The Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Norway.
J Health Psychol. 2000 Mar;5(2):165-71. doi: 10.1177/135910530000500207.
This is a reply to K. Glanz, J. Maddock, J. O. Prochaska, D. Seedhouse, and H. Stam on the target article entitled: 'A pragmatic basis for judging models and theories in health psychology: the axiomatic method'. I defend the claim that one should only test hypotheses that are empirical and avoid testing hypotheses that are necessarily true because of conceptual relations and logic. I argue that the axiomatic system Psycho-Logic (PL) should be added to the other methods which form the health psychologist's methodological 'toolbox'.
这是对 K. Glanz、J. Maddock、J. O. Prochaska、D. Seedhouse 和 H. Stam 对题为“健康心理学中评判模型和理论的实用主义基础：公设方法”的目标文章的回复。我为只应检验经验性假设而避免检验由于概念关系和逻辑而必然为真的假设的主张进行辩护。我认为，公设逻辑（PL）系统应被添加到构成健康心理学家方法论“工具箱”的其他方法中。
