Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Science, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA.
J Clin Psychiatry. 2011 Nov;72(11):1452-64. doi: 10.4088/JCP.11m06878.
Quetiapine, combined with lithium or divalproex, demonstrates efficacy in the maintenance treatment of bipolar I disorder. This study investigated the efficacy and safety of quetiapine monotherapy as maintenance treatment in bipolar I disorder compared with switching to placebo or lithium.
Patients aged ≥ 18 years with DSM-IV-diagnosed bipolar I disorder and a current or recent manic, depressive, or mixed episode received open-label quetiapine (300-800 mg/d) for 4-24 weeks. Patients achieving stabilization were randomized to continue quetiapine or to switch to placebo or lithium (0.6-1.2 mEq/L) for up to 104 weeks in a double-blind trial. Outcome measures included times to recurrence of any mood event (primary outcome measure), manic event, or depressive event. Safety assessments included adverse events and laboratory values. The study was terminated early after planned interim analysis provided positive results. The study was conducted between March 2005 and July 2007.
Of 2,438 patients starting open-label quetiapine, 1,226 (50.3%) were randomized to double-blind treatment, including 1,172 (95.6%) in the intent-to-treat population. Time to recurrence of any mood event was significantly longer for quetiapine versus placebo (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.29; 95% CI, 0.23-0.38; P < .0001) and for lithium versus placebo (HR = 0.46; 95% CI, 0.36-0.59; P < .0001). Quetiapine and lithium significantly increased time to recurrence of both manic events (quetiapine: HR = 0.29; 95% CI, 0.21-0.40; P < .0001; lithium: HR = 0.37; 95% CI, 0.27-0.53; P < .0001) and depressive events (quetiapine: HR = 0.30; 95% CI, 0.20-0.44; P < .0001; lithium: HR = 0.59; 95% CI, 0.42-0.84; P < .004) compared with placebo. Overall rates of adverse events were generally similar between treatment groups, and safety findings for quetiapine were consistent with its known profile.
In patients stabilized during acute quetiapine treatment, continuation of quetiapine significantly increased time to recurrence of any mood, manic, or depressive event compared with switching to placebo. Switching to lithium was also more effective than placebo for the prevention of manic and depressive events.
clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT00314184.
喹硫平与锂或丙戊酸钠联合使用在双相 I 型障碍的维持治疗中显示出疗效。本研究旨在比较喹硫平单药治疗与转换为安慰剂或锂治疗作为双相 I 型障碍的维持治疗的疗效和安全性。
年龄≥ 18 岁、符合 DSM-IV 诊断的双相 I 型障碍且目前或近期有躁狂、抑郁或混合发作的患者接受为期 4-24 周的开放标签喹硫平(300-800mg/d)治疗。达到稳定的患者被随机分配继续接受喹硫平或转换为安慰剂或锂(0.6-1.2mEq/L)治疗,最长 104 周,进行双盲试验。主要结局指标包括任何情绪事件(主要结局指标)、躁狂事件或抑郁事件的复发时间。安全性评估包括不良事件和实验室值。在计划的中期分析提供阳性结果后,研究提前终止。该研究于 2005 年 3 月至 2007 年 7 月进行。
在开始接受开放标签喹硫平治疗的 2438 例患者中,有 1226 例(50.3%)被随机分配至双盲治疗,其中包括意向治疗人群中的 1172 例(95.6%)。与安慰剂相比,喹硫平治疗的任何情绪事件复发时间明显延长(风险比[HR] = 0.29;95%CI,0.23-0.38;P <.0001),锂治疗的任何情绪事件复发时间也明显延长(HR = 0.46;95%CI,0.36-0.59;P <.0001)。与安慰剂相比,喹硫平与锂治疗均显著延长了躁狂事件(喹硫平:HR = 0.29;95%CI,0.21-0.40;P <.0001;锂:HR = 0.37;95%CI,0.27-0.53;P <.0001)和抑郁事件(喹硫平:HR = 0.30;95%CI,0.20-0.44;P <.0001;锂:HR = 0.59;95%CI,0.42-0.84;P <.004)的复发时间。各组治疗相关不良事件发生率总体相似,喹硫平的安全性发现与其已知特征一致。
在急性喹硫平治疗稳定的患者中,与转换为安慰剂相比,继续使用喹硫平治疗可显著延长任何情绪、躁狂或抑郁事件的复发时间。转换为锂治疗也比安慰剂更能预防躁狂和抑郁事件。
clinicaltrials.gov 标识符:NCT00314184。