Smolensky M H, Reinberg A
University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston School of Public Health 77225.
Occup Med. 1990 Apr-Jun;5(2):239-72.
In this chapter, the topic of medical chronobiology has been presented. Emphasis has been placed on issues related to clinical and occupational medicine. Results of initial studies conducted primarily by clinical pathologists indicate that the results of several commonly ordered diagnostic tests are influenced in a significant way according to the circadian time when samplings or tests are conducted. In addition, the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of medications can vary significantly according to their administration time. Indeed, the safety as well as efficacy of certain medications or dosage forms are circadian time dependent. A new thrust in the clinic is the application of chronotherapeutics to maximize the effectiveness and safety of medications. For the occupational health practitioner, the topic of medical chronobiology offers new perspectives to better address common problems experienced in clinical occupational medicine. First, the utilization of time-qualified (for circadian rhythmicity) reference values serves to differentiate with greater precision normal from unusual test findings; for example, among those arising during the pre-employment and scheduled follow-up physical examinations. Second, it provides better insight into the basis for the biological intolerance to rotating shiftwork. Too often, employee complaints of shiftwork intolerance are met with skepticism by members of the management and/or medical staff. The phenomenon of biological intolerance to rotating shiftwork is real. It has only been during the past decade that shiftwork intolerance has been demonstrated to have a chronobiologic basis. It seems that persons who possess a weak circadian time structure, that is, rather low-amplitude bioperiodicities, are more prone to develop biological intolerance to shiftwork later in life. Those endowed with a strong (high-amplitude) time structure are least prone. Thus, although persons with a weak circadian time structure might be at an advantage in tolerating rotating shiftwork schedules while young, they appear to be at a high risk of developing intolerance to it later in life. It is hypothesized that a weak circadian time structure predisposes one to desynchronization when subjected to work schedules entailing regular disruption of the activity-rest synchronizer schedule. The mechanisms underlying this biological intolerance to shiftwork require much additional investigation.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)
在本章中,我们介绍了医学时间生物学这一主题。重点放在了与临床和职业医学相关的问题上。主要由临床病理学家进行的初步研究结果表明,根据采样或检测的昼夜时间,几种常用诊断检测的结果会受到显著影响。此外,药物的药代动力学和药效学可能会因其给药时间而有很大差异。实际上,某些药物或剂型的安全性和有效性取决于昼夜时间。临床上的一个新趋势是应用时间治疗学来最大化药物的有效性和安全性。对于职业健康从业者而言,医学时间生物学主题提供了新的视角,以便更好地解决临床职业医学中常见的问题。首先,使用符合时间要求(针对昼夜节律)的参考值有助于更精确地区分正常与异常的检测结果;例如,在入职前和定期的后续体检中出现的结果。其次,它能更好地洞察对轮班工作产生生物不耐受的原因。员工对轮班工作不耐受的抱怨常常遭到管理层和/或医务人员的怀疑。对轮班工作产生生物不耐受的现象是真实存在的。直到过去十年,才证明轮班工作不耐受具有时间生物学基础。似乎那些昼夜时间结构较弱的人,即生物周期振幅较低的人,在晚年更容易对轮班工作产生生物不耐受。而那些具有较强(高振幅)时间结构的人则最不容易出现这种情况。因此,虽然昼夜时间结构较弱的人在年轻时可能在耐受轮班工作时间表方面具有优势,但他们在晚年似乎有很高的发展为不耐受的风险。据推测,较弱的昼夜时间结构会使人在面对需要定期打乱活动 - 休息同步时间表的工作安排时更容易出现去同步化。这种对轮班工作生物不耐受的潜在机制还需要更多的研究。(摘要截选至400字)