• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Geographic access to US Neurocritical Care Units registered with the Neurocritical Care Society.美国神经危重症监护学会注册的神经危重症监护单位的地理可达性。
Neurocrit Care. 2012 Apr;16(2):232-40. doi: 10.1007/s12028-011-9644-2.
2
ACCESS: acute cerebrovascular care in emergency stroke systems.ACCESS:急诊卒中系统中的急性脑血管护理
Arch Neurol. 2010 Oct;67(10):1210-8. doi: 10.1001/archneurol.2010.250.
3
Geographic access to burn center hospitals.烧伤中心医院的地理可达性。
JAMA. 2009 Oct 28;302(16):1774-81. doi: 10.1001/jama.2009.1548.
4
Determining geographic areas and populations with timely access to cardiac catheterization facilities for acute myocardial infarction care in Alberta, Canada.确定加拿大艾伯塔省能够及时使用心脏导管插入设施进行急性心肌梗死治疗的地理区域和人群。
Int J Health Geogr. 2007 Oct 16;6:47. doi: 10.1186/1476-072X-6-47.
5
Comparing Methodologies for Evaluating Emergency Medical Services Ground Transport Access to Time-critical Emergency Services: A Case Study Using Trauma Center Care.比较评估紧急医疗服务地面交通获取时间关键紧急服务的方法:以创伤中心救治为例的案例研究。
Acad Emerg Med. 2012 Sep;19(9):E1099-108. doi: 10.1111/j.1553-2712.2012.01440.x.
6
Standards for Neurologic Critical Care Units: A Statement for Healthcare Professionals from The Neurocritical Care Society.神经重症监护病房标准:神经重症监护学会医疗专业人员的声明。
Neurocrit Care. 2018 Oct;29(2):145-160. doi: 10.1007/s12028-018-0601-1.
7
[Pediatric prehospital trauma care. A retrospective comparison of air and ground transportation].[儿科院前创伤护理。空中与地面转运的回顾性比较]
Unfallchirurg. 2002 Nov;105(11):1000-6. doi: 10.1007/s00113-002-0520-6.
8
Geographic access to critical care obstetrics for women of reproductive age by race and ethnicity.按种族和民族划分的育龄妇女获得关键产科护理的地理可达性。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2021 Mar;224(3):304.e1-304.e11. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2020.08.042. Epub 2020 Aug 21.
9
Population-level Spatial Access to Prehospital Care by the National Ambulance Service in Ghana.加纳国家救护服务在人群层面上对院前护理的空间可达性。
Prehosp Emerg Care. 2016 Nov-Dec;20(6):768-775. doi: 10.3109/10903127.2016.1164775. Epub 2016 Apr 13.
10
Access to trauma centers in the United States.美国创伤中心的可及性。
JAMA. 2005 Jun 1;293(21):2626-33. doi: 10.1001/jama.293.21.2626.

引用本文的文献

1
Demonstration of High Diagnostic Accuracy for Cerebral Ischemia in a Large Academic Hub-and -Spoke Telestroke Network.大型学术中心-辐射型远程中风网络对脑缺血的高诊断准确性的验证
Mayo Clin Proc Digit Health. 2023 Sep 21;1(4):490-497. doi: 10.1016/j.mcpdig.2023.08.004. eCollection 2023 Dec.
2
Equity in Clinical Care and Research Involving Persons with Disorders of Consciousness.涉及意识障碍患者的临床护理和研究中的公平性。
Neurocrit Care. 2024 Oct;41(2):345-356. doi: 10.1007/s12028-024-02012-3. Epub 2024 Jun 13.
3
Geographic Disparities in Case Fatality and Discharge Disposition Among Patients With Primary Intracerebral Hemorrhage.原发性脑出血患者病死率和出院去向的地域差异。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2023 May 16;12(10):e027403. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.122.027403. Epub 2023 May 9.
4
Impact of dedicated neuro-anesthesia management on clinical outcomes in glioblastoma patients: A single-institution cohort study.神经麻醉管理对胶质母细胞瘤患者临床结局的影响:单中心队列研究。
PLoS One. 2022 Dec 13;17(12):e0278864. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0278864. eCollection 2022.
5
Wearable Reduced-Channel EEG System for Remote Seizure Monitoring.用于远程癫痫发作监测的可穿戴式少通道脑电图系统。
Front Neurol. 2021 Oct 18;12:728484. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2021.728484. eCollection 2021.
6
Detecting Seizures and Epileptiform Abnormalities in Acute Brain Injury.急性脑损伤中癫痫发作和癫痫样异常的检测。
Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep. 2020 Jul 27;20(9):42. doi: 10.1007/s11910-020-01060-4.
7
Developments in hybrid operating room, neurointensive care unit, and ward composition and organization for stroke management.用于卒中管理的杂交手术室、神经重症监护病房及病房布局与组织的发展
Brain Circ. 2019 Apr-Jun;5(2):84-89. doi: 10.4103/bc.bc_11_19. Epub 2019 Jun 27.
8
Immunosenescence in neurocritical care.神经重症监护中的免疫衰老
J Intensive Care. 2018 Oct 12;6:65. doi: 10.1186/s40560-018-0333-5. eCollection 2018.
9
Neurocritical Care Has Matured and it is Time to Raise the Bar…Yet Again.神经重症监护已经成熟,是时候再次提高标准了。
Neurocrit Care. 2018 Oct;29(2):143-144. doi: 10.1007/s12028-018-0621-x.
10
Geographical access to critical care services in Scotland.苏格兰重症监护服务的地理可达性。
J Intensive Care Soc. 2018 Feb;19(1):6-14. doi: 10.1177/1751143717714948. Epub 2017 Jul 13.

本文引用的文献

1
Deaths: final data for 2007.死亡情况:2007年最终数据。
Natl Vital Stat Rep. 2010 May;58(19):1-19.
2
Surveillance for traumatic brain injury-related deaths--United States, 1997-2007.创伤性脑损伤相关死亡监测 - 美国,1997-2007 年。
MMWR Surveill Summ. 2011 May 6;60(5):1-32.
3
Geographic information systems amd emergency care planning.地理信息系统与急救护理规划。
Acad Emerg Med. 2010 Dec;17(12):1274-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1553-2712.2010.00947.x.
4
ACCESS: acute cerebrovascular care in emergency stroke systems.ACCESS:急诊卒中系统中的急性脑血管护理
Arch Neurol. 2010 Oct;67(10):1210-8. doi: 10.1001/archneurol.2010.250.
5
Impact of delayed transfer of critically ill stroke patients from the Emergency Department to the Neuro-ICU.急诊危重症脑卒中患者延迟转送至神经重症监护病房的影响。
Neurocrit Care. 2010 Aug;13(1):75-81. doi: 10.1007/s12028-010-9347-0.
6
Variation in critical care beds per capita in the United States: implications for pandemic and disaster planning.美国人均重症监护病床数量的差异:对大流行和灾难规划的影响。
JAMA. 2010 Apr 14;303(14):1371-2. doi: 10.1001/jama.2010.394.
7
Impact of pattern of admission on ICH outcomes.入院模式对 ICH 结局的影响。
Neurocrit Care. 2010 Apr;12(2):149-54. doi: 10.1007/s12028-009-9302-0.
8
Geographic access to burn center hospitals.烧伤中心医院的地理可达性。
JAMA. 2009 Oct 28;302(16):1774-81. doi: 10.1001/jama.2009.1548.
9
Access to emergency care in the United States.美国的急诊医疗服务
Ann Emerg Med. 2009 Aug;54(2):261-9. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2008.11.016. Epub 2009 Feb 7.
10
The impact of a neuro-intensivist on patients with stroke admitted to a neurosciences intensive care unit.神经重症专家对入住神经科学重症监护病房的中风患者的影响。
Neurocrit Care. 2008;9(3):293-9. doi: 10.1007/s12028-008-9050-6.

美国神经危重症监护学会注册的神经危重症监护单位的地理可达性。

Geographic access to US Neurocritical Care Units registered with the Neurocritical Care Society.

机构信息

Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Cincinnati, 231 Albert Sabin Way, Room 1654H ML 0769, Cincinnati, OH 45267-0769, USA.

出版信息

Neurocrit Care. 2012 Apr;16(2):232-40. doi: 10.1007/s12028-011-9644-2.

DOI:10.1007/s12028-011-9644-2
PMID:22045246
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5769870/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Neurocritical care provides multidisciplinary, specialized care to critically ill neurological patients, yet an understanding of the proportion of the population able to rapidly access specialized Neurocritical Care Units (NCUs) in the United States is currently unknown. We sought to quantify geographic access to NCUs by state, division, region, and for the US as a whole. In addition, we examined how mode of transportation (ground or air ambulance), and prehospital transport times affected population access to NCUs.

METHODS

Data were obtained from the Neurocritical Care Society (NCS), US Census Bureau and the Atlas and Database of Air Medical Services. Empirically derived prehospital time intervals and validated models estimating prehospital ground and air travel times were used to calculate total prehospital times. A discrete total prehospital time interval was calculated for each small unit of geographic analysis (block group) and block group populations were summed to determine the proportion of Americans able to reach a NCU within discrete time intervals (45, 60, 75, and 90 min). Results are presented for different geographies and for different modes of prehospital transport (ground or air ambulance).

RESULTS

There are 73 NCUs in the US using ground transportation alone, 12.8, 20.5, 27.4, and 32.6% of the US population are within 45, 60, 75, and 90 min of an NCU, respectively. Use of air ambulances increases access to 36.8, 50.4, 60, and 67.3 within 45, 60, 75, and 90 min, respectively. The Northeast has the highest access rates in the US using ground ambulances and for 45, 60, and 75 min transport times with the addition of air ambulances. At 90 min, the West has the highest access rate. The Southern region has the lowest ground and air access to NCUs access rates for all transport times.

CONCLUSIONS

Using NCUs registered with the NCS, current geographic access to NCUs is limited in the US, and geographic disparities in access to care exist. While additional NCUs may exist beyond those identified by the NCS database, we identify geographies with limited access to NCUs and offer a population-based planning perspective on the further development of the US neurocritical care system.

摘要

背景

神经重症监护为重症神经疾病患者提供多学科、专业化的治疗,但目前尚不清楚美国有多少人能够迅速获得神经重症监护病房(NCU)的专业治疗。我们旨在按州、区、地区和美国整体来量化各州获得 NCU 的地理条件。此外,我们还研究了运输方式(地面或空中救护车)和院前转运时间如何影响人群获得 NCU 的机会。

方法

数据来自神经重症监护学会(NCS)、美国人口普查局和空中医疗服务地图集与数据库。使用经验衍生的院前时间间隔和经验证的模型来估算院前地面和空中旅行时间,以计算总院前时间。为每个小的地理分析单位(街区组)计算离散的总院前时间间隔,并将街区组的人口相加,以确定在离散时间间隔(45、60、75 和 90 分钟)内能够到达 NCU 的美国人比例。结果按不同地理位置和不同的院前运输方式(地面或空中救护车)呈现。

结果

美国有 73 家 NCU 仅使用地面交通工具,分别有 12.8%、20.5%、27.4%和 32.6%的美国人在 45、60、75 和 90 分钟内可以到达 NCU。使用空中救护车可分别增加 36.8%、50.4%、60%和 67.3%的人群在 45、60、75 和 90 分钟内到达 NCU。东北地区使用地面救护车和 45、60 和 75 分钟的运输时间时,具有最高的到达率,而加上空中救护车后,西部地区的到达率最高。在 90 分钟时,南部地区到达 NCU 的地面和空中交通工具的机会最少。

结论

使用 NCS 注册的 NCU,目前美国获得 NCU 的地理条件有限,存在获得护理的地理差异。虽然 NCS 数据库之外可能还有其他的 NCU,但我们确定了获得 NCU 机会有限的地区,并从人口角度为美国神经重症监护系统的进一步发展提供了规划视角。