Suppr超能文献

常规整脊治疗的结局、危害和疗效:一项随机对照试验的研究方案。

Outcomes of usual chiropractic, harm & efficacy, the ouch study: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.

机构信息

School of Chiropractic and Sports Science, Murdoch University, Perth, Australia.

出版信息

Trials. 2011 Oct 31;12:235. doi: 10.1186/1745-6215-12-235.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Previous studies have demonstrated that adverse events occur during chiropractic treatment. However, because of these studies design we do not know the frequency and extent of these events when compared to sham treatment. The principal aims of this study are to establish the frequency and severity of adverse effects from short term usual chiropractic treatment of the spine when compared to a sham treatment group. The secondary aim of this study is to establish the efficacy of usual short term chiropractic care for spinal pain when compared to a sham intervention.

METHODS

One hundred and eighty participants will be randomly allocated to either usual chiropractic care or a sham intervention group. To be considered for inclusion the participants must have experienced non-specific spinal pain for at least one week. The study will be conducted at the clinics of registered chiropractors in Western Australia. Participants in each group will receive two treatments at intervals no less than one week. For the usual chiropractic care group, the selection of therapeutic techniques will be left to the chiropractors' discretion. For the sham intervention group, de-tuned ultrasound and de-tuned activator treatment will be applied by the chiropractors to the regions where spinal pain is experienced. Adverse events will be assessed two days after each appointment using a questionnaire developed for this study. The efficacy of short term chiropractic care for spinal pain will be examined at two week follow-up by assessing pain, physical function, minimum acceptable outcome, and satisfaction with care, with the use of the following outcome measures: Numerical Rating Scale, Functional Rating Index, Neck Disability Index, Minimum Acceptable Outcome Questionnaire, Oswestry Disability Index, and a global measure of treatment satisfaction. The statistician, outcome assessor, and participants will be blinded to treatment allocation.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Australia and New Zealand Clinical Trials Register (ANZCTR): ACTRN12611000542998.

摘要

背景

先前的研究表明,整脊治疗过程中会出现不良反应。然而,由于这些研究设计,我们不知道与假治疗相比,这些事件的频率和程度。本研究的主要目的是确定与假治疗组相比,短期常规脊柱整脊治疗的不良事件的频率和严重程度。本研究的次要目的是确定与假干预相比,常规短期脊柱疼痛整脊治疗的疗效。

方法

将 180 名参与者随机分配到常规整脊治疗组或假干预组。为了考虑纳入标准,参与者必须经历过至少一周的非特异性脊柱疼痛。该研究将在西澳大利亚注册整脊师的诊所进行。每组的参与者将在间隔不少于一周的时间内接受两次治疗。对于常规整脊治疗组,治疗技术的选择将由整脊师自行决定。对于假干预组,由整脊师将失谐超声和失谐激活器治疗应用于经历脊柱疼痛的区域。在每次预约后两天,使用为这项研究开发的问卷评估不良事件。在两周随访时,通过评估疼痛、身体功能、最小可接受结局和对护理的满意度,检查短期整脊治疗对脊柱疼痛的疗效,使用以下结局测量:数字评分量表、功能评分指数、颈部残疾指数、最小可接受结局问卷、Oswestry 残疾指数和全球治疗满意度测量。统计员、结局评估者和参与者将对治疗分配进行盲法。

试验注册

澳大利亚和新西兰临床试验注册中心(ANZCTR):ACTRN12611000542998。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b672/3224760/1073454c103f/1745-6215-12-235-1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验