• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基于价值的医疗器械采购。

Value-based purchasing of medical devices.

机构信息

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery and Rehabilitation, Vanderbilt Orthopaedic Institute Center for Health Policy, 1215 21st Avenue, Medical Center East Suite 4200, Nashville, TN 37232-8774, USA.

出版信息

Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2012 Apr;470(4):1054-64. doi: 10.1007/s11999-011-2147-9.

DOI:10.1007/s11999-011-2147-9
PMID:22033872
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3293958/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Health care in the United States is known for its continued innovation and production of new devices and techniques. While the intention of these devices is to improve the delivery and outcome of patient care, they do not always achieve this goal. As new technologies enter the market, hospitals and physicians must determine which of these new devices to incorporate into practice, and it is important these devices bring value to patient care. We provide a model of a physician-engaged process to decrease cost and increase review of physician preference items.

QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: We describe the challenges, implementation, and outcomes of cost reduction and product stabilization of a value-based process for purchasing medical devices at a major academic medical center.

METHODS

We implemented a physician-driven committee that standardized and utilized evidence-based, clinically sound, and financially responsible methods for introducing or consolidating new supplies, devices, and technology for patient care. This committee worked with institutional finance and administrative leaders to accomplish its goals.

RESULTS

Utilizing this physician-driven committee, we provided access to new products, standardized some products, decreased costs of physician preference items 11% to 26% across service lines, and achieved savings of greater than $8 million per year.

CONCLUSIONS

The implementation of a facility-based technology assessment committee that critically evaluates new technology can decrease hospital costs on implants and standardize some product lines.

摘要

背景

美国的医疗保健以其持续的创新和新设备及技术的生产而闻名。虽然这些设备的目的是改善患者护理的提供和结果,但它们并不总是能实现这一目标。随着新技术进入市场,医院和医生必须确定将哪些新设备纳入实践,而这些设备为患者护理带来价值是很重要的。我们提供了一种医生参与的流程模型,以降低成本并增加对医生偏好项目的审查。

问题/目的:我们描述了在一家主要学术医疗中心购买医疗设备的基于价值的流程的成本降低和产品稳定化的挑战、实施和结果。

方法

我们实施了一个由医生驱动的委员会,该委员会标准化并利用基于证据、临床合理和财务负责的方法来引入或整合新的供应品、设备和技术,以满足患者的护理需求。该委员会与机构财务和行政领导合作,以实现其目标。

结果

利用这个由医生驱动的委员会,我们提供了新产品的渠道,标准化了一些产品,降低了 11%至 26%的服务线的医生偏好项目的成本,每年节省超过 800 万美元。

结论

实施一个对新技术进行严格评估的基于设施的技术评估委员会可以降低医院在植入物上的成本,并标准化一些产品线。

相似文献

1
Value-based purchasing of medical devices.基于价值的医疗器械采购。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2012 Apr;470(4):1054-64. doi: 10.1007/s11999-011-2147-9.
2
Advances in Medical Devices Yield Savings throughout Healthcare, Says Boisier.
Biomed Instrum Technol. 2016 Jan-Feb;50(1):63-7. doi: 10.2345/0899-8205-50.1.63.
3
Generating appropriate clinical data for value assessment of medical devices: what role does regulation play?为医疗设备的价值评估生成适当的临床数据:监管发挥着什么作用?
Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res. 2014 Oct;14(5):707-18. doi: 10.1586/14737167.2014.950233. Epub 2014 Sep 8.
4
The impact of HTA and procurement practices on the selection and prices of medical devices.卫生技术评估及采购实践对医疗设备选择和价格的影响。
Soc Sci Med. 2017 Feb;174:89-95. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2016.11.038. Epub 2016 Nov 29.
5
Report on financing the new model of family medicine.关于新型家庭医学模式融资的报告。
Ann Fam Med. 2004 Dec 2;2 Suppl 3(Suppl 3):S1-21. doi: 10.1370/afm.237.
6
[Benefit assessments for medical technology devices: Strategic challenges for clinical research].
HNO. 2015 Aug;63(8):586-8. doi: 10.1007/s00106-015-0039-0.
7
Assessment of medical devices: how to conduct comparative technology evaluations of product performance.
Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2007 Fall;23(4):455-63. doi: 10.1017/S0266462307070547.
8
ASSESSING THE VALUE OF INNOVATIVE MEDICAL DEVICES AND DIAGNOSTICS: THE IMPORTANCE OF CLEAR AND RELEVANT CLAIMS OF BENEFIT.评估创新医疗器械和诊断的价值:清晰和相关的获益主张的重要性。
Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2018 Jan;34(4):419-424. doi: 10.1017/S0266462318000466. Epub 2018 Jul 20.
9
A review of the economic tools for assessing new medical devices.
Appl Health Econ Health Policy. 2015 Feb;13(1):15-27. doi: 10.1007/s40258-014-0123-8.
10
Healthcare technology: physician collaboration in reducing the surgical cost.医疗技术:医生协作降低手术成本。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2013 Jun;471(6):1854-64. doi: 10.1007/s11999-013-2828-7.

引用本文的文献

1
Barriers and Enablers of Value-Based Procurement in Dutch Healthcare Providers.荷兰医疗服务提供商基于价值的采购的障碍与推动因素
Int J Health Policy Manag. 2025;14:8514. doi: 10.34172/ijhpm.8514. Epub 2025 May 28.
2
Enhancing ALS disease management: exploring integrated user value through online communities evidence.加强肌萎缩侧索硬化症的疾病管理:通过在线社区证据探索综合用户价值。
Front Neurol. 2025 Jan 21;15:1393261. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2024.1393261. eCollection 2024.
3
Purchasing high-cost medical devices and equipment in hospitals: a systematic review.医院采购高值医用设备和器械:系统评价。
BMJ Open. 2022 Sep 1;12(9):e057516. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-057516.
4
Value-Based procurement for medical devices: A scoping review.基于价值的医疗器械采购:一项范围综述。
Med J Islam Repub Iran. 2021 Oct 13;35:134. doi: 10.47176/mjiri.35.134. eCollection 2021.
5
Examining the Factors Influencing Orthopedic Physician's Decision to Purchase Medical Devices: Evidence from Kuwait.探究影响骨科医生购买医疗设备决策的因素:来自科威特的证据。
Med Devices (Auckl). 2022 Mar 1;15:37-58. doi: 10.2147/MDER.S343591. eCollection 2022.
6
The "Hip Fracture" Bundle-Experiences, Challenges, and Opportunities.“髋部骨折”综合方案——经验、挑战与机遇
Geriatr Orthop Surg Rehabil. 2020 Mar 5;11:2151459320910846. doi: 10.1177/2151459320910846. eCollection 2020.
7
Medical technology as a key driver of rising health expenditure: disentangling the relationship.医疗技术作为医疗支出增长的关键驱动因素:理清两者关系。
Clinicoecon Outcomes Res. 2013 May 30;5:223-34. doi: 10.2147/CEOR.S39634. Print 2013.
8
Hospital costs fell as numbers of LVADs were increasing: experiences from Oslo University Hospital.随着左心室辅助装置(LVAD)数量的增加,医院成本下降:来自奥斯陆大学医院的经验。
J Cardiothorac Surg. 2012 Aug 27;7:76. doi: 10.1186/1749-8090-7-76.

本文引用的文献

1
Aligning incentives in orthopaedics: opportunities and challenges -- the Case Medical Center experience.调整骨科领域的激励措施:机遇与挑战——凯斯医疗中心的经验
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2009 Oct;467(10):2525-34. doi: 10.1007/s11999-009-0956-x. Epub 2009 Jul 8.
2
Executive summary: value-based purchasing and technology assessment in orthopaedics.执行摘要:骨科基于价值的采购与技术评估
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2009 Oct;467(10):2556-60. doi: 10.1007/s11999-009-0908-5. Epub 2009 Jun 4.
3
Evidence-based decision making: when should we wait for more information?基于证据的决策:我们何时应该等待更多信息?
Health Aff (Millwood). 2008 Nov-Dec;27(6):1642-53. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.27.6.1642.
4
Hip and knee implants: current trends and policy considerations.髋关节和膝关节植入物:当前趋势与政策考量
Health Aff (Millwood). 2008 Nov-Dec;27(6):1587-98. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.27.6.1587.
5
The consequence of secret prices: the politics of physician preference items.秘密价格的后果:医生偏好项目的政治因素。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2008 Nov-Dec;27(6):1560-5. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.27.6.1560.
6
The need for greater price transparency in the medical device industry: an economic analysis.医疗设备行业对更高价格透明度的需求:一项经济分析。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2008 Nov-Dec;27(6):1554-9. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.27.6.1554.
7
Price transparency for medical devices.医疗设备价格透明度。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2008 Nov-Dec;27(6):1544-53. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.27.6.1544.
8
Value-based purchasing for medical devices.基于价值的医疗器械采购。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2008 Nov-Dec;27(6):1523-31. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.27.6.1523.
9
Hospital-physician gainsharing in cardiology.心脏病学领域的医院与医生收益共享
Health Aff (Millwood). 2008 May-Jun;27(3):803-12. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.27.3.803.
10
AOA Symposium. Gainsharing in orthopaedics: passing fancy or wave of the future?美国骨科医师学会研讨会。骨科领域的收益分享:一时的风尚还是未来的潮流?
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2007 Sep;89(9):2075-83. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.F.01342.