Department of Dermatology, Faculty of Medicine, Dokuz Eylul University, Izmir, Turkey.
J Dermatol. 2012 May;39(5):433-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1346-8138.2011.01405.x. Epub 2011 Oct 31.
Clindamycin phosphate (CDP), benzoyl peroxide (BPO) and salicylic acid (SA) are known to be effective acne therapy agents depending on their anti-inflammatory and comedolytic properties. The purpose of this study was to investigate the efficacy and tolerability of the addition of SA treatment to CDP and BPO (SA and CDP + BPO) and compare it with CDP + BPO in patients with mild to moderate facial acne vulgaris. Forty-nine patients were enrolled in a 12 week prospective, single-blind, randomized, comparative clinical study. Efficacy was assessed by lesion counts, global improvement, quality of life index and measurements of skin barrier functions. Local side effects were also evaluated. Both combinations were effective in reducing total lesion (TL), inflammatory lesion (IL) and non-inflammatory lesion (NIL) counts. There were statistically significant differences between treatment groups for reductions in NIL counts beyond 2 weeks, IL counts and TL counts throughout the all study weeks, and global improvement scores evaluated by patients and investigator at the end of the study in favor of SA and CDP + BPO treatment when compared to CDP + BPO treatment. Both combinations significantly decreased stratum corneum hydration, although skin sebum values decreased with SA and CDP + BPO treatment. These combinations were also well tolerated except significantly higher frequency of mild to moderate transient dryness in patients applied SA and CDP + BPO. The addition of SA to CDP + BPO treatment demonstrated significantly better and faster results in terms of reductions in acne lesion counts and well tolerated except for higher frequency of mild to moderate transient dryness.
克林霉素磷酸酯(CDP)、过氧化苯甲酰(BPO)和水杨酸(SA)具有抗炎和溶解粉刺作用,被认为是有效的痤疮治疗药物。本研究旨在探讨在 CDP+BPO 中加入 SA 治疗的疗效和耐受性,并将其与 CDP+BPO 进行比较,以治疗轻度至中度面部寻常痤疮患者。49 例患者参与了一项为期 12 周的前瞻性、单盲、随机、对照临床研究。通过皮损计数、整体改善、生活质量指数和皮肤屏障功能测量来评估疗效。还评估了局部副作用。两种联合治疗均能有效减少总皮损(TL)、炎性皮损(IL)和非炎性皮损(NIL)计数。与 CDP+BPO 治疗相比,两种联合治疗在 2 周后 NIL 计数、IL 计数和 TL 计数在整个研究期间以及患者和研究者在研究结束时评估的整体改善评分的减少方面均有统计学差异。两种联合治疗均显著降低了角质层水分含量,尽管皮脂值随着 SA 和 CDP+BPO 治疗而降低。除了 SA 和 CDP+BPO 治疗组患者中轻度至中度暂时性干燥的频率显著升高外,这些联合治疗也具有良好的耐受性。与 CDP+BPO 治疗相比,SA 联合 CDP+BPO 治疗在减少痤疮皮损计数方面具有更好更快的效果,且具有良好的耐受性,除了轻度至中度暂时性干燥的频率较高外。