• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

测量新诊断为前列腺癌的男性的决策控制偏好。

Measuring decisional control preferences in men newly diagnosed with prostate cancer.

机构信息

Group Health Research Institute, Group Health Cooperative, Seattle, WA, USA.

出版信息

J Psychosoc Oncol. 2011;29(6):606-18. doi: 10.1080/07347332.2011.615383.

DOI:10.1080/07347332.2011.615383
PMID:22035534
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3285491/
Abstract

The Control Preferences Scale is widely used in decision research to measure patient preferences for participation in treatment decision making with health care providers. Following anecdotal reports of confusion with the scale the authors conducted an exploratory interview study to examine perceptions of the meaning and applicability of the Control Preferences Scale for men with localized prostate cancer seeking treatment in a multidisciplinary urology clinic. The preliminary data suggest potential validity challenges when the Control Preferences Scale is used in a multidisciplinary prostate cancer care setting, including the clinical context of localized prostate cancer and the meaning of shared decision making.

摘要

控制偏好量表在决策研究中被广泛用于测量患者在与医疗保健提供者共同参与治疗决策方面的偏好。由于该量表在使用中存在一些混淆,作者进行了一项探索性访谈研究,以检查局部前列腺癌男性患者在多学科泌尿科诊所寻求治疗时对控制偏好量表的意义和适用性的看法。初步数据表明,当控制偏好量表在多学科前列腺癌护理环境中使用时,可能存在有效性挑战,包括局部前列腺癌的临床背景和共同决策的意义。

相似文献

1
Measuring decisional control preferences in men newly diagnosed with prostate cancer.测量新诊断为前列腺癌的男性的决策控制偏好。
J Psychosoc Oncol. 2011;29(6):606-18. doi: 10.1080/07347332.2011.615383.
2
Does Patient Preference Measurement in Decision Aids Improve Decisional Conflict? A Randomized Trial in Men with Prostate Cancer.决策辅助工具中患者偏好测量是否能改善决策冲突?一项针对前列腺癌男性的随机试验。
Patient. 2017 Dec;10(6):785-798. doi: 10.1007/s40271-017-0255-7.
3
Integrating Patient Preference into Treatment Decisions for Men with Prostate Cancer at the Point of Care.在护理点将患者偏好纳入前列腺癌男性的治疗决策中。
J Urol. 2016 Dec;196(6):1640-1644. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2016.06.082. Epub 2016 Jun 23.
4
Physician Recommendations Trump Patient Preferences in Prostate Cancer Treatment Decisions.在前列腺癌治疗决策中,医生的建议比患者的偏好更具影响力。
Med Decis Making. 2017 Jan;37(1):56-69. doi: 10.1177/0272989X16662841. Epub 2016 Aug 10.
5
The Personal Patient Profile-Prostate decision support for men with localized prostate cancer: a multi-center randomized trial.个人患者档案-前列腺:针对局限性前列腺癌男性的决策支持-一项多中心随机试验。
Urol Oncol. 2013 Oct;31(7):1012-21. doi: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2011.10.004. Epub 2011 Dec 7.
6
Older adults newly diagnosed with symptomatic myeloma and treatment decision making.新诊断出有症状骨髓瘤的老年人及治疗决策
Oncol Nurs Forum. 2014 Jul 1;41(4):411-9. doi: 10.1188/14.ONF.411-419.
7
Treatment Preferences for Active Surveillance versus Active Treatment among Men with Low-Risk Prostate Cancer.低风险前列腺癌男性对主动监测与积极治疗的治疗偏好
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2016 Aug;25(8):1240-50. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-15-1079. Epub 2016 Jun 2.
8
Impact of health information-seeking behavior and personal factors on preferred role in treatment decision making in men with newly diagnosed prostate cancer.健康信息搜索行为和个人因素对新诊断前列腺癌男性治疗决策中首选角色的影响。
Cancer Nurs. 2012 Nov-Dec;35(6):411-8. doi: 10.1097/NCC.0b013e318236565a.
9
Perception of cancer and inconsistency in medical information are associated with decisional conflict: a pilot study of men with prostate cancer who undergo active surveillance.癌症认知和医疗信息不一致与决策冲突相关:一项对接受主动监测的前列腺癌男性的初步研究。
BJU Int. 2012 Jul;110(2 Pt 2):E50-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2011.10791.x. Epub 2011 Dec 7.
10
Incongruence between women's survey- and interview-determined decision control preferences: A mixed methods study of decision-making in metastatic breast cancer.女性在调查和访谈中决定控制偏好之间的不一致:转移性乳腺癌决策制定的混合方法研究。
Psychooncology. 2018 Aug;27(8):1950-1957. doi: 10.1002/pon.4747. Epub 2018 May 22.

引用本文的文献

1
Effects of a shared decision making intervention for older adults with multiple chronic conditions: the DICO study.多慢性病老年患者共享决策干预效果研究(DICO 研究)
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2023 Mar 1;23(1):42. doi: 10.1186/s12911-023-02099-2.
2
Preference Testing in Medical Devices: Current Framework and Regulatory Gaps.医疗器械的偏好测试:当前框架与监管差距
Med Devices (Auckl). 2022 Jul 6;15:199-213. doi: 10.2147/MDER.S368420. eCollection 2022.
3
Patient Decision-Making Factors in Aggressive Treatment of Low-Risk Prostate Cancer.低危前列腺癌积极治疗中患者决策因素。
JNCI Cancer Spectr. 2022 Jan 5;6(1). doi: 10.1093/jncics/pkac003.
4
The Treatment Decision-making Preferences of Patients with Prostate Cancer Should Be Recorded in Research and Clinical Routine: a Pooled Analysis of Four Survey Studies with 7169 Patients.前列腺癌患者的治疗决策偏好应在研究和临床常规中记录:四项调查研究中 7169 例患者的汇总分析。
J Cancer Educ. 2022 Jun;37(3):675-682. doi: 10.1007/s13187-020-01867-2. Epub 2020 Sep 17.
5
Patient and proxy reports regarding the experience of treatment decision-making in cancer care.患者及其代理人报告癌症治疗决策过程中的体验。
Psychooncology. 2020 Nov;29(11):1943-1950. doi: 10.1002/pon.5528. Epub 2020 Sep 27.
6
Health-related quality Of Life n patients with advanced Soft TIssue sarcomas treated with Chemotherapy (The HOLISTIC study): protocol for an international observational cohort study.接受化疗的晚期软组织肉瘤患者的健康相关生活质量(HOLISTIC 研究):一项国际观察性队列研究的方案。
BMJ Open. 2020 Jun 1;10(6):e035171. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-035171.
7
Cancer Patients Numeracy and Preferences for Information Presentation-a Survey Among German Cancer Patients.癌症患者的数字能力及对信息呈现方式的偏好——一项针对德国癌症患者的调查
J Cancer Educ. 2020 Feb;35(1):22-27. doi: 10.1007/s13187-018-1435-4.
8
Assessing the predictive power of psychological empowerment and health literacy for older patients' participation in health care: a cross-sectional population-based study.评估心理授权和健康素养对老年患者参与医疗保健的预测能力:一项基于人群的横断面研究。
BMC Geriatr. 2017 Feb 20;17(1):59. doi: 10.1186/s12877-017-0448-x.
9
What are the decision-making preferences of patients in vascular surgery? A mixed-methods study.血管外科患者的决策偏好是什么?一项混合方法研究。
BMJ Open. 2017 Feb 10;7(2):e013272. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-013272.
10
How best to use and evaluate Patient Information Leaflets given during a consultation: a systematic review of literature reviews.如何在咨询期间最好地使用和评估患者信息传单:文献综述的系统评价。
Health Expect. 2017 Aug;20(4):531-542. doi: 10.1111/hex.12487. Epub 2016 Sep 26.

本文引用的文献

1
Development and evaluation of the personal patient profile-prostate (P3P), a Web-based decision support system for men newly diagnosed with localized prostate cancer.个人患者档案-前列腺(P3P)的开发与评估,这是一个针对新诊断为局限性前列腺癌的男性的基于网络的决策支持系统。
J Med Internet Res. 2010 Dec 17;12(4):e67. doi: 10.2196/jmir.1576.
2
Preferred and actual participation roles during health care decision making in persons with cancer: a systematic review.癌症患者在医疗决策中的偏好和实际参与角色:系统评价。
Ann Oncol. 2010 Jun;21(6):1145-1151. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdp534. Epub 2009 Nov 25.
3
Use of existing patient-reported outcome (PRO) instruments and their modification: the ISPOR Good Research Practices for Evaluating and Documenting Content Validity for the Use of Existing Instruments and Their Modification PRO Task Force Report.使用现有患者报告结局(PRO)工具及其修改版:ISPOR 现有工具使用及其修改版的内容效度评估和文件记录的良好研究实践 PRO 工作组报告。
Value Health. 2009 Nov-Dec;12(8):1075-83. doi: 10.1111/j.1524-4733.2009.00603.x. Epub 2009 Sep 25.
4
Second opinions in oncology: the experiences of patients attending the Sydney Cancer Centre.肿瘤学中的二次诊断意见:悉尼癌症中心患者的经历
Med J Aust. 2009 Aug 17;191(4):209-12. doi: 10.5694/j.1326-5377.2009.tb02754.x.
5
Shared decision-making.共同决策
Healthc Q. 2009;12 Spec No Patient:e186-90. doi: 10.12927/hcq.2009.20947.
6
A multidisciplinary approach to the management of urologic malignancies: does it influence diagnostic and treatment decisions?多学科方法在泌尿系统恶性肿瘤治疗中的应用:是否影响诊断和治疗决策?
Urol Oncol. 2011 Jul-Aug;29(4):378-82. doi: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2009.04.008. Epub 2009 Jul 3.
7
A comparison of usability methods for testing interactive health technologies: methodological aspects and empirical evidence.用于测试交互式健康技术的可用性方法比较:方法学方面与实证证据
Int J Med Inform. 2009 May;78(5):340-53. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2008.10.002. Epub 2008 Nov 29.
8
The use of cognitive interviewing methodology in the design and testing of a screening tool for supportive and palliative care needs.认知访谈方法在支持性和姑息性护理需求筛查工具的设计与测试中的应用。
Support Care Cancer. 2009 Jun;17(6):665-73. doi: 10.1007/s00520-008-0521-2. Epub 2008 Nov 4.
9
Clinician and cancer patient views on patient participation in treatment decision-making: a quantitative and qualitative exploration.临床医生和癌症患者对患者参与治疗决策的看法:一项定量与定性探索
Br J Cancer. 2008 Sep 16;99(6):875-82. doi: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6604611.
10
Decision making in oncology: a review of patient decision aids to support patient participation.肿瘤学中的决策制定:支持患者参与的患者决策辅助工具综述
CA Cancer J Clin. 2008 Sep-Oct;58(5):293-304. doi: 10.3322/CA.2008.0006. Epub 2008 Aug 28.