Suppr超能文献

有使用受控物质的病史与药物过量死亡风险。

A history of being prescribed controlled substances and risk of drug overdose death.

机构信息

Division of Unintentional Injury Prevention, National Center for Injury Prevention and Control, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.

出版信息

Pain Med. 2012 Jan;13(1):87-95. doi: 10.1111/j.1526-4637.2011.01260.x. Epub 2011 Oct 25.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The abuse of prescription drugs has increased dramatically since 1990. Persons who overdose on such drugs frequently consume large doses and visit multiple providers. The risk of fatal overdose for different patterns of use of opioid analgesics and sedative/hypnotics has not been fully quantified.

DESIGN

Matched case-control study. Cases were 300 persons who died of unintentional drug overdoses in New Mexico during 2006-2008, and controls were 5,993 patients identified through the state prescription monitoring program with matching 6-month exposure periods.

OUTCOME MEASURES

Death from drug overdose or death from opioid overdose. Exposures were demographic variables and characteristics of prescription history. Crude and adjusted odds ratios (AOR) were calculated.

RESULTS

Increased risk was associated with male sex (AOR 2.4, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.8-3.1), one or more sedative/hypnotic prescriptions (AOR 3.0, CI 2.2-4.2), greater age (AOR 1.3, CI 1.2-1.4 for each 10-year increment), number of prescriptions (AOR 1.1, CI 1.1-1.1 for each additional prescription), and a prescription for buprenorphine (AOR 9.5, CI 3.0-30.0), fentanyl (AOR 3.5, CI 1.7-7.0), hydromorphone (AOR 3.3, CI 1.4-7.5), methadone (AOR 4.9, CI 2.5-9.6), or oxycodone (AOR 1.9, CI 1.4-2.6). Patients receiving a daily average of >40 morphine milligram equivalents had an OR of 12.2 (CI 9.2-16.0).

CONCLUSIONS

Patients being prescribed opioid analgesics frequently or at high dosage face a substantial overdose risk. Prescription monitoring programs might be the best way for prescribers to know their patients' prescription histories and accurately assess overdose risk.

摘要

目的

自 1990 年以来,处方药物滥用急剧增加。过量服用此类药物的人经常服用大剂量药物并多次就诊。不同阿片类镇痛药和镇静催眠药使用模式下的致命药物过量风险尚未完全量化。

设计

配对病例对照研究。病例组为 2006-2008 年期间新墨西哥州意外药物过量死亡的 300 人,对照组为通过州处方监测计划确定的 5993 名患者,具有 6 个月的匹配暴露期。

结果

与男性(比值比[OR]2.4,95%置信区间[CI]1.8-3.1)、一个或多个镇静催眠药处方(OR 3.0,CI 2.2-4.2)、年龄较大(OR 1.3,CI 每增加 10 岁增加 1.2-1.4)、处方数量(OR 1.1,CI 每增加一张处方增加 1.1-1.1)、丁丙诺啡(OR 9.5,CI 3.0-30.0)、芬太尼(OR 3.5,CI 1.7-7.0)、氢吗啡酮(OR 3.3,CI 1.4-7.5)、美沙酮(OR 4.9,CI 2.5-9.6)或羟考酮(OR 1.9,CI 1.4-2.6)处方相关。接受>40 吗啡毫克当量/天的患者的 OR 为 12.2(CI 9.2-16.0)。

结论

经常或高剂量开阿片类镇痛药的患者面临着很大的药物过量风险。处方监测计划可能是医生了解患者处方史并准确评估药物过量风险的最佳方式。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验