Elmira College, Elmira, NY 14901, USA.
J Learn Disabil. 2013 Jul-Aug;46(4):304-16. doi: 10.1177/0022219411421810. Epub 2011 Nov 4.
Much has been written about gifted students with learning disabilities, but there have been few large-scale empirical investigations, and the concept has proven controversial. The authors reviewed the available empirical literature on these students, focusing on (a) the criteria by which the students were identified and (b) the students' performance on standardized tests of ability and achievement. In addition, the test scores of these students were aggregated to determine typical performance levels. A total of 46 empirical articles were reviewed, and major findings included wide variability in identification criteria across studies, frequent reliance on dubious methods of learning disability identification, and a lack of academic impairment among the identified students. Implications for the "gifted/LD" category are discussed.
关于有学习障碍的天赋学生,已经有很多相关的研究,但大规模的实证研究较少,这个概念也颇具争议。作者回顾了现有的关于这些学生的实证文献,重点关注(a)确定学生的标准和(b)学生在能力和成就的标准化测试上的表现。此外,还汇总了这些学生的考试成绩,以确定其典型的表现水平。共回顾了 46 篇实证文章,主要发现包括研究间的识别标准存在很大差异,频繁依赖有问题的学习障碍识别方法,以及被识别的学生中缺乏学业障碍。对“有天赋/学习障碍”这一类别进行了讨论。