Wellness Institute, Cleveland Clinic, 1950 Richmond Road/TR2-203, Lyndhurst, OH 44113, USA.
Eur J Epidemiol. 2011 Nov;26(11):877-86. doi: 10.1007/s10654-011-9626-x. Epub 2011 Nov 1.
The appropriate manner of incorporating incident angina, coronary artery bypass surgery (CABG), percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), diabetes, hypertension, and hypercholesterolemia, which may be both intermediate events and time-dependent confounders, into analyses of diet and coronary heart disease (CHD) is not clear. Using data from 72,266 women in the Nurses' Health Study between 1984 and 2006, the authors examined the relation between report of intermediate events and change in cereal fiber intake and used different proportional hazards models to evaluate the association between cereal fiber and CHD. Cereal fiber intake increased significantly among participants who reported hypercholesterolemia (0.42 g/day; 95% CI: 0.34, 0.51 g/day) and diabetes (0.07 g/day with each additional 2-year increment; 95% CI: 0.01, 0.13 g/day). However, angina, CABG/PCI, and hypertension were not associated with a change in cereal fiber intake and thus were not important time-dependent confounders. Cereal fiber intake was inversely associated with risk of CHD in all proportional hazards models, but results varied modestly depending on the approach used to incorporate multiple measures of diet. Because stopping the updating of dietary variables when an intermediate event is diagnosed may lead to misclassification, future analyses should consider updating diet even after these diagnoses to best represent long-term intake. To best evaluate associations with incidence of disease, considerations should include the temporal trends in diet, changes in intake following intermediate events, and latency patterns. Sensitivity analyses can also be useful.
将偶发心绞痛、冠状动脉旁路移植术(CABG)、经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)、糖尿病、高血压和高胆固醇血症(既是中间事件,也是时间依赖性混杂因素)纳入饮食与冠心病(CHD)分析的恰当方式并不明确。作者利用 1984 年至 2006 年间“护士健康研究”中 72266 名女性的数据,检验了中间事件报告与谷物纤维摄入量变化之间的关系,并使用不同比例风险模型评估了谷物纤维与 CHD 的相关性。报告高胆固醇血症的参与者(0.42g/天;95%CI:0.34,0.51g/天)和糖尿病(每增加 2 年,摄入量增加 0.07g/天;95%CI:0.01,0.13g/天)的参与者,谷物纤维摄入量明显增加。然而,心绞痛、CABG/PCI 和高血压与谷物纤维摄入量的变化无关,因此不是重要的时间依赖性混杂因素。在所有比例风险模型中,谷物纤维摄入量与 CHD 风险呈负相关,但结果因采用不同方法综合多种饮食测量值而略有不同。由于在诊断出中间事件时停止更新饮食变量可能导致分类错误,因此未来的分析应考虑即使在这些诊断后仍更新饮食情况,以最好地反映长期的摄入量。为了最好地评估与疾病发生率的关联,应考虑饮食的时间趋势、中间事件后摄入量的变化以及潜伏期模式。敏感性分析也可能有用。