• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

受欢迎还是不受欢迎?治疗师使用结构化访谈及其对患者接受度的评估。

Popular or unpopular? Therapists' use of structured interviews and their estimation of patient acceptance.

机构信息

University of Basel.

出版信息

Behav Ther. 2011 Dec;42(4):634-43. doi: 10.1016/j.beth.2011.02.003. Epub 2011 May 6.

DOI:10.1016/j.beth.2011.02.003
PMID:22035992
Abstract

An accurate diagnosis is an important precondition for effective psychotherapeutic treatment. The use of structured interviews provides the gold standard for reliable diagnosis. Suppiger et al. (2009) showed that structured interviews have a high acceptance among patients. On a scale from 0 (not at all satisfied) to 100 (totally satisfied) patients rated overall satisfaction with a structured interview at M=86.55. Nevertheless, therapists rarely seem to use structured interviews in clinical practice. The aim of this study was to assess how frequently therapists use structured interviews in daily practice. Secondly, we hypothesized that therapists underestimate patient acceptance of structured interviews. As a third goal, we explored further reasons why therapists choose not to use structured interviews. We conducted an online survey of 1,927 psychiatrists and psychotherapists in Switzerland and asked them how frequently they used structured interviews and how they estimated patient satisfaction with these interviews. Furthermore, we asked therapists why they chose to use or not use structured interviews. Therapists reported using structured interviews on average with about 15% of their patients. Furthermore, therapists estimated significantly lower patient acceptance than patients themselves indicated (M(therapist)=49.41, M(patient)=86.55). Our data suggest lack of familiarity with these instruments as well as an overestimation of the utility of open clinical interviews as further reasons for not using structured interviews.

摘要

准确的诊断是有效心理治疗的重要前提。使用结构化访谈为可靠诊断提供了黄金标准。Suppiger 等人(2009 年)表明,结构化访谈在患者中具有很高的接受度。在 0(完全不满意)到 100(完全满意)的量表上,患者对结构化访谈的总体满意度评分为 M=86.55。然而,治疗师在临床实践中似乎很少使用结构化访谈。本研究旨在评估治疗师在日常实践中使用结构化访谈的频率。其次,我们假设治疗师低估了患者对结构化访谈的接受程度。作为第三个目标,我们探讨了治疗师选择不使用结构化访谈的其他原因。我们对瑞士的 1927 名精神科医生和心理治疗师进行了在线调查,询问他们在日常实践中使用结构化访谈的频率以及他们如何估计患者对这些访谈的满意度。此外,我们还询问了治疗师选择使用或不使用结构化访谈的原因。治疗师报告说,他们平均约有 15%的患者使用结构化访谈。此外,治疗师的估计明显低于患者自己的指示(治疗师 M=49.41,患者 M=86.55)。我们的数据表明,对这些工具的不熟悉以及对开放式临床访谈的实用性的高估是不使用结构化访谈的进一步原因。

相似文献

1
Popular or unpopular? Therapists' use of structured interviews and their estimation of patient acceptance.受欢迎还是不受欢迎?治疗师使用结构化访谈及其对患者接受度的评估。
Behav Ther. 2011 Dec;42(4):634-43. doi: 10.1016/j.beth.2011.02.003. Epub 2011 May 6.
2
Acceptance of structured diagnostic interviews for mental disorders in clinical practice and research settings.在临床实践和研究环境中对精神障碍结构化诊断访谈的接受情况。
Behav Ther. 2009 Sep;40(3):272-9. doi: 10.1016/j.beth.2008.07.002. Epub 2008 Nov 5.
3
Therapists' assessment and treatment of internet infidelity cases.治疗师对网络不忠案例的评估与治疗。
J Marital Fam Ther. 2008 Oct;34(4):481-97. doi: 10.1111/j.1752-0606.2008.00090.x.
4
Standardized interviews in psychiatry.精神病学中的标准化访谈。
Psychiatr Dev. 1983 Summer;1(2):161-78.
5
Patients' relationship episodes and therapists' feelings.患者的关系事件与治疗师的感受。
Psychol Psychother. 2002 Dec;75(Pt 4):393-409. doi: 10.1348/147608302321151907.
6
[Patient and therapist satisfaction in outpatient psychotherapy].[门诊心理治疗中患者与治疗师的满意度]
Psychother Psychosom Med Psychol. 2005 Dec;55(12):517-26. doi: 10.1055/s-2005-867050.
7
Therapists' and clients' experiences of alliance ruptures: a qualitative study.治疗师和来访者对联盟破裂的体验:一项定性研究。
Psychother Res. 2011 Sep;21(5):525-40. doi: 10.1080/10503307.2011.587469. Epub 2011 Jun 30.
8
Therapist characteristics influencing the quality of alliance in long-term psychotherapy.影响长期心理治疗中治疗联盟质量的治疗师特征。
Clin Psychol Psychother. 2009 Mar-Apr;16(2):100-10. doi: 10.1002/cpp.605.
9
Is three a crowd? Clients, clinicians, and managed care.
Am J Orthopsychiatry. 2006 Apr;76(2):251-9. doi: 10.1037/0002-9432.76.2.251.
10
Patient suicide: a survey of therapists' reactions.患者自杀:治疗师反应调查。
Suicide Life Threat Behav. 2010 Aug;40(4):328-36. doi: 10.1521/suli.2010.40.4.328.

引用本文的文献

1
Evaluating agreement between medical record diagnoses and independent evaluator diagnoses in a community-based effectiveness study.在一项基于社区的疗效研究中评估病历诊断与独立评估者诊断之间的一致性。
Evid Based Pract Child Adolesc Ment Health. 2024 Oct 10. doi: 10.1080/23794925.2024.2414441.
2
Evaluating the Construct Validity and Sensitivity to Change of the Klenico Depression Domain in Psychotherapeutic Inpatient Care: Instrument Validation Study.评估心理治疗住院护理中Klenico抑郁领域的结构效度和对变化的敏感性:工具验证研究
JMIR Form Res. 2025 Jul 24;9:e50504. doi: 10.2196/50504.
3
A Blended Learning Course on the Diagnostics of Mental Disorders: Multicenter Cluster Randomized Noninferiority Trial.
精神障碍诊断的混合学习课程:多中心集群随机非劣效试验。
J Med Internet Res. 2024 Nov 27;26:e54176. doi: 10.2196/54176.
4
Revisiting the theoretical and methodological foundations of depression measurement.重新审视抑郁症测量的理论和方法基础。
Nat Rev Psychol. 2022 Jun;1(6):358-368. doi: 10.1038/s44159-022-00050-2. Epub 2022 Apr 14.
5
Parent-child agreement on children's psychopathology and the impact of parental depression.关于儿童精神病理学的亲子协议及父母抑郁的影响
Int J Methods Psychiatr Res. 2023 Oct 23;33(1):e1993. doi: 10.1002/mpr.1993.
6
Assessing validity of the Klenico diagnostic software system in a large psychotherapeutic inpatient sample.在一个大型心理治疗住院患者样本中评估Klenico诊断软件系统的有效性。
Front Digit Health. 2023 Aug 24;5:1176130. doi: 10.3389/fdgth.2023.1176130. eCollection 2023.
7
Preliminary validation of the Klenico diagnostic software self-report module through comparison with the diagnostic gold standard in an outpatient routine clinical sample.通过与门诊常规临床样本中的诊断金标准进行比较,对Klenico诊断软件自我报告模块进行初步验证。
Health Psychol Behav Med. 2023 Aug 30;11(1):2244576. doi: 10.1080/21642850.2023.2244576. eCollection 2023.
8
Clinicians' perceptions and practices of diagnostic assessment in psychiatric services.精神科服务中临床医生对诊断评估的看法和做法。
BMC Psychiatry. 2023 Mar 23;23(1):191. doi: 10.1186/s12888-023-04689-w.
9
shinyDLRs: A dashboard to facilitate derivation of diagnostic likelihood ratios.shinyDLRs:一个便于推导诊断似然比的仪表盘。
Psychol Assess. 2022 Jun;34(6):558-569. doi: 10.1037/pas0001114. Epub 2022 Feb 17.
10
Clinicians' attitudes toward standardized assessment and diagnosis within child and adolescent psychiatry.临床医生对儿童和青少年精神病学中标准化评估与诊断的态度。
Child Adolesc Psychiatry Ment Health. 2019 Feb 12;13:9. doi: 10.1186/s13034-019-0269-0. eCollection 2019.