Schulz P, Steimer T
Clinical Psychopharmacology Unit, Department of Psychiatry, Geneva University Hospitals, Chêne-Bourg, Switzerland.
Dialogues Clin Neurosci. 2000 Sep;2(3):177-82. doi: 10.31887/DCNS.2000.2.3/pschulz.
Conventional psychiatric diagnosis is founded on symptom description; this then governs the choice of psychotropic medication. This purely descriptive approach resembles a description of diphtheria from the premicrobiology era. Based on current advances in basic and clinical neuroscience, we propose inserting an intermediate level of analysis between psychiatric symptoms and pharmacologic modes of action. Paradigm 1 is to analyze psychiatric symptoms in terms of which higher brain function(s) is (are) abnormal, ie, symptoms should be analyzed as higher brain dysfunction: a case study in obsessive-compulsive disorder reveals pointers in four common symptoms to the higher functions of working memory, emotional overlay, absence of voluntary control, and the ability to evaluate personal mental phenomena. Paradigm 2 is to view psychotropic drugs as modifying normal higher brain functions, rather than merely treating symptoms, which they do only secondarily: thus depression may respond to agents that act on related aspects of mental life derived from higher brain functions, eg, the ability to enhance bonding. We advocate a strategy in which psychiatric illness is progressively reclassified through knowledge in clinical neuroscience and treatment targets are revised accordingly.
传统的精神科诊断基于症状描述,进而决定精神药物的选择。这种纯粹的描述性方法类似于微生物学时代之前对白喉的描述。基于基础神经科学和临床神经科学的当前进展,我们建议在精神症状和药理作用模式之间插入一个中间分析层次。范式1是根据哪些高级脑功能异常来分析精神症状,即症状应被分析为高级脑功能障碍:一项强迫症的案例研究揭示了四种常见症状指向工作记忆、情感叠加、缺乏自主控制以及评估个人心理现象能力等高级功能的线索。范式2是将精神药物视为改变正常高级脑功能,而非仅仅治疗症状,症状只是其次要作用:因此,抑郁症可能对作用于源自高级脑功能的精神生活相关方面的药物有反应,例如增强情感联系的能力。我们倡导一种策略,即通过临床神经科学知识逐步对精神疾病进行重新分类,并相应地修订治疗靶点。