• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

[现代冠状动脉手术、SYNTAX 试验及更新指南]

[Modern coronary surgery, the SYNTAX trial and updated guidelines].

作者信息

Thiem A, Attmann T, Cremer J

机构信息

Klinik für Herz- und Gefäßchirurgie, Universitätsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Kiel, Arnold-Heller-Str. 3, Haus 18, 24105, Kiel, Deutschland.

出版信息

Herz. 2011 Dec;36(8):669-76. doi: 10.1007/s00059-011-3532-6.

DOI:10.1007/s00059-011-3532-6
PMID:22033863
Abstract

Coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG), a modern and safe procedure, is considered the therapy of choice in the care of patients with multi-vessel disease. The 3-year results of the SYNTAX trial not only showed surgical advantages in terms of repeat revascularisation, but the results also demonstrated significant surgical benefit for myocardial infarction and survival rates. More differentiated analyses showed distinct disadvantages in percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) associated with the greater complexity of coronary pathology. PCI tends to be a comparable therapeutic option only in certain cases of left main stem lesions or multi-vessel disease. The findings from the SYNTAX study herald a new era in the treatment of coronary heart disease in which, as recommended in the updated guidelines issued by the EACTS/ESC in 2010, the interventionalist and the surgeon, working closely together as a"heart team", provide a sound therapy plan for affected patients.

摘要

冠状动脉旁路移植术(CABG)是一种现代且安全的手术,被视为多支血管病变患者治疗的首选方法。SYNTAX试验的3年结果不仅显示出手术在再次血运重建方面的优势,而且结果还表明手术对心肌梗死和生存率有显著益处。更细致的分析显示,经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)存在明显劣势,这与冠状动脉病变的复杂性增加有关。PCI往往仅在某些左主干病变或多支血管病变的情况下才是一种可比较的治疗选择。SYNTAX研究的结果开创了冠心病治疗的新纪元,正如欧洲心胸外科学会(EACTS)/欧洲心脏病学会(ESC)在2010年发布的更新指南中所建议的那样,介入专家和外科医生作为一个“心脏团队”密切合作,为受影响的患者提供完善的治疗方案。

相似文献

1
[Modern coronary surgery, the SYNTAX trial and updated guidelines].[现代冠状动脉手术、SYNTAX 试验及更新指南]
Herz. 2011 Dec;36(8):669-76. doi: 10.1007/s00059-011-3532-6.
2
Revascularization of unprotected left main coronary artery disease: strategy selection and systematic risk assessment.无保护左主干冠状动脉疾病的血运重建:策略选择和系统风险评估。
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2012 Aug 1;80(2):199-205. doi: 10.1002/ccd.24323. Epub 2012 Apr 17.
3
Treatment of Coronary Artery Disease: Randomized Trials on Myocardial Revascularization and Complete Arterial Bypass Grafting.冠状动脉疾病的治疗:心肌血运重建和完全动脉搭桥术的随机试验
Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2017 Apr;65(S 03):S167-S173. doi: 10.1055/s-0037-1601375. Epub 2017 Apr 7.
4
Percutaneous coronary angioplasty versus coronary artery bypass grafting in the treatment of unprotected left main stenosis: updated 5-year outcomes from the randomised, non-inferiority NOBLE trial.经皮冠状动脉介入治疗与冠状动脉旁路移植术治疗无保护左主干狭窄:NOBLE 随机非劣效性试验的 5 年更新结果。
Lancet. 2020 Jan 18;395(10219):191-199. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(19)32972-1. Epub 2019 Dec 23.
5
Left main coronary artery stenosis: a meta-analysis of drug-eluting stents versus coronary artery bypass grafting.左主干冠状动脉狭窄:药物洗脱支架与冠状动脉旁路移植术的荟萃分析。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2013 Dec;6(12):1219-30. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2013.07.008.
6
A meta-analysis of 3,773 patients treated with percutaneous coronary intervention or surgery for unprotected left main coronary artery stenosis.一项对3773例接受经皮冠状动脉介入治疗或手术治疗无保护左主干冠状动脉狭窄患者的荟萃分析。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2009 Aug;2(8):739-47. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2009.05.020.
7
Percutaneous Coronary Intervention vs Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting in Patients With Left Main Coronary Artery Stenosis: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.经皮冠状动脉介入治疗与冠状动脉旁路移植术治疗左主干狭窄患者的比较:系统评价和荟萃分析。
JAMA Cardiol. 2017 Oct 1;2(10):1079-1088. doi: 10.1001/jamacardio.2017.2895.
8
Outcomes After Coronary Stenting or Bypass Surgery for Men and Women With Unprotected Left Main Disease: The EXCEL Trial.男性和女性无保护左主干病变患者行冠状动脉支架置入术或旁路手术的结果:EXCEL 试验。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2018 Jul 9;11(13):1234-1243. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2018.03.051.
9
[3-year results of the SYNTAX trial--stent or surgery? A surgeon's perspective].[SYNTAX 试验的 3 年结果——支架还是手术?外科医生的观点]
Clin Res Cardiol Suppl. 2011 May;6:43-8. doi: 10.1007/s11789-011-0023-5.
10
Impact of European Society of Cardiology and European Association for Cardiothoracic Surgery Guidelines on Myocardial Revascularization on the activity of percutaneous coronary intervention and coronary artery bypass graft surgery for stable coronary artery disease.欧洲心脏病学会和欧洲心胸外科学会指南对稳定型冠状动脉疾病血运重建策略的影响:经皮冠状动脉介入治疗和冠状动脉旁路移植术的活动变化。
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2014 Feb;147(2):606-10. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2013.01.026. Epub 2013 Feb 10.

引用本文的文献

1
Guidelines versus reality: is coronary stent application in three-vessel disease standard or the exception?指南与现实:三血管病变中冠状动脉支架应用是标准还是例外?
Eur J Health Econ. 2018 Jul;19(6):821-830. doi: 10.1007/s10198-017-0924-4. Epub 2017 Aug 19.

本文引用的文献

1
Comparison of coronary bypass surgery with drug-eluting stenting for the treatment of left main and/or three-vessel disease: 3-year follow-up of the SYNTAX trial.比较冠状动脉旁路移植术与药物洗脱支架置入术治疗左主干和/或三血管病变:SYNTAX 试验 3 年随访结果。
Eur Heart J. 2011 Sep;32(17):2125-34. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehr213. Epub 2011 Jun 22.
2
Implications of new ESC/EACTS guidelines on myocardial revascularisation for patients with multi-vessel coronary artery disease.欧洲心脏病学会/欧洲心胸外科学会关于多支冠状动脉疾病患者心肌血运重建的新指南的影响
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2011 May;39(5):619-22. doi: 10.1016/j.ejcts.2011.02.029.
3
Complex coronary anatomy in coronary artery bypass graft surgery: impact of complex coronary anatomy in modern bypass surgery? Lessons learned from the SYNTAX trial after two years.
冠状动脉旁路移植术中的复杂冠状动脉解剖结构:复杂冠状动脉解剖结构对现代旁路手术的影响?SYNTAX 试验两年后得出的经验教训。
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2011 Jan;141(1):130-40. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2010.07.094.
4
Informed consent for interventions in stable coronary artery disease: problems, etiologies, and solutions.稳定型冠状动脉疾病干预措施的知情同意:问题、病因和解决方案。
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2011 Jun;39(6):912-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ejcts.2010.08.033. Epub 2010 Oct 8.
5
5-year clinical outcomes of the ARTS II (Arterial Revascularization Therapies Study II) of the sirolimus-eluting stent in the treatment of patients with multivessel de novo coronary artery lesions.5 年临床结果的动脉再血管化治疗研究 II(ARTS II)的西罗莫司洗脱支架治疗多支血管原发冠状动脉病变的患者。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2010 Mar 16;55(11):1093-101. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2009.11.049. Epub 2010 Feb 18.
6
Adherence of catheterization laboratory cardiologists to American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association guidelines for percutaneous coronary interventions and coronary artery bypass graft surgery: what happens in actual practice?经皮冠状动脉介入治疗和冠状动脉旁路移植术的导管室心脏病专家对美国心脏病学会/美国心脏协会指南的依从性:实际实践中会发生什么?
Circulation. 2010 Jan 19;121(2):267-75. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.109.887539. Epub 2010 Jan 4.
7
On-pump versus off-pump coronary-artery bypass surgery.体外循环下与非体外循环下冠状动脉旁路移植术
N Engl J Med. 2009 Nov 5;361(19):1827-37. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa0902905.
8
The SYNTAX Score: an angiographic tool grading the complexity of coronary artery disease.SYNTAX评分:一种对冠状动脉疾病复杂性进行分级的血管造影工具。
EuroIntervention. 2005 Aug;1(2):219-27.
9
Usefulness of SYNTAX score to select patients with left main coronary artery disease to be treated with coronary artery bypass graft.SYNTAX评分在选择接受冠状动脉旁路移植术治疗的左主干冠状动脉疾病患者中的应用价值。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2009 Aug;2(8):731-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2009.06.003.
10
Assessment of the SYNTAX score in the Syntax study.SYNTAX研究中SYNTAX评分的评估。
EuroIntervention. 2009 May;5(1):50-6. doi: 10.4244/eijv5i1a9.