Suppr超能文献

计算机生成的三维喉部模型在高级学习者解剖学教学中的作用。

Role of a computer-generated three-dimensional laryngeal model in anatomy teaching for advanced learners.

作者信息

Tan S, Hu A, Wilson T, Ladak H, Haase P, Fung K

机构信息

Department of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario, Canada.

出版信息

J Laryngol Otol. 2012 Apr;126(4):395-401. doi: 10.1017/S0022215111002830. Epub 2011 Nov 11.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

(1) To investigate the efficacy of a computer-generated three-dimensional laryngeal model for laryngeal anatomy teaching; (2) to explore the relationship between students' spatial ability and acquisition of anatomical knowledge; and (3) to assess participants' opinion of the computerised model.

SUBJECTS AND METHODS

Forty junior doctors were randomised to undertake laryngeal anatomy study supplemented by either a three-dimensional computer model or two-dimensional images. Outcome measurements comprised a laryngeal anatomy test, the modified Vandenberg and Kuse mental rotation test, and an opinion survey.

RESULTS

Mean scores ± standard deviations for the anatomy test were 15.7 ± 2.0 for the 'three dimensions' group and 15.5 ± 2.3 for the 'standard' group (p = 0.7222). Pearson's correlation between the rotation test scores and the scores for the spatial ability questions in the anatomy test was 0.4791 (p = 0.086, n = 29). Opinion survey answers revealed significant differences in respondents' perceptions of the clarity and 'user friendliness' of, and their preferences for, the three-dimensional model as regards anatomical study.

CONCLUSION

The three-dimensional computer model was equivalent to standard two-dimensional images, for the purpose of laryngeal anatomy teaching. There was no association between students' spatial ability and functional anatomy learning. However, students preferred to use the three-dimensional model.

摘要

目的

(1)研究计算机生成的三维喉部模型在喉部解剖教学中的效果;(2)探讨学生空间能力与解剖学知识掌握之间的关系;(3)评估参与者对计算机模型的看法。

对象与方法

40名初级医生被随机分为两组,一组采用三维计算机模型辅助进行喉部解剖学习,另一组采用二维图像辅助学习。结果测量包括喉部解剖测试、改良的范登伯格和库斯心理旋转测试以及一项意见调查。

结果

“三维”组解剖测试的平均得分±标准差为15.7±2.0,“标准”组为15.5±2.3(p = 0.7222)。旋转测试得分与解剖测试中空间能力问题得分之间的皮尔逊相关系数为0.4791(p = 0.086,n = 29)。意见调查答案显示,在解剖学学习方面,受访者对三维模型的清晰度、“用户友好性”及其偏好的看法存在显著差异。

结论

就喉部解剖教学而言,三维计算机模型与标准二维图像效果相当。学生的空间能力与功能解剖学学习之间没有关联。然而,学生更喜欢使用三维模型。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验