整体变化评定量表：优势与劣势综述及设计考量
Global rating of change scales: a review of strengths and weaknesses and considerations for design.
作者信息
Kamper Steven J, Maher Christopher G, Mackay Grant
出版信息
J Man Manip Ther. 2009;17(3):163-70. doi: 10.1179/jmt.2009.17.3.163.
Abstract
Most clinicians ask their patients to rate whether their health condition has improved or deteriorated over time and then use this information to guide management decisions. Many studies also use patient-rated change as an outcome measure to determine the efficacy of a particular treatment. Global rating of change (GRC) scales provide a method of obtaining this information in a manner that is quick, flexible, and efficient. As with any outcome measure, however, meaningful interpretation of results can only be undertaken with due consideration of the clinimetric properties, strengths, and weaknesses of the instrument. The purpose of this article is to summarize this information to assist appropriate interpretation of the GRC results and to provide evidence-informed advice to guide design and administration of GRC scales. These considerations are relevant and applicable to the use of GRC scales both in the clinic and in research.
摘要
大多数临床医生会询问患者对其健康状况随时间推移是有所改善还是恶化进行评分，然后利用这些信息来指导管理决策。许多研究也将患者自评的变化作为一项结果指标，以确定特定治疗的疗效。整体变化评分（GRC）量表提供了一种快速、灵活且高效地获取此类信息的方法。然而，与任何结果指标一样，只有在充分考虑该工具的测量学特性、优点和缺点后，才能对结果进行有意义的解读。本文旨在总结这些信息，以帮助对GRC结果进行恰当解读，并提供基于证据的建议，以指导GRC量表的设计和应用。这些考量对于GRC量表在临床和研究中的使用均具有相关性和适用性。
相似文献
1
Global rating of change scales: a review of strengths and weaknesses and considerations for design.
J Man Manip Ther. 2009;17(3):163-70. doi: 10.1179/jmt.2009.17.3.163.
2
ADCS Prevention Instrument Project: ADCS-clinicians' global impression of change scales (ADCS-CGIC), self-rated and study partner-rated versions.
Alzheimer Dis Assoc Disord. 2006 Oct-Dec;20(4 Suppl 3):S124-38. doi: 10.1097/01.wad.0000213878.47924.44.
3
A guide to choosing a burn scar rating scale for clinical or research use.
Burns. 2013 Nov;39(7):1341-50. doi: 10.1016/j.burns.2013.04.021. Epub 2013 Jun 13.
4
When global rating of change contradicts observed change: Examining appraisal processes underlying paradoxical responses over time.
Qual Life Res. 2017 Apr;26(4):847-857. doi: 10.1007/s11136-016-1414-3. Epub 2016 Oct 8.
5
The Spine Functional Index: development and clinimetric validation of a new whole-spine functional outcome measure.
Spine J. 2019 Feb;19(2):e19-e27. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2013.09.055. Epub 2013 Oct 25.
6
Historical perspective: The pros and cons of conventional outcome measures in Parkinson's disease.
Parkinsonism Relat Disord. 2018 Jan;46 Suppl 1:S47-S52. doi: 10.1016/j.parkreldis.2017.07.029. Epub 2017 Jul 29.
7
Patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis perceive positive improvements regardless of change in the Cobb angle - Results from a randomized controlled trial comparing a 6-month Schroth intervention added to standard care and standard care alone. SOSORT 2018 Award winner.
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2019 Jul 8;20(1):319. doi: 10.1186/s12891-019-2695-9.
8
Kellner's Symptom Questionnaire, a Highly Sensitive Patient-Reported Outcome Measure: Systematic Review of Clinimetric Properties.
Psychother Psychosom. 2020;89(2):74-89. doi: 10.1159/000506110. Epub 2020 Feb 12.
9
Validation of Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Short Forms for Use in Childhood-Onset Systemic Lupus Erythematosus.
Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2017 Jan;69(1):133-142. doi: 10.1002/acr.22927. Epub 2016 Nov 28.
10
Exploration of patient-centered success criteria and clinically measured improvement during falls rehabilitation.
J Geriatr Phys Ther. 2012 Oct-Dec;35(4):181-90. doi: 10.1519/JPT.0b013e318248e29d.
引用本文的文献
1
Development of machine learning models for predicting patient-perceived benefit following lumbar disc herniation or spinal stenosis surgery.
Eur Spine J. 2025 Sep 15. doi: 10.1007/s00586-025-09304-y.
2
Validation of the Functional Activity Scoring Tool (FAST): a novel pictorial scale for assessing function in patients with knee osteoarthritis in primary care.
BMJ Open. 2025 Aug 31;15(8):e100732. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2025-100732.
3
Clinical and Cognitive Improvement Following Treatment with a Hemp-Derived, Full-Spectrum, High-Cannabidiol Product in Patients with Anxiety: An Open-Label Pilot Study.
Biomedicines. 2025 Aug 1;13(8):1874. doi: 10.3390/biomedicines13081874.
4
Patient Satisfaction With a Comprehensive Remote Care Program for Chronic Condition Management for Adults Under Medical Care: Observational Study.
JMIR Hum Factors. 2025 Aug 26;12:e69586. doi: 10.2196/69586.
5
Translation and Validation of the Swedish Patient-Rated Ulnar Nerve Evaluation in Ulnar Nerve Entrapment.
Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2025 Aug 18;13(8):e7044. doi: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000007044. eCollection 2025 Aug.
6
Digitally delivered cognitive behavioral therapy for insomnia (CBT-I) for patients with chronic pain and insomnia (The Back2Sleep Trial): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.
Trials. 2025 Aug 15;26(1):292. doi: 10.1186/s13063-025-09013-3.
7
Clinical Characterization of the Lacrimal Functional Unit in Patients with Chronic Ocular Pain Associated with Dry Eye Disease.
J Clin Med. 2025 Jul 24;14(15):5250. doi: 10.3390/jcm14155250.
8
Pilot Study of Cannabidiol for Treatment of Aromatase Inhibitor-Associated Musculoskeletal Symptoms in Breast Cancer.
Cancer Med. 2025 Aug;14(15):e71117. doi: 10.1002/cam4.71117.
9
Developing a Consensus-Based Core Set of Outcome Measures for Ulnar Nerve Surgery: A Delphi Study With Focus on the Supercharged End-to-Side Anterior Interosseous Nerve to Ulnar Nerve Transfer.
J Hand Surg Glob Online. 2025 Jul 24;7(5):100788. doi: 10.1016/j.jhsg.2025.100788. eCollection 2025 Sep.
10
Effects of Non-Immersive Virtual Reality Exercise on Self-Reported Pain and Mechanical Hyperalgesia in Older Adults with Knee and Hip Osteoarthritis: A Secondary Analysis of a Randomized Controlled Trial.
Medicina (Kaunas). 2025 Jun 21;61(7):1122. doi: 10.3390/medicina61071122.
本文引用的文献
1
Clinimetric testing of three self-report outcome measures for low back pain patients in Brazil: which one is the best?
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2008 Oct 15;33(22):2459-63. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181849dbe.
2
Interpreting the clinical importance of treatment outcomes in chronic pain clinical trials: IMMPACT recommendations.
J Pain. 2008 Feb;9(2):105-21. doi: 10.1016/j.jpain.2007.09.005. Epub 2007 Dec 11.
3
Assessment of diclofenac or spinal manipulative therapy, or both, in addition to recommended first-line treatment for acute low back pain: a randomised controlled trial.
Lancet. 2007 Nov 10;370(9599):1638-43. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(07)61686-9.
4
Physiotherapist-directed exercise, advice, or both for subacute low back pain: a randomized trial.
Ann Intern Med. 2007 Jun 5;146(11):787-96. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-146-11-200706050-00007.
5
Evaluation of the core outcome measure in whiplash.
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2007 Mar 15;32(6):696-702. doi: 10.1097/01.brs.0000257595.75367.52.
6
Responsiveness of pain and disability measures for chronic whiplash.
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2007 Mar 1;32(5):580-5. doi: 10.1097/01.brs.0000256380.71056.6d.
7
Hop testing provides a reliable and valid outcome measure during rehabilitation after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.
Phys Ther. 2007 Mar;87(3):337-49. doi: 10.2522/ptj.20060143. Epub 2007 Feb 20.
8
Choice of external criteria in back pain research: Does it matter? Recommendations based on analysis of responsiveness.
Pain. 2007 Sep;131(1-2):112-20. doi: 10.1016/j.pain.2006.12.023. Epub 2007 Feb 2.
9
Comparison of general exercise, motor control exercise and spinal manipulative therapy for chronic low back pain: A randomized trial.
Pain. 2007 Sep;131(1-2):31-7. doi: 10.1016/j.pain.2006.12.008. Epub 2007 Jan 23.
10
Randomized controlled trial of exercise for chronic whiplash-associated disorders.
Pain. 2007 Mar;128(1-2):59-68. doi: 10.1016/j.pain.2006.08.030. Epub 2006 Oct 9.
Zotero 插件