Suppr超能文献

[乳腺癌穿刺产物中雌激素受体的免疫细胞化学检测]

[Immunocytochemical assay of estrogen receptors in puncture products of breast carcinomas].

作者信息

Faverly D, Querton G, Degeyter M, Lenglet G, Devleeschouwer N, Leclercq G

机构信息

Afdeling Pathologie, Akademisch Ziekenhuis Nijmegen, Nederland.

出版信息

Bull Cancer. 1990;77(7):667-74.

PMID:2207355
Abstract

In a pilot study, estrogen receptors (ER) were assayed on 42 surgically removed breast tumors by the following 3 methods: biochemical assay with dextran coated charcoal (DCC), Abbott immunoenzymatic (ER-EIA) and immunocytochemical (ER-ICA) technics. DCC and ER-EIA were performed on biopsy specimens while ER-ICA was run on cytocentrifugated cells obtained by fine needle aspiration (FNA). ER contents were expressed according to an index taking into account the proportion of colored neoplastic cells and the intensity of staining. Statistical correlation coefficient (Spearman and Kendall) concordance, sensitivity and specificity between the results were calculated (ER - ICA/ER - EIA: P less than 0.001, r = 0.38, concordance = 83%, sensitivity = 86%, specificity = 77%; ER - ICA/DCC: P less than 0.05, r = 0.22, concordance = 77%, sensitivity = 85%, specificity = 63%; ER - EIA/DCC: P less than 0.001, (r = 0.60). As previously reported, both immunoassays showed good agreement. The weaker but nevertheless significant correlation found with reference DCC may be due to the heterogeneity of tumoral ER content. This hypothesis is supported by the variability of ER - ICA assays on multiple FNA performed in 16 cases from our series. Use of multidirectional FNA slightly improved the results. Nevertheless, ER - ICA appear to be a good semi-quantitative method and might be helpful in the follow-up of metastasis treated with anti-estrogen, especially in small lesions not assayable by DCC.

摘要

在一项初步研究中,通过以下3种方法对42例手术切除的乳腺肿瘤进行雌激素受体(ER)检测:用葡聚糖包被活性炭(DCC)进行生化检测、雅培免疫酶法(ER-EIA)和免疫细胞化学(ER-ICA)技术。DCC和ER-EIA在活检标本上进行,而ER-ICA在通过细针穿刺(FNA)获得的细胞离心涂片上进行。ER含量根据一个指数来表示,该指数考虑了染色肿瘤细胞的比例和染色强度。计算结果之间的统计相关系数(Spearman和Kendall)、一致性、敏感性和特异性(ER-ICA/ER-EIA:P<0.001,r=0.38,一致性=83%,敏感性=86%,特异性=77%;ER-ICA/DCC:P<0.05,r=0.22,一致性=77%,敏感性=85%,特异性=63%;ER-EIA/DCC:P<0.001,r=0.60)。如先前报道,两种免疫测定法显示出良好的一致性。与参考DCC发现的较弱但仍显著的相关性可能是由于肿瘤ER含量的异质性。这一假设得到了我们系列中16例患者多次FNA的ER-ICA检测结果变异性的支持。使用多方向FNA略微改善了结果。然而,ER-ICA似乎是一种良好的半定量方法,可能有助于抗雌激素治疗转移灶的随访,特别是对于DCC无法检测的小病灶。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验