• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基因-环境过程将攻击行为、同伴侵害和师生关系联系起来。

Gene-environment processes linking aggression, peer victimization, and the teacher-child relationship.

机构信息

Department of Psychology, University of Quebec at Montreal, Montréal, QC, Canada.

出版信息

Child Dev. 2011 Nov-Dec;82(6):2021-36. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8624.2011.01644.x. Epub 2011 Oct 25.

DOI:10.1111/j.1467-8624.2011.01644.x
PMID:22026352
Abstract

Aggressive behavior in middle childhood is at least partly explained by genetic factors. Nevertheless, estimations of simple effects ignore possible gene-environment interactions (G × E) or gene-environment correlations (rGE) in the etiology of aggression. The present study aimed to simultaneously test for G × E and rGE processes between aggression, on the one hand, and peer victimization and the teacher-child relationship in school, on the other hand. The sample comprised 124 MZ pairs and 93 DZ pairs assessed in Grade 1 (mean age = 84.7 months). Consistent with rGE, children with a presumed genetic disposition for aggression were at an increased risk of peer victimization, whereas in line with G × E, a positive relationship with the teacher mitigated the genetically mediated expression of aggression.

摘要

儿童中期的攻击行为至少部分是由遗传因素解释的。然而,简单效应的估计忽略了攻击行为发生的可能的基因-环境相互作用(G×E)或基因-环境相关(rGE)。本研究旨在同时检验攻击行为与同伴侵害和学校师生关系之间的 G×E 和 rGE 过程。样本包括 124 对 MZ 双胞胎和 93 对 DZ 双胞胎,他们在一年级(平均年龄=84.7 个月)接受评估。与 rGE 一致,具有攻击行为遗传倾向的儿童遭受同伴侵害的风险增加,而与 G×E 一致的是,与教师的积极关系减轻了攻击行为的遗传表达。

相似文献

1
Gene-environment processes linking aggression, peer victimization, and the teacher-child relationship.基因-环境过程将攻击行为、同伴侵害和师生关系联系起来。
Child Dev. 2011 Nov-Dec;82(6):2021-36. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8624.2011.01644.x. Epub 2011 Oct 25.
2
Gene-environment interaction between peer victimization and child aggression.同伴侵害与儿童攻击行为之间的基因-环境相互作用。
Dev Psychopathol. 2008 Spring;20(2):455-71. doi: 10.1017/S0954579408000229.
3
Gene-environment interplay between peer rejection and depressive behavior in children.儿童同伴排斥与抑郁行为之间的基因-环境相互作用
J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2009 Aug;50(8):1009-17. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-7610.2009.02052.x. Epub 2009 May 26.
4
Do other people's plights matter? A genetically informed twin study of the role of social context in the link between peer victimization and children's aggression and depression symptoms.他人的困境重要吗?一项基于遗传信息的双胞胎研究,探讨了社会环境在同伴侵害与儿童攻击和抑郁症状之间关系中的作用。
Dev Psychol. 2013 Feb;49(2):327-40. doi: 10.1037/a0025665. Epub 2011 Oct 3.
5
Linkages between children's and their friends' social and physical aggression: evidence for a gene-environment interaction?儿童与其朋友的社交攻击和身体攻击之间的联系:基因-环境相互作用的证据?
Child Dev. 2008 Jan-Feb;79(1):13-29. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8624.2007.01108.x.
6
Gene-environment correlation linking aggression and peer victimization: do classroom behavioral norms matter?将攻击行为与同伴受欺负联系起来的基因-环境相关性:课堂行为规范重要吗?
J Abnorm Child Psychol. 2015 Jan;43(1):19-31. doi: 10.1007/s10802-013-9807-z.
7
A monozygotic twin difference study of friends' aggression and children's adjustment problems.同卵双胞胎对朋友的攻击行为与儿童适应问题的差异研究。
Child Dev. 2011 Mar-Apr;82(2):617-32. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8624.2010.01570.x. Epub 2011 Mar 9.
8
Prospective associations between peer victimization and aggression.同伴侵害与攻击行为的前瞻性关联。
Child Dev. 2010 Nov-Dec;81(6):1670-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8624.2010.01501.x.
9
Relational aggression, victimization, and adjustment during middle childhood.儿童中期的关系攻击、受害和适应。
Dev Psychopathol. 2013 Aug;25(3):801-15. doi: 10.1017/S0954579413000187.
10
Gene-environment processes linking peer victimization and physical health problems: a longitudinal twin study.基因-环境过程:连接同伴欺凌与身体健康问题的纵向双胞胎研究
J Pediatr Psychol. 2014 Jan-Feb;39(1):96-108. doi: 10.1093/jpepsy/jst078. Epub 2013 Oct 1.

引用本文的文献

1
Positive Teacher-Student Relationships Lead to Less Cyberbullying Perpetration: A Within-Person Perspective.积极的师生关系会减少网络欺凌行为:一种个体内部视角。
J Youth Adolesc. 2025 May;54(5):1221-1237. doi: 10.1007/s10964-024-02113-4. Epub 2024 Dec 26.
2
Reciprocal Relations Between Conflicted Student-teacher Relationship and Children's Behavior Problems: Within-person Analyses from Norway and the USA.师生冲突关系与儿童行为问题的相互关系:来自挪威和美国的个体内分析。
Res Child Adolesc Psychopathol. 2023 Mar;51(3):331-342. doi: 10.1007/s10802-022-00968-4. Epub 2022 Oct 27.
3
Childhood psychopathic traits and mental health outcomes in adolescence: compensatory and protective effects of positive relationships with parents and teachers.
童年期的精神病态特质与青少年期的心理健康结果:与父母和教师的积极关系的补偿和保护作用
Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2023 Aug;32(8):1403-1413. doi: 10.1007/s00787-022-01955-2. Epub 2022 Feb 5.
4
Themes and Theories Revisited: Perspectives on Processes in Family-Peer Relationships.主题与理论再探讨:家庭-同伴关系中的过程视角
Children (Basel). 2021 Jun 15;8(6):507. doi: 10.3390/children8060507.
5
Genotype-environment correlation by intervention effects underlying middle childhood peer rejection and associations with adolescent marijuana use.干预效应下的基因型-环境相关性,该效应是儿童中期同伴拒绝的基础,并与青少年大麻使用相关。
Dev Psychopathol. 2022 Feb;34(1):171-182. doi: 10.1017/S0954579420001066. Epub 2020 Dec 22.
6
Anxiety Sensitivity and Children's Risk for Both Internalizing Problems and Peer Victimization Experiences.焦虑敏感与儿童内化问题和同伴受害经历的风险。
Child Psychiatry Hum Dev. 2020 Apr;51(2):174-186. doi: 10.1007/s10578-019-00919-z.
7
Transactional Links Between Teacher-Student Relationships and Adolescent Rule-Breaking Behavior and Behavioral School Engagement: Moderating Role of a Dopaminergic Genetic Profile Score.师生关系与青少年违规行为及学校行为参与度之间的交易性联系:多巴胺能基因谱分数的调节作用
J Youth Adolesc. 2016 Jun;45(6):1226-44. doi: 10.1007/s10964-016-0466-6. Epub 2016 Mar 24.
8
Gene-environment correlation linking aggression and peer victimization: do classroom behavioral norms matter?将攻击行为与同伴受欺负联系起来的基因-环境相关性:课堂行为规范重要吗?
J Abnorm Child Psychol. 2015 Jan;43(1):19-31. doi: 10.1007/s10802-013-9807-z.