均衡(MPCE)和改良压力存储均衡(MPSE)方法测量的真耳插入增益(REIG)之间的差异。
使用 65dB SPL 的啁啾音扫频比较两种方法的 REIG。记录两种方法在 0.25、0.5、1、2、3、4 和 6kHz 处的差异。
连续 48 名开放式助听器候选者中的 83 只耳朵被纳入研究。
在所有频率下,MPSE 和 MPCE REIG 之间的平均差异小于 1dB。方差分析显示,方法的主要效应不显著,且方法与频率之间不存在显著的交互作用。
对于这里测试的轻度至中度听力损失患者,MPSE 和 MPCE 方法的结果没有显著差异,因为他们的 REIG 通常小于 20dB。需要进一步研究确定 MPCE 和 MPSE 方法之间的差异在哪些 REIG 值变得具有临床意义。