Suppr超能文献

比较哌甲酯和托莫西汀治疗儿童和青少年注意缺陷多动障碍的疗效和可接受性:荟萃分析。

Comparative efficacy and acceptability of methylphenidate and atomoxetine in treatment of attention deficit hyperactivity disorder in children and adolescents: a meta-analysis.

机构信息

Department of Psychological Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Colombo, Sri Lanka.

出版信息

BMC Psychiatry. 2011 Nov 10;11:176. doi: 10.1186/1471-244X-11-176.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Psychostimulants and non stimulants are effective in the treatment of ADHD. Efficacy of both methylphenidate and atomoxetine has been established in placebo controlled trials. Direct comparison of efficacy is now possible due to availability of results from several head-to-head trials of these two medications.

METHODS

All published, randomized, open label or double blind trials, comparing efficacy of methylphenidate with atomoxetine, in treatment of ADHD in children, diagnosed using DSM-IV™ criteria were included. The outcome studied was ADHDRS-IVParent:Inv score. The standardized mean difference (SMD) was used as a measure of effect size.

RESULTS

Nine randomized trials comparing methylphenidate and atomoxetine, with a total of 2762 participants were included. Meta-analysis did not find a significant difference in efficacy between methylphenidate and atomoxetine (SMD=0.09, 95% CI -0.08-0.26) (Z=1.06, p=0.29). Synthesis of data from eight trials found no significant difference in response rates (RR=0.93 95% CI 0.76-1.14, p=0.49). Sub group analysis showed a significant standardized mean difference favouring OROS methylphenidate (SMD=0.32, 95% CI 0.12-0.53 (Z=3.05, p<0.002). Immediate release methylphenidate was not superior to atomoxetine (SMD=-0.04, 95% CI -0.19-0.12) (Z=0.46, p=0.64). Excluding open label trials did not significantly alter the effect size (SMD=0.08, 95% CI -0.04-0.21) (Z=1.27, p=0.20). All-cause discontinuation was used as a measure of acceptability. There was no significant difference in all cause discontinuation between atomoxetine and methylphenidate (RR 1.22, 95% CI 0.87-1.71). There was significant heterogeneity among the studies (p=0.002, I2=67%). Subgroup analysis demonstrated the heterogeneity to be due to the open label trials (p=0.001, I2=81%).

CONCLUSIONS

In general atomoxetine and methylphenidate have comparable efficacy and equal acceptability in treatment of ADHD in children and adolescents. However OROS methylphenidate is more effective than atomoxetine and may be considered as first line treatment in treatment of ADHD in children and adolescents.

摘要

背景

兴奋剂和非兴奋剂在治疗 ADHD 方面都有效。在安慰剂对照试验中已经证实了哌甲酯和托莫西汀的疗效。由于现在可以获得这两种药物的多项头对头试验的结果,因此可以直接比较疗效。

方法

纳入所有已发表的、随机的、开放标签或双盲试验,这些试验比较了哌甲酯与托莫西汀在符合 DSM-IV™标准的儿童 ADHD 治疗中的疗效。研究的结局是 ADHD-RS-IVParent:Inv 评分。采用标准化均数差(SMD)作为效应量的度量。

结果

纳入了 9 项比较哌甲酯和托莫西汀疗效的随机试验,共有 2762 名参与者。荟萃分析未发现哌甲酯和托莫西汀之间的疗效存在显著差异(SMD=0.09,95%CI-0.08-0.26)(Z=1.06,p=0.29)。对 8 项试验数据的综合分析发现,应答率无显著差异(RR=0.93,95%CI 0.76-1.14,p=0.49)。亚组分析显示,OROS 哌甲酯显著有利于标准化均数差(SMD=0.32,95%CI 0.12-0.53(Z=3.05,p<0.002)。速释哌甲酯并不优于托莫西汀(SMD=-0.04,95%CI-0.19-0.12)(Z=0.46,p=0.64)。排除开放标签试验并未显著改变效应大小(SMD=0.08,95%CI-0.04-0.21)(Z=1.27,p=0.20)。全因停药被用作可接受性的衡量标准。托莫西汀和哌甲酯的全因停药率无显著差异(RR 1.22,95%CI 0.87-1.71)。研究之间存在显著的异质性(p=0.002,I2=67%)。亚组分析表明,这种异质性归因于开放标签试验(p=0.001,I2=81%)。

结论

总体而言,托莫西汀和哌甲酯在治疗儿童和青少年 ADHD 方面具有相似的疗效和可接受性。然而,OROS 哌甲酯比托莫西汀更有效,可考虑作为儿童和青少年 ADHD 治疗的一线药物。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6328/3229459/7d62704d288b/1471-244X-11-176-1.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验