St James's University Hospital, Beckett Street, Leeds, LS9 7TF, UK.
Eur J Pediatr. 2012 May;171(5):751-5. doi: 10.1007/s00431-011-1556-9. Epub 2011 Nov 10.
Child sexual abuse is increasingly recognised in all societies, affecting boys and girls alike in all age groups and often involving oral, anal and vaginal penetration. The presence of physical evidence following suspected child sexual abuse is important in confirming the diagnosis and providing legal corroboration that abuse has occurred. Whilst many children have no physical evidence, its presence should be carefully sought and documented by skilled examination, regardless of the time interval between any suspected abuse and the examination. When examination is close to the time of the abuse, forensic sampling may be required. Although many children have no physical findings, understanding the significance of physical findings has increased with both experience and research, although certainty and agreement is lacking in some areas. There are few case control studies of abused and non-abused children where standard terminology, examination method and description allow for meaningful comparison.
Physical findings rarely provide conclusive evidence of sexual abuse in isolation but may offer important pieces of the diagnostic "jigsaw picture".
儿童性虐待在所有社会中都日益受到认识,影响到所有年龄组的男孩和女孩,往往涉及口腔、肛门和阴道的插入。在疑似儿童性虐待后出现的身体证据对于确认诊断和提供发生虐待的法律佐证很重要。虽然许多儿童没有身体证据,但无论任何疑似虐待与检查之间的时间间隔如何,都应通过熟练的检查仔细寻找和记录身体证据。当检查接近虐待发生的时间时,可能需要法医取样。尽管许多儿童没有身体发现,但随着经验和研究的增加,对身体发现的意义的理解有所增加,尽管在某些领域还缺乏确定性和一致性。在受虐待和未受虐待的儿童中,很少有病例对照研究采用标准术语、检查方法和描述来进行有意义的比较。
身体发现很少能单独提供确凿的性虐待证据,但可能提供诊断“拼图”的重要部分。