Interdisciplinary Center for Applied Cognitive Studies, Warsaw School of Social Sciences and Humanities, Warsaw, Poland.
Int J Psychophysiol. 2012 Jul;85(1):129-33. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2011.09.022. Epub 2011 Oct 25.
The defocused attention hypothesis (von Hecker and Meiser, 2005) assumes that negative mood broadens attention, whereas the analytical rumination hypothesis (Andrews and Thompson, 2009) suggests a narrowing of the attentional focus with depression. We tested these conflicting hypotheses by directly measuring the perceptual span in groups of dysphoric and control subjects, using eye tracking. In the moving window paradigm, information outside of a variable-width gaze-contingent window was masked during reading of sentences. In measures of sentence reading time and mean fixation duration, dysphoric subjects were more pronouncedly affected than controls by a reduced window size. This difference supports the defocused attention hypothesis and seems hard to reconcile with a narrowing of attentional focus.
模糊注意假说(von Hecker 和 Meiser,2005)假设负面情绪会拓宽注意力,而分析性沉思假说(Andrews 和 Thompson,2009)则认为抑郁会使注意力焦点变窄。我们通过使用眼动追踪技术,直接测量抑郁组和对照组的知觉广度,对这些相互矛盾的假说进行了测试。在移动窗口范式中,在阅读句子时,可变宽度注视相关窗口之外的信息会被屏蔽。在句子阅读时间和平均注视持续时间的测量中,与对照组相比,抑郁组受到的影响更为明显,因为窗口尺寸减小了。这一差异支持模糊注意假说,似乎很难与注意力焦点变窄相协调。