Department of Botany and Plant Sciences, University of California Riverside, Riverside, California 92512, USA.
Ecol Appl. 2011 Oct;21(7):2637-51. doi: 10.1890/10-1493.1.
Urban ecosystems are subjected to high temperatures--extreme heat events, chronically hot weather, or both-through interactions between local and global climate processes. Urban vegetation may provide a cooling ecosystem service, although many knowledge gaps exist in the biophysical and social dynamics of using this service to reduce climate extremes. To better understand patterns of urban vegetated cooling, the potential water requirements to supply these services, and differential access to these services between residential neighborhoods, we evaluated three decades (1970-2000) of land surface characteristics and residential segregation by income in the Phoenix, Arizona, USA metropolitan region. We developed an ecosystem service trade-offs approach to assess the urban heat riskscape, defined as the spatial variation in risk exposure and potential human vulnerability to extreme heat. In this region, vegetation provided nearly a 25 degrees C surface cooling compared to bare soil on low-humidity summer days; the magnitude of this service was strongly coupled to air temperature and vapor pressure deficits. To estimate the water loss associated with land-surface cooling, we applied a surface energy balance model. Our initial estimates suggest 2.7 mm/d of water may be used in supplying cooling ecosystem services in the Phoenix region on a summer day. The availability and corresponding resource use requirements of these ecosystem services had a strongly positive relationship with neighborhood income in the year 2000. However, economic stratification in access to services is a recent development: no vegetation-income relationship was observed in 1970, and a clear trend of increasing correlation was evident through 2000. To alleviate neighborhood inequality in risks from extreme heat through increased vegetation and evaporative cooling, large increases in regional water use would be required. Together, these results suggest the need for a systems evaluation of the benefits, costs, spatial structure, and temporal trajectory for the use of ecosystem services to moderate climate extremes. Increasing vegetation is one strategy for moderating regional climate changes in urban areas and simultaneously providing multiple ecosystem services. However, vegetation has economic, water, and social equity implications that vary dramatically across neighborhoods and need to be managed through informed environmental policies.
城市生态系统受到高温的影响——极端高温事件、长期炎热天气,或两者兼而有之——这是通过局部和全球气候过程之间的相互作用产生的。城市植被可以提供冷却生态系统服务,尽管在利用这种服务来减少气候极端事件方面存在许多知识空白。为了更好地了解城市植被冷却的模式、提供这些服务的潜在水资源需求,以及不同居民社区之间获得这些服务的差异,我们评估了美国亚利桑那州凤凰城大都市地区 30 年来(1970-2000 年)的土地表面特征和按收入划分的居民隔离情况。我们开发了一种生态系统服务权衡方法来评估城市热风险景观,即风险暴露的空间变化和人类对极端高温的潜在脆弱性。在这个地区,植被在夏季低湿度的日子里提供了近 25 摄氏度的地表冷却效果,比裸土高;这种服务的规模与空气温度和蒸汽压亏缺密切相关。为了估计与地表冷却相关的水损失,我们应用了一个地表能量平衡模型。我们的初步估计表明,在凤凰城地区,夏季一天可能需要 2.7 毫米/天的水来供应冷却生态系统服务。这些生态系统服务的可用性及其相应的资源利用要求与 2000 年的社区收入呈正相关关系。然而,服务获取方面的经济分层是最近才出现的情况:1970 年没有观察到植被-收入关系,而到 2000 年,这种相关性的明显趋势越来越明显。为了通过增加植被和蒸发冷却来缓解极端高温风险造成的邻里不平等,需要大幅增加区域用水量。总的来说,这些结果表明需要对利用生态系统服务来缓解气候极端事件的效益、成本、空间结构和时间轨迹进行系统评估。增加植被是调节城市地区区域气候变化并同时提供多种生态系统服务的一种策略。然而,植被具有经济、水和社会公平方面的影响,这些影响在不同社区之间差异巨大,需要通过明智的环境政策来管理。