Suppr超能文献

经闭孔与单切口尿道中段迷你吊带治疗女性压力性尿失禁:术后早期疼痛及 3 年随访。

Transobturator vs single-incision suburethral mini-slings for treatment of female stress urinary incontinence: early postoperative pain and 3-year follow-up.

机构信息

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Western Galilee Hospital, Nahariya, Israel.

出版信息

J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2011 Nov-Dec;18(6):769-73. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2011.08.718.

Abstract

STUDY OBJECTIVE

To compare related pain and cure using the transobturator and single-incision suburethral mini-sling anti-incontinence operations.

DESIGN

Open, prospective, nonrandomized 2-armed study comparing 2 surgical procedures for treatment of female stress urinary incontinence (Canadian Task Force classification II-1).

SETTING

A university and a private hospital.

PATIENTS

One hundred sixty-two women with stress urinary incontinence underwent either a tension-free vaginal tape-obturator (TVT-O) or a single-incision (TVT-SECUR) suburethral or mid-urethral tape operation.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

Pain levels were estimated using a visual analog scale, and outcome using the Urinary Distress Inventory and the Incontinence Impact Questionnaire. Postoperative vaginal and thigh pain was transient, lasting for up to 2 weeks, and occurred significantly more frequently in the TVT-O group (32% vs 1% and 32% vs 0%, respectively). Dyspareunia was not self-limited, and occurred more frequently in the TVT-SECUR group (7.9% vs 0%). Cure rates were 86.9% in the TVT-O group and 90.9% in the TVT-SECUR group. Complication rates were similar in the 2 groups.

CONCLUSION

Both procedures were effective, with few adverse effects. In sexually inactive patients, the TVT-SECUR procedure may be preferable because thigh and vaginal pain is largely averted with this procedure. Sexually active patients might be better referred for the TVT-O procedure because it was not followed by dyspareunia in our series. Patient choice of surgical method rather than randomization weakened the strength of this study.

摘要

研究目的

比较经闭孔和单切口尿道下迷你吊带抗失禁手术的相关疼痛和治愈率。

设计

开放、前瞻性、非随机 2 臂研究,比较 2 种手术治疗女性压力性尿失禁(加拿大任务组分类 II-1)的方法。

设置

一所大学和一家私人医院。

患者

162 名患有压力性尿失禁的女性患者接受了经阴道无张力吊带-闭孔(TVT-O)或单切口(TVT-SECUR)尿道下或中尿道吊带手术。

测量和主要结果

疼痛程度采用视觉模拟量表评估,结局采用尿困扰量表和尿失禁影响问卷评估。术后阴道和大腿疼痛是短暂的,持续 2 周,TVT-O 组发生率明显更高(分别为 32%比 1%和 32%比 0%)。性交困难没有自行缓解,在 TVT-SECUR 组更常见(7.9%比 0%)。TVT-O 组治愈率为 86.9%,TVT-SECUR 组为 90.9%。2 组并发症发生率相似。

结论

两种手术均有效,不良影响少。对于无性生活的患者,TVT-SECUR 手术可能更为理想,因为该手术可避免大腿和阴道疼痛。对于有性生活的患者,TVT-O 手术可能更为合适,因为在我们的研究中,该手术不会引起性交困难。患者对手术方法的选择而非随机分组削弱了本研究的强度。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验