• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一项使用可见光固化粘合剂的间接粘结技术的临床试验。

A clinical trial of an indirect bonding technique with a visible light-cured adhesive.

作者信息

Read M J, O'Brien K D

出版信息

Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1990 Sep;98(3):259-62. doi: 10.1016/S0889-5406(05)81603-8.

DOI:10.1016/S0889-5406(05)81603-8
PMID:2206041
Abstract

A trial was carried out to evaluate the clinical performance of a visible light-cured adhesive when used with a foil mesh base in an indirect bonding technique. Thirty-seven patients entered the trial, and a total of 407 brackets were placed. The incidence and site of bond failure were recorded. The overall failure rate was 6.5%. There were no significant differences detected between the failure rates for either the upper or the lower arches or for the anterior and the posterior segments of the arches (p less than 0.01).

摘要

开展了一项试验,以评估一种可见光固化黏合剂在间接黏结技术中与箔网基底一起使用时的临床表现。37名患者进入试验,共粘贴了407个托槽。记录了托槽脱落的发生率和部位。总体脱落率为6.5%。上下牙弓或牙弓前后段的脱落率之间未检测到显著差异(p<0.01)。

相似文献

1
A clinical trial of an indirect bonding technique with a visible light-cured adhesive.一项使用可见光固化粘合剂的间接粘结技术的临床试验。
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1990 Sep;98(3):259-62. doi: 10.1016/S0889-5406(05)81603-8.
2
A visible light-activated direct-bonding material: an in vivo comparative study.一种可见光激活的直接粘结材料:一项体内对比研究。
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1989 Apr;95(4):348-51. doi: 10.1016/0889-5406(89)90169-8.
3
The bonding of orthodontic attachments using a visible light cured adhesive.
Br J Orthod. 1984 Jan;11(1):16-20. doi: 10.1179/bjo.11.1.16.
4
A comparison of retention rates of brackets with thermally-cured and light-cured custom bases in indirect bonding procedures.间接粘结程序中热固化和光固化定制基底托槽保留率的比较。
Aust Orthod J. 2000 Jul;16(2):115-7.
5
An in vivo comparison between a visible light-cured bonding system and a chemically cured bonding system.可见光固化粘结系统与化学固化粘结系统的体内比较。
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1998 Mar;113(3):271-5. doi: 10.1016/s0889-5406(98)70296-3.
6
Indirect bonding using a visible light cured adhesive.使用可见光固化粘合剂进行间接粘结。
Br J Orthod. 1987 Jul;14(3):137-41. doi: 10.1179/bjo.14.3.137.
7
A clinical trial comparing the failure rates of two orthodontic bonding systems.
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1996 Nov;110(5):547-50. doi: 10.1016/s0889-5406(96)70064-1.
8
Light-emitting diode vs halogen light curing of orthodontic brackets: a 15-month clinical study of bond failures.发光二极管与卤素灯对正畸托槽的光固化:一项关于粘结失败的15个月临床研究。
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2007 Oct;132(4):518-23. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2005.09.038.
9
Cariostatic effect and fluoride release from a visible light-curing adhesive for bonding of orthodontic brackets.用于正畸托槽粘结的可见光固化粘结剂的防龋作用及氟释放
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1992 Apr;101(4):303-7. doi: 10.1016/S0889-5406(05)80322-1.
10
A comparison of two indirect bonding adhesives.两种间接粘结剂的比较。
Angle Orthod. 2005 Nov;75(6):1019-23. doi: 10.1043/0003-3219(2005)75[1019:ACOTIB]2.0.CO;2.

引用本文的文献

1
Comprehensive clinical evaluation of indirect and direct bonding techniques in orthodontic treatment: a single-centre, open-label, quasi-randomized controlled clinical trial.正畸治疗中间接和直接粘接技术的综合临床评估:一项单中心、开放标签、准随机对照临床试验。
Eur J Orthod. 2024 Dec 1;46(6). doi: 10.1093/ejo/cjae036.
2
Do the methods for cleaning the base of brackets used in indirect bonding interfere with adhesion to tooth enamel?间接粘接中使用的托槽底座清洁方法是否会影响牙釉质的粘结?
Dental Press J Orthod. 2024 Sep 2;29(4):e242462. doi: 10.1590/2177-6709.29.4.e242462.oar. eCollection 2024.
3
Comparison of the shear bond strength of new and recycled metallic brackets using different adhesive materials : an in vitro study.
使用不同粘结材料对新型和回收金属托槽的剪切粘结强度进行比较:一项体外研究。
Eur Oral Res. 2023 May 4;57(2):96-102. doi: 10.26650/eor.20231163180.
4
Correlation of Shear Bond Strength and Degree of Conversion in Conventional and Self-Adhesive Systems Used in Orthodontic Bonding Procedures.正畸粘接程序中使用的传统和自粘接系统的剪切粘结强度与固化程度的相关性
Biomedicines. 2023 Apr 23;11(5):1252. doi: 10.3390/biomedicines11051252.
5
For Indirect Orthodontic Attachment Placement, Adding a Custom Composite Resin Base Is Not Beneficial: A Split-Mouth Randomized Clinical Trial.对于间接正畸附件放置,添加定制复合树脂基底并无益处:一项双颌随机临床试验。
Int J Dent. 2022 Jun 15;2022:9059697. doi: 10.1155/2022/9059697. eCollection 2022.
6
Effectiveness, efficiency and adverse effects of using direct or indirect bonding technique in orthodontic patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis.直接或间接粘接技术在正畸患者中的有效性、效率和不良反应:系统评价和荟萃分析。
BMC Oral Health. 2019 Jul 8;19(1):137. doi: 10.1186/s12903-019-0831-4.
7
Indirect Bonding Revisited.间接粘结再探讨。
Turk J Orthod. 2016 Sep;29(3):80-86. doi: 10.5152/TurkJOrthod.2016.16023. Epub 2016 Sep 1.
8
Incidence of orthodontic brackets detachment during orthodontic treatment: A systematic review.正畸治疗期间正畸托槽脱落的发生率:一项系统评价
Pak J Med Sci. 2018 May-Jun;34(3):744-750. doi: 10.12669/pjms.343.15012.
9
Micro-CT evaluation of microleakage under orthodontic ceramic brackets bonded with different bonding techniques and adhesives.采用微计算机断层扫描技术评估不同粘结技术和粘结剂粘结正畸陶瓷托槽下的微渗漏情况。
Eur J Orthod. 2016 Apr;38(2):163-9. doi: 10.1093/ejo/cjv023. Epub 2015 Apr 8.
10
A 15-month evaluation of bond failures of orthodontic brackets bonded with direct versus indirect bonding technique: a clinical trial.一项关于采用直接粘接技术与间接粘接技术粘接正畸托槽的粘接失败情况的15个月评估:一项临床试验。
Prog Orthod. 2014 Dec 30;15(1):70. doi: 10.1186/s40510-014-0070-9.