Kossoy L R, Hill G A, Herbert C M, Brodie B L, Dalglish C S, Dupont W D, Wentz A C
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee 37232.
Fertil Steril. 1988 Jun;49(6):1026-9. doi: 10.1016/s0015-0282(16)59955-5.
The records of 120 patients undergoing therapeutic donor insemination were reviewed to determine if the use of the enzyme immunoassay of urinary luteinizing hormone (LH) to plan inseminations decreased the number of cycles required to achieve conception. All inseminations were performed with fresh semen. Patients in group 1 (n = 26) utilized urinary LH testing in addition to basal body temperature (BBT) and cervical mucus examinations to time their inseminations, while inseminations in group 2 (n = 94) were timed with only BBT and cervical mucus examinations. The monthly fecundability of patients in group 1 was 0.13, whereas the monthly fecundability of patients in group 2 was 0.11. The mean number of inseminations was 1.4 and 1.6 per cycle for groups 1 and 2, respectively. There were no significant differences between groups 1 and 2 in regard to the number of cycles required to achieve conception. The use of a urinary LH immunoassay for insemination timing offers no benefit over conventional methods of timing (BBT, cervical mucus) when fresh donor semen is used.
回顾了120例接受治疗性供精人工授精患者的记录,以确定使用尿促黄体生成素(LH)酶免疫测定法来安排授精是否能减少受孕所需的周期数。所有授精均使用新鲜精液。第1组(n = 26)的患者除了进行基础体温(BBT)和宫颈黏液检查外,还利用尿LH检测来确定授精时间,而第2组(n = 94)的患者仅通过BBT和宫颈黏液检查来确定授精时间。第1组患者的每月受孕几率为0.13,而第2组患者的每月受孕几率为0.11。第1组和第2组每个周期的平均授精次数分别为1.4次和1.6次。在受孕所需周期数方面,第1组和第2组之间没有显著差异。当使用新鲜供精时,使用尿LH免疫测定法来确定授精时间并不比传统的时间确定方法(BBT、宫颈黏液)更具优势。