Section of Hepatology, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Colorado Denver, Aurora, CO 80045, USA.
Hepatology. 2012 Apr;55(4):1019-29. doi: 10.1002/hep.24752. Epub 2012 Mar 1.
Risk for future clinical outcomes is proportional to the severity of liver disease in patients with chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV). We measured disease severity by quantitative liver function tests (QLFTs) to determine cutoffs for QLFTs that identified patients who were at low and high risk for a clinical outcome. Two hundred and twenty-seven participants in the Hepatitis C Antiviral Long-term Treatment Against Cirrhosis (HALT-C) Trial underwent baseline QLFTs and were followed for a median of 5.5 years for clinical outcomes. QLFTs were repeated in 196 patients at month 24 and in 165 patients at month 48. Caffeine elimination rate (k(elim)), antipyrine (AP) clearance (Cl), MEGX concentration, methionine breath test (MBT), galactose elimination capacity (GEC), dual cholate (CA) clearances and shunt, perfused hepatic mass (PHM), and liver and spleen volumes (by single-photon emission computed tomography) were measured. Baseline QLFTs were significantly worse (P = 0.0017 to P < 0.0001) and spleen volumes were larger (P < 0.0001) in the 54 patients who subsequently experienced clinical outcomes. QLFT cutoffs that characterized patients as "low" and "high risk" for clinical outcome yielded hazard ratios ranging from 2.21 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.29-3.78) for GEC to 6.52 (95% CI: 3.63-11.71) for CA clearance after oral administration (Cl(oral)). QLFTs independently predicted outcome in models with Ishak fibrosis score, platelet count, and standard laboratory tests. In serial studies, patients with high-risk results for CA Cl(oral) or PHM had a nearly 15-fold increase in risk for clinical outcome. Less than 5% of patients with "low risk" QLFTs experienced a clinical outcome.
QLFTs independently predict risk for future clinical outcomes. By improving risk assessment, QLFTs could enhance the noninvasive monitoring, counseling, and management of patients with chronic HCV.
在慢性丙型肝炎病毒(HCV)感染患者中,未来临床结局的风险与肝脏疾病的严重程度成正比。我们通过定量肝功能检测(QLFT)来衡量疾病严重程度,以确定 QLFT 的临界值,从而识别出低危和高危临床结局的患者。HALT-C 试验中的 227 名参与者接受了基线 QLFT 检测,并随访中位数为 5.5 年以观察临床结局。196 名患者在第 24 个月和 165 名患者在第 48 个月重复进行了 QLFT 检测。检测了咖啡因消除率(k(elim))、安替比林(AP)清除率(Cl)、MEGX 浓度、蛋氨酸呼气试验(MBT)、半乳糖消除能力(GEC)、双重胆酸盐(CA)清除率和分流、灌注肝质量(PHM)以及肝脾体积(通过单光子发射计算机断层扫描)。随后发生临床结局的 54 名患者的基线 QLFT 显著更差(P=0.0017 至 P<0.0001),且脾脏体积更大(P<0.0001)。将患者分为“低危”和“高危”临床结局的 QLFT 临界值,其风险比范围为 GEC 的 2.21(95%置信区间[CI]:1.29-3.78)到 CA 口服清除率(Cl(oral))的 6.52(95%CI:3.63-11.71)。在包含 Ishak 纤维化评分、血小板计数和标准实验室检测的模型中,QLFT 独立预测结局。在系列研究中,CA Cl(oral)或 PHM 高危结果的患者发生临床结局的风险增加近 15 倍。不到 5%的低危 QLFT 患者出现临床结局。
QLFT 独立预测未来临床结局的风险。通过改善风险评估,QLFT 可以增强对慢性 HCV 患者的非侵入性监测、咨询和管理。