• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

个体差异与视觉搜索策略的元认知知识。

Individual differences and metacognitive knowledge of visual search strategy.

机构信息

Biological and Experimental Psychology Group, School of Biological and Chemical Sciences, Queen Mary University of London, London, United Kingdom.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2011;6(10):e27043. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0027043. Epub 2011 Oct 31.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0027043
PMID:22066030
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3205003/
Abstract

A crucial ability for an organism is to orient toward important objects and to ignore temporarily irrelevant objects. Attention provides the perceptual selectivity necessary to filter an overwhelming input of sensory information to allow for efficient object detection. Although much research has examined visual search and the 'template' of attentional set that allows for target detection, the behavior of individual subjects often reveals the limits of experimental control of attention. Few studies have examined important aspects such as individual differences and metacognitive strategies. The present study analyzes the data from two visual search experiments for a conjunctively defined target (Proulx, 2007). The data revealed attentional capture blindness, individual differences in search strategies, and a significant rate of metacognitive errors for the assessment of the strategies employed. These results highlight a challenge for visual attention studies to account for individual differences in search behavior and distractibility, and participants that do not (or are unable to) follow instructions.

摘要

生物体的一个关键能力是朝向重要的物体,并暂时忽略不相关的物体。注意力提供了感知选择性,以过滤压倒性的感官信息输入,从而实现有效的目标检测。尽管许多研究都考察了视觉搜索和注意力设置的“模板”,以便进行目标检测,但个体受试者的行为往往揭示了注意力实验控制的局限性。很少有研究考察个体差异和元认知策略等重要方面。本研究分析了两个用于联合定义目标的视觉搜索实验的数据(Proulx,2007)。数据显示出注意力捕获盲、搜索策略的个体差异,以及对所采用策略的评估中存在显著的元认知错误率。这些结果凸显了视觉注意力研究的一个挑战,即解释搜索行为和分心的个体差异,以及那些不(或无法)遵守指令的参与者。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/18c1/3205003/571cbc7f3dbd/pone.0027043.g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/18c1/3205003/4ec7fdeddcf1/pone.0027043.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/18c1/3205003/6e0fb34f7b56/pone.0027043.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/18c1/3205003/8ef91eec600c/pone.0027043.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/18c1/3205003/e399f8d70d7d/pone.0027043.g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/18c1/3205003/571cbc7f3dbd/pone.0027043.g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/18c1/3205003/4ec7fdeddcf1/pone.0027043.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/18c1/3205003/6e0fb34f7b56/pone.0027043.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/18c1/3205003/8ef91eec600c/pone.0027043.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/18c1/3205003/e399f8d70d7d/pone.0027043.g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/18c1/3205003/571cbc7f3dbd/pone.0027043.g005.jpg

相似文献

1
Individual differences and metacognitive knowledge of visual search strategy.个体差异与视觉搜索策略的元认知知识。
PLoS One. 2011;6(10):e27043. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0027043. Epub 2011 Oct 31.
2
Rapid top-down control over template-guided attention shifts to multiple objects.对模板引导的注意力向多个对象转移的快速自上而下控制。
Neuroimage. 2017 Feb 1;146:843-858. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2016.08.039. Epub 2016 Aug 21.
3
The attentional template in high and low similarity search: Optimal tuning or tuning to relations?高、低相似度搜索中的注意模板:最佳调谐还是调谐关系?
Cognition. 2021 Jul;212:104732. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2021.104732. Epub 2021 Apr 13.
4
Brain and Cognitive Mechanisms of Top-Down Attentional Control in a Multisensory World: Benefits of Electrical Neuroimaging.大脑与认知机制在多感官世界中的自上而下的注意控制:电神经影像学的优势。
J Cogn Neurosci. 2019 Mar;31(3):412-430. doi: 10.1162/jocn_a_01360. Epub 2018 Dec 4.
5
Exploring metacognitive accuracy in visual search.探索视觉搜索中的元认知准确性。
Mem Cognit. 2011 Nov;39(8):1534-45. doi: 10.3758/s13421-011-0123-y.
6
An individual differences approach to multiple-target visual search errors: How search errors relate to different characteristics of attention.一种针对多目标视觉搜索错误的个体差异研究方法:搜索错误与注意力不同特征之间的关系。
Vision Res. 2017 Dec;141:258-265. doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2016.10.010. Epub 2016 Dec 18.
7
Involuntary top-down control by search-irrelevant features: Visual working memory biases attention in an object-based manner.无关特征的自上而下的非自主控制:视觉工作记忆以基于对象的方式影响注意力。
Cognition. 2018 Mar;172:37-45. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2017.12.002. Epub 2017 Dec 8.
8
Spatial filtering restricts the attentional window during both singleton and feature-based visual search.空间滤波在单一元素搜索和基于特征的视觉搜索过程中都会限制注意力窗口。
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2020 Jul;82(5):2360-2378. doi: 10.3758/s13414-020-01977-5.
9
The Neural Dynamics of Attentional Selection in Natural Scenes.自然场景中注意选择的神经动力学
J Neurosci. 2016 Oct 12;36(41):10522-10528. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1385-16.2016.
10
Limited Cognitive Resources Explain a Trade-Off between Perceptual and Metacognitive Vigilance.有限的认知资源解释了感知警觉与元认知警觉之间的权衡。
J Neurosci. 2017 Feb 1;37(5):1213-1224. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2271-13.2016. Epub 2016 Dec 27.

引用本文的文献

1
Learning to suppress a location does not depend on knowing which location.学习抑制一个位置并不依赖于知道哪个位置。
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2022 May;84(4):1087-1097. doi: 10.3758/s13414-021-02404-z. Epub 2022 Feb 22.
2
Implicitly learned suppression of irrelevant spatial locations.对无关空间位置的内隐学习抑制
Psychon Bull Rev. 2016 Dec;23(6):1873-1881. doi: 10.3758/s13423-016-1065-y.
3
Functional MRI mapping of visual function and selective attention for performance assessment and presurgical planning using conjunctive visual search.

本文引用的文献

1
Guided Search 2.0 A revised model of visual search.引导搜索 2.0:一种改进的视觉搜索模型。
Psychon Bull Rev. 1994 Jun;1(2):202-38. doi: 10.3758/BF03200774.
2
The structural basis of inter-individual differences in human behaviour and cognition.人类行为和认知个体间差异的结构基础。
Nat Rev Neurosci. 2011 Apr;12(4):231-42. doi: 10.1038/nrn3000. Epub 2011 Mar 16.
3
Individual differences in recovery time from attentional capture.注意捕获恢复时间的个体差异。
使用联合视觉搜索进行视觉功能和选择性注意力的功能磁共振成像映射,以进行性能评估和术前规划。
Brain Behav. 2014 Mar;4(2):227-37. doi: 10.1002/brb3.213. Epub 2014 Jan 19.
4
Context-dependent control over attentional capture.注意捕获的上下文依赖性控制。
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2013 Jun;39(3):836-48. doi: 10.1037/a0030027. Epub 2012 Oct 1.
Psychol Sci. 2011 Mar;22(3):361-8. doi: 10.1177/0956797611398493. Epub 2011 Feb 10.
4
Neural predictors of within-subject fluctuations in attentional control.注意控制内个体波动的神经预测因子。
J Neurosci. 2010 Aug 25;30(34):11458-65. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0809-10.2010.
5
Identifying a "default" visual search mode with operant conditioning.通过操作性条件反射识别“默认”视觉搜索模式。
Acta Psychol (Amst). 2010 Sep;135(1):38-49. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2010.05.002.
6
Varying target prevalence reveals two dissociable decision criteria in visual search.变化的目标出现频率揭示了视觉搜索中两种可分离的决策标准。
Curr Biol. 2010 Jan 26;20(2):121-4. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2009.11.066. Epub 2010 Jan 14.
7
Stable individual differences in search strategy? The effect of task demands and motivational factors on scanning strategy in visual search.搜索策略中稳定的个体差异?任务需求和动机因素对视觉搜索中扫描策略的影响。
J Vis. 2009 Mar 13;9(3):7.1-16. doi: 10.1167/9.3.7.
8
Human variation in overriding attentional capture.人类在优势注意捕获方面的个体差异。
J Neurosci. 2009 Jul 8;29(27):8726-33. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2145-09.2009.
9
The normalization model of attention.注意力的规范化模型。
Neuron. 2009 Jan 29;61(2):168-85. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2009.01.002.
10
Individual differences in working memory capacity and visual search: the roles of top-down and bottom-up processing.工作记忆容量与视觉搜索中的个体差异:自上而下和自下而上加工的作用。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2007 Oct;14(5):840-5. doi: 10.3758/bf03194109.