Cañeque V, Pérez C, Velasco S, Dı X0301 Az M T, Lauzurica S, Alvarez I, Ruiz de Huidobro F, Onega E, De la Fuente J
Departamento de Tecnologı́a de los alimentos, Instituto Nacional de Investigación y Tecnologı́a Agraria y Alimentaria, Carretera de la Coruña km 7.5, 28040 Madrid, Spain.
Meat Sci. 2004 Aug;67(4):595-605. doi: 10.1016/j.meatsci.2004.01.002.
Eighty-six male light lambs of Manchego breed were used in this study. Principal component (PC) analysis was performed to study the relationship between carcass quality variables (n=22) and between meat quality measures (n=21). The carcass quality was assessed using objective and subjective measurements of conformation and fatness besides the joints proportion and tissues proportion of the leg. The measurements used to evaluate meat quality were pH in longissimus dorsi and semitendinosus muscles, the colour, moisture, water holding capacity, cooking losses, texture and sensorial analysis on longissimus dorsi. The five first PCs explained about 77% of the total variability for carcass measures whereas for meat quality the 74% of the total variability was explained for the eight first PCs. All the carcass measurements showed similar weight to define the first PC, whereas the muscle and bone proportion as well as muscle:bone ratio of the leg were useful to define the second PC. The meat quality measures that were more effective to define the first PC were the meat colour measurements, whereas the sensorial variables defined the second PC. The projection of the carcass quality data in the first two PCs allowed to distinguish clearly between heavier carcasses (higher than 6.5 kg) and lighter carcasses (lower than 5.5 kg). The carcasses with a weight higher than 6.5 kg were on the left side of the figure, where the variables of conformation and fatness lie. The group of medium carcass weight were placed between the two previous groups. The projection of the meat quality data in the first two PCs did not differ between hot carcass weights, although there was a trend, the lighter carcasses lay on the left side of the graph, which implies small differences between meat quality in this range of carcass weight.
本研究使用了86只曼彻格品种的雄性幼羊。进行主成分(PC)分析以研究胴体品质变量(n = 22)之间以及肉质指标(n = 21)之间的关系。除腿部关节比例和组织比例外,还通过客观和主观测量体型和脂肪度来评估胴体品质。用于评估肉质的测量指标包括背最长肌和半腱肌的pH值、背最长肌的颜色、水分、持水力、烹饪损失、质地和感官分析。前五个主成分解释了胴体测量指标总变异性的约77%,而对于肉质,前八个主成分解释了总变异性的74%。所有胴体测量指标在定义第一个主成分时权重相似,而腿部的肌肉和骨骼比例以及肌肉与骨骼的比例有助于定义第二个主成分。对定义第一个主成分最有效的肉质指标是肉色测量指标,而感官变量定义了第二个主成分。胴体品质数据在前两个主成分中的投影能够清楚地区分较重的胴体(高于6.5千克)和较轻的胴体(低于5.5千克)。体重高于6.5千克的胴体位于图的左侧,体型和脂肪度变量所在的位置。中等胴体重的组位于前两组之间。尽管存在一种趋势,即较轻的胴体位于图表左侧,这意味着在此胴体重范围内肉质差异较小,但肉质数据在前两个主成分中的投影在热胴体重之间没有差异。