Division of Nuclear Medicine, Stanford University Medical Center, 300 Pasteur Dr, Room H-2230, Stanford, CA 94305, USA.
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2012 Feb;39(2):262-70. doi: 10.1007/s00259-011-1971-1. Epub 2011 Nov 8.
Typically, (18)F-FDG PET/CT and (18)F-NaF PET/CT scans are done as two separate studies on different days to allow sufficient time for the radiopharmaceutical from the first study to decay. This is inconvenient for the patients and exposes them to two doses of radiation from the CT component of the examinations. In the current study, we compared the clinical usefulness of a combined (18)F-FDG/(18)F-NaF PET/CT scan with that of a separate (18)F-FDG-only PET/CT scan.
There were 62 patients enrolled in this prospective trial. All had both an (18)F-FDG-alone PET/CT scan and a combined (18)F-FDG/(18)F-NaF PET/CT scan. Of the 62 patients, 53 (85%) received simultaneous tracer injections, while 9 (15%) received (18)F-NaF subsequent to the initial (18)F-FDG dose (average delay 2.2 h). Images were independently reviewed for PET findings by two Board-Certified nuclear medicine physicians, with discrepancies resolved by a third reader. Interpreters were instructed to only report findings that were concerning for malignancy. Reading the (18)F-FDG-only scan first for half of the patients controlled for order bias.
In 15 of the 62 patients (24%) neither the (18)F-FDG-only PET/CT scan nor the combined (18)F-FDG/(18)F-NaF PET/CT scan identified malignancy. In the remaining 47 patients who had PET findings of malignancy, a greater number of lesions were detected in 16 of 47 patients (34%) using the combined (18)F-FDG/(18)F-NaF PET/CT scan compared to the (18)F-FDG-only PET/CT scan. In 2 of these 47 patients (4%), the (18)F-FDG-only scan demonstrated soft tissue lesions that were not prospectively identified on the combined study. In 29 of these 47 patients (62%), the combined scan detected an equal number of lesions compared to the (18)F-FDG-only scan. Overall, 60 of all the 62 patients (97%) showed an equal or greater number of lesions on the combined scan than on the (18)F-FDG-only scan.
The current study demonstrated that (18)F-FDG and (18)F-NaF can be combined in a single PET/CT scan by administering the two radiopharmaceuticals simultaneously or in sequence on the same day. In addition to patient convenience and reduced radiation exposure from the CT component, the combined (18)F-FDG/(18)F-NaF PET/CT scan appeared to increase the sensitivity for detection of osseous lesions compared to the (18)F-FDG-only PET/CT scan in the studied population.
通常情况下,(18)F-FDG PET/CT 和(18)F-NaF PET/CT 扫描作为两项独立的研究在不同的日子进行,以便为第一研究中的放射性药物衰减留出足够的时间。这对患者来说很不方便,并且会使他们暴露于两次 CT 检查的辐射下。在当前的研究中,我们比较了联合(18)F-FDG/(18)F-NaF PET/CT 扫描与单独的(18)F-FDG-only PET/CT 扫描的临床应用价值。
本前瞻性试验共纳入 62 例患者。所有患者均进行了(18)F-FDG 单独 PET/CT 扫描和联合(18)F-FDG/(18)F-NaF PET/CT 扫描。在这 62 例患者中,53 例(85%)同时接受了示踪剂注射,9 例(15%)在初始(18)F-FDG 剂量后接受(18)F-NaF 注射(平均延迟 2.2 小时)。由两名经过董事会认证的核医学医师对 PET 结果进行独立的回顾性评估,由第三位读者解决不一致的问题。阅片医师被要求仅报告可疑恶性肿瘤的发现。为了控制顺序偏倚,先阅读一半患者的(18)F-FDG 单独扫描。
在 62 例患者中的 15 例(24%)中,(18)F-FDG-only PET/CT 扫描或联合(18)F-FDG/(18)F-NaF PET/CT 扫描均未发现恶性肿瘤。在其余 47 例有恶性肿瘤 PET 结果的患者中,与(18)F-FDG-only PET/CT 扫描相比,在 47 例患者中的 16 例(34%)中,联合(18)F-FDG/(18)F-NaF PET/CT 扫描检测到更多的病变。在这 47 例患者中的 2 例(4%)中,(18)F-FDG-only 扫描显示了软组织病变,这些病变在联合研究中没有前瞻性地识别出来。在这 47 例患者中的 29 例(62%)中,联合扫描与(18)F-FDG-only 扫描检测到相同数量的病变。总的来说,在所有 62 例患者中,有 60 例(97%)在联合扫描中发现的病变数量多于或等于(18)F-FDG-only 扫描。
当前的研究表明,(18)F-FDG 和(18)F-NaF 可以通过同时或在同一天顺序给予两种放射性药物,在单次 PET/CT 扫描中联合使用。除了患者的便利性和减少 CT 成分的辐射暴露外,与单独使用(18)F-FDG 的 PET/CT 扫描相比,联合(18)F-FDG/(18)F-NaF PET/CT 扫描似乎提高了对研究人群中骨病变的检测灵敏度。