Boroumandfar Khadijeh, Javaheri Shabnam, Ehsanpour Soheila, Abedi Ahmad
Department of Midwifery, School of Nursing and Midwifery, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran.
Iran J Nurs Midwifery Res. 2010 Dec;15(Suppl 1):283-91.
Domestic violence (DV) is a serious problem all over the world which had been extended to boundaries of countries, economical, cultural and racial classes. 10-69 percent of women are exposed to physical, sexual and emotional violence which has numerous physical and emotional consequences. Therefore, males' attitude towards women is one of the strongest predicting factors of violence against women, so one of the ways to remove the violence against women is to change the men's attitude. Changing the attitude, in the basic stages of the marriage for couples who are not yet involved with marital misunderstandings, will probably influence their future relationships, therefore, the present study reviewed two attitude changing methods of educational package (EP) and social inoculation (SI) which were used to change the attitude among male volunteers participating in the premarital counseling classes.
This was a semi-experimental study aimed to determine the influence of two methods of supplying EP and SI on the change of attitude toward DV against women. The study subjects included male volunteers participating in Isfahan Molla Hadi Sabzevari Premarital Counseling Center, where the attitudes of 183 subjects were investigated primarily using simple sampling method. Ninety-nine subjects who had positive attitude toward DV were selected and then, randomly distributed into three 33-subject groups. The first was SI group, the second was EP supply group and the third was the control group. Data collection tool was an evaluating questionnaire of the attitude toward DV against women which consisted of two parts, demographic data and 34 attitude evaluating questions. Scientific validity was determined by content validity method and scientific reliability was determined using Cronbach's alpha. Analyzing the data was done using descriptive (frequency and mean), analytical statistical methods (paired-t, independent t-tests, ANOVA, Duncan, Kruskal-Wallis and chi-square) and SPSS software.
Among 183 participants, 99 of them (54%) had a positive attitude with an average score of 46.5 and 84 of them (45%) with an average score of 29 had a negative attitude toward violence against women. Before the intervention, the highest violence attitude was in emotional, physical and sexual areas, respectively. After the intervention in the inoculation group, the highest attitude changes were in physical, sexual and emotional areas, respectively and in the EP group, in total the attitude changes score after the intervention was significant compared to prior to it, although changes were observed only in physical and sexual areas. In SI group, more attitude changes were occurred than that in EP group. In control group, the attitude score after the intervention had no significant change compared to it before.
Although attitude change has no guaranty for changing the behavior, in order to change the behavior, changing the attitude is required, in which for violence against women, it is better to be started at the beginning of the marital relationship. The SI method has been successfully applied in psychology Sciences and the health programs, but the EP method is not an effective method on its own to change the attitude, so it is better to be accompanied by other methods like group discussion, etc.
家庭暴力是一个全球性的严重问题,已跨越国界、经济、文化和种族阶层。10%至69%的女性遭受过身体、性和情感暴力,这会带来诸多身体和情感方面的后果。因此,男性对女性的态度是暴力侵害妇女行为最强的预测因素之一,所以消除暴力侵害妇女行为的方法之一是改变男性的态度。在婚姻的初始阶段,对于尚未陷入婚姻误解的夫妻而言,改变态度可能会影响他们未来的关系。因此,本研究回顾了教育套餐(EP)和社会预防接种(SI)这两种态度改变方法,它们被用于改变参加婚前咨询课程的男性志愿者的态度。
这是一项半实验性研究,旨在确定提供EP和SI这两种方法对改变男性对暴力侵害妇女行为态度的影响。研究对象包括参加伊斯法罕穆拉·哈迪·萨布泽瓦里婚前咨询中心的男性志愿者,首先采用简单抽样法对183名受试者的态度进行调查。选择了99名对家庭暴力持积极态度的受试者,然后将他们随机分为三个每组33人的小组。第一组是SI组,第二组是EP提供组,第三组是对照组。数据收集工具是一份关于男性对暴力侵害妇女行为态度的评估问卷,由两部分组成,即人口统计学数据和34个态度评估问题。通过内容效度法确定科学效度,使用克朗巴哈系数确定科学信度。使用描述性统计方法(频率和均值)、分析性统计方法(配对t检验、独立t检验、方差分析、邓肯检验、克鲁斯卡尔 - 沃利斯检验和卡方检验)以及SPSS软件进行数据分析。
在183名参与者中,99人(54%)持积极态度,平均得分46.5,84人(45%)持消极态度,平均得分29。干预前,在情感、身体和性方面的暴力态度最高。干预后,接种组在身体、性和情感方面的态度变化最大,而在EP组,尽管仅在身体和性方面观察到变化,但干预后的态度变化得分与干预前相比总体上具有显著性。在SI组中发生的态度变化比EP组更多。在对照组中,干预后的态度得分与干预前相比没有显著变化。
虽然态度改变并不能保证行为改变,但为了改变行为,需要改变态度,对于暴力侵害妇女行为,最好在婚姻关系开始时就着手。SI方法已在心理学和健康项目中成功应用,但EP方法本身并不是改变态度的有效方法,因此最好与小组讨论等其他方法相结合使用。