• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

人员选拔作为一种信号博弈。

Personnel selection as a signaling game.

机构信息

Institute of Work and Organizational Psychology, University of Neuchâtel, Neuchâtel, Switzerland.

出版信息

J Appl Psychol. 2012 Jul;97(4):719-38. doi: 10.1037/a0026078. Epub 2011 Oct 31.

DOI:10.1037/a0026078
PMID:22040263
Abstract

Personnel selection involves exchanges of information between job market actors (applicants and organizations). These actors do not have an incentive to exchange accurate information about their ability and commitment to the employment relationship unless it is to their advantage. This state of affairs explains numerous phenomena in personnel selection (e.g., faking). Signaling theory describes a mechanism by which parties with partly conflicting interests (and thus an incentive for deception) can nevertheless exchange accurate information. We apply signaling theory to personnel selection, distinguishing between adaptive relationships between applicants and organizations, among applicants, and among organizations. In each case, repeated adaptations and counteradaptations between actors can lead to situations of equilibrium or escalation (arms races). We show that viewing personnel selection as a network of adaptive relationships among job market actors enables an understanding of both classic and underexplored micro- and macro-level selection phenomena and their dynamic interactions.

摘要

人员选拔涉及到求职者和用人单位等市场参与者之间的信息交流。除非对他们有利,否则这些参与者没有动机去交流有关他们能力和对雇佣关系的承诺的准确信息。这种情况解释了人员选拔中的许多现象(例如,造假)。信号传递理论描述了一种机制,通过这种机制,利益部分冲突的各方(因此有欺骗的动机)仍然可以交流准确的信息。我们将信号传递理论应用于人员选拔,区分了求职者与用人单位之间、求职者之间以及用人单位之间的适应性关系。在每种情况下,参与者之间的反复适应和反适应都可能导致平衡或升级(军备竞赛)的情况。我们表明,将人员选拔视为求职者和用人单位之间的适应性关系网络,可以帮助理解经典的和研究不足的微观和宏观层面的选拔现象及其动态相互作用。

相似文献

1
Personnel selection as a signaling game.人员选拔作为一种信号博弈。
J Appl Psychol. 2012 Jul;97(4):719-38. doi: 10.1037/a0026078. Epub 2011 Oct 31.
2
Applicant reactions and faking in real-life personnel selection.申请人在实际人员选拔中的反应和造假。
Scand J Psychol. 2011 Aug;52(4):376-81. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9450.2011.00892.x.
3
Team negotiation: social, epistemic, economic, and psychological consequences of subgroup conflict.团队谈判:亚群体冲突的社会、认知、经济及心理后果
Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2008 Dec;34(12):1687-702. doi: 10.1177/0146167208324102. Epub 2008 Oct 2.
4
Liar! Liar! (when stakes are higher): Understanding how the overclaiming technique can be used to measure faking in personnel selection.骗子!骗子!(当 stakes 更高时):了解如何使用夸大声明技术来衡量人员选拔中的伪造行为。
J Appl Psychol. 2020 Aug;105(8):784-799. doi: 10.1037/apl0000463. Epub 2019 Nov 11.
5
Getting off on the wrong foot: the timing of a breach and the restoration of trust.出师不利:违约时机与信任重建
Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2008 Dec;34(12):1601-12. doi: 10.1177/0146167208324512.
6
A house divided: cooperative and competitive recruitment in vital industries.一个分裂的房子:生命产业中的合作和竞争招聘。
J Nurs Manag. 2016 Mar;24(2):253-60. doi: 10.1111/jonm.12308. Epub 2015 Apr 21.
7
Natural selection and social preferences.自然选择与社会偏好。
J Theor Biol. 2006 Mar 7;239(1):79-92. doi: 10.1016/j.jtbi.2005.07.014. Epub 2005 Sep 19.
8
When is straightforwardness a liability in negotiations? The role of integrative potential and structural power.在谈判中,坦率何时会成为一种负担?整合潜力和结构权力的作用。
J Appl Psychol. 2009 Jul;94(4):1032-47. doi: 10.1037/a0014965.
9
Trust, conflict, and cooperation: a meta-analysis.信任、冲突与合作:一项元分析。
Psychol Bull. 2013 Sep;139(5):1090-112. doi: 10.1037/a0030939. Epub 2012 Dec 10.
10
How dangerous is truth in employment references?就业推荐信中的真实信息有多危险?
Health Care Superv. 1993 Dec;12(2):1-16.

引用本文的文献

1
International experience of a direct supervisor-does it matter for self-initiated expatriates' adjustment?直属上级的国际经验对主动外派员工的适应有影响吗?
PLoS One. 2025 Jun 23;20(6):e0326848. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0326848. eCollection 2025.
2
Learning in Interactive Decision-Making: The Interplay Between Cognitive Abilities and the Strategic Environment.交互式决策中的学习:认知能力与战略环境之间的相互作用
Open Mind (Camb). 2025 Jan 23;9:210-239. doi: 10.1162/opmi_a_00186. eCollection 2025.
3
Employer branding, organization's image and reputation, and intention to apply: the moderating role of the availability of organizational information on social media.
雇主品牌、组织形象与声誉以及求职意向:社交媒体上组织信息可得性的调节作用
Front Sociol. 2024 Apr 8;9:1256733. doi: 10.3389/fsoc.2024.1256733. eCollection 2024.
4
A scoping review on innovative methods for personality observation.关于人格观察创新方法的范围综述。
Front Psychol. 2023 Mar 8;14:1112287. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1112287. eCollection 2023.
5
Response to a crisis and applicant attraction: Signaling employer brand personality and organizational trust through warm and competent COVID-19 responses.对危机的应对与求职者吸引力:通过对新冠疫情的热情且有效的应对来彰显雇主品牌个性与组织信任。
Int J Sel Assess. 2022 Jul 15. doi: 10.1111/ijsa.12394.
6
Implicit Age Cues in Resumes: Subtle Effects on Hiring Discrimination.简历中的隐性年龄线索:对招聘歧视的微妙影响。
Front Psychol. 2017 Aug 10;8:1321. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01321. eCollection 2017.
7
Selling and Smooth-Talking: Effects of Interviewer Impression Management from a Signaling Perspective.推销与花言巧语:从信号角度看面试官印象管理的影响
Front Psychol. 2017 May 29;8:740. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00740. eCollection 2017.
8
Once an Impression Manager, Always an Impression Manager? Antecedents of Honest and Deceptive Impression Management Use and Variability across Multiple Job Interviews.一朝成为印象管理者,便永远是印象管理者?诚实与欺骗性印象管理的前因及在多次求职面试中的变化
Front Psychol. 2017 Jan 24;8:29. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00029. eCollection 2017.