Suppr超能文献

测序时代的原核生物分类学——多相分类法再探讨。

Prokaryotic taxonomy in the sequencing era--the polyphasic approach revisited.

机构信息

Institut für Angewandte Mikrobiologie Institut für Mikro- und Molekularbiologie, Justus-Liebig-Universität Giessen, Heinrich-Buff-Ring 26, Giessen, Germany.

出版信息

Environ Microbiol. 2012 Feb;14(2):291-317. doi: 10.1111/j.1462-2920.2011.02615.x. Epub 2011 Oct 31.

Abstract

The ultimate goal of taxonomy is to establish a system that mirrors the 'order in nature'. In prokaryote microbiology, almost all taxonomic concepts try to mirror the whole evolutionary order back to the origin of life with the cell as basic unit. The introduction of the 16S rRNA gene as molecular marker allowed for the first time the creation of a hierarchical taxonomic system based on one practical molecular marker. With the development of new and rapid sequencing technologies a wealth of new data can and will be used for critical evaluation of the taxonomic system. Comprehensive analyses of other molecular markers as well as total or partial genome comparisons confirmed the 16S rRNA based hierarchical system as 'backbone of prokaryote taxonomy' at least at the genus level and above. A tendency is visible to classify novel taxa more and more based on the genotype, i.e. comparative analyses of 16S rRNA and/or other gene sequence data (in multilocus sequence analysis, MLSA) at the genus and the species level, sometimes contrary to the indications of other (often phenotypic) data. The understanding of all the information behind these data is lagging far behind their accumulation. Genes and genomes do not function on its own and can only display their potential within the cell as the basic unit of evolution (and hence taxonomy). It is the phenotype and the natural selection that 'drive' evolution in a given environment. In this context, the 'polyphasic taxonomic approach' should be revisited again, taking into account the novel insights into genomes and other 'omic' sciences in a more strict and detailed context with the phenotype. This approach allows a more holistic view and provides a sound basis for describing the diversity of prokaryotes and has the potential to become the foundation of a more stable, in-depth taxonomy of the prokaryotes.

摘要

分类学的最终目标是建立一个反映“自然秩序”的系统。在原核微生物学中,几乎所有的分类学概念都试图将整个进化秩序追溯到以细胞为基本单位的生命起源。16S rRNA 基因作为分子标记的引入,首次允许基于一个实际的分子标记创建一个分层分类系统。随着新的快速测序技术的发展,可以并且将利用大量新的数据来对分类系统进行批判性评估。对其他分子标记以及全基因组或部分基因组的比较分析证实,基于 16S rRNA 的分层系统至少在属及以上水平是“原核分类学的骨干”。一种趋势是越来越倾向于根据基因型对新分类群进行分类,即对属和种水平的 16S rRNA 和/或其他基因序列数据(多位点序列分析,MLSA)进行比较分析,有时与其他(通常是表型)数据的指示相反。对这些数据背后的所有信息的理解远远落后于数据的积累。基因和基因组不是孤立运作的,只有在作为进化(因此也是分类)基本单位的细胞中才能发挥其潜力。是表型和自然选择在特定环境中“推动”进化。在这种情况下,应该再次重新审视“多相分类方法”,在更严格和详细的表型背景下,考虑到对基因组和其他“组学”科学的新见解。这种方法可以提供更全面的视角,并为描述原核生物的多样性提供坚实的基础,并有可能成为原核生物更稳定、更深入的分类学的基础。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验