• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Neural insensitivity to upticks in value is associated with the disposition effect.对价值上升的神经不敏感性与处置效应有关。
Neuroimage. 2012 Feb 15;59(4):4086-93. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.10.081. Epub 2011 Nov 4.
2
A prospect theory explanation of the disposition to trade losing investments for less than market price.前景理论对以低于市场价格交易亏损投资倾向的解释。
Psychol Rep. 2002 Jun;90(3 Pt 1):851-7. doi: 10.2466/pr0.2002.90.3.851.
3
Debiasing the disposition effect by reducing the saliency of information about a stock's purchase price.通过降低有关股票购买价格信息的显著性来消除处置效应偏差。
J Econ Behav Organ. 2014 Nov 1;107(Pt B):541-552. doi: 10.1016/j.jebo.2014.01.017.
4
Frontal, Striatal, and Medial Temporal Sensitivity to Value Distinguishes Risk-Taking from Risk-Aversive Older Adults during Decision Making.额叶、纹状体和内侧颞叶对价值的敏感性在决策过程中区分了冒险型与规避风险型老年人。
J Neurosci. 2016 Dec 7;36(49):12498-12509. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1386-16.2016.
5
Individual differences in risk preference predict neural responses during financial decision-making.风险偏好的个体差异可预测金融决策过程中的神经反应。
Brain Res. 2009 Sep 22;1290:28-51. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2009.06.078. Epub 2009 Jul 2.
6
Differential neurobiological effects of expert advice on risky choice in adolescents and adults.专家建议对青少年和成年人风险选择的神经生物学差异影响。
Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci. 2012 Jun;7(5):557-67. doi: 10.1093/scan/nss050. Epub 2012 May 3.
7
[Risk-taking in adolescence: A neuroeconomics approach].[青少年的冒险行为:一种神经经济学方法]
Encephale. 2010 Apr;36(2):147-54. doi: 10.1016/j.encep.2009.06.004. Epub 2009 Sep 22.
8
Neural foundations of risk-return trade-off in investment decisions.投资决策中的风险-收益权衡的神经基础。
Neuroimage. 2010 Feb 1;49(3):2556-63. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2009.10.060. Epub 2009 Oct 29.
9
Why Do Irrelevant Alternatives Matter? An fMRI-TMS Study of Context-Dependent Preferences.为何无关选项至关重要?一项关于情境依赖偏好的功能磁共振成像-经颅磁刺激研究。
J Neurosci. 2017 Nov 29;37(48):11647-11661. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2307-16.2017. Epub 2017 Nov 6.
10
Neurocircuits underlying cognition-emotion interaction in a social decision making context.社交决策情境下认知-情绪相互作用的神经回路。
Neuroimage. 2012 Nov 1;63(2):843-57. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.07.017. Epub 2012 Jul 17.

引用本文的文献

1
When the disposition effect proves to be rational: Experimental evidence from professional traders.当处置效应被证明是合理的:来自专业交易者的实验证据。
Front Psychol. 2023 Feb 23;14:1091922. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1091922. eCollection 2023.
2
An ALE Meta-Analysis on Investment Decision-Making.关于投资决策的ALE元分析
Brain Sci. 2021 Mar 21;11(3):399. doi: 10.3390/brainsci11030399.
3
Psychophysiological correlates of the disposition effect.处置效应的心理生理学相关性。
PLoS One. 2013;8(1):e54542. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0054542. Epub 2013 Jan 23.

本文引用的文献

1
Using Neural Data to Test A Theory of Investor Behavior: An Application to Realization Utility.利用神经数据检验投资者行为理论:实现效用的应用
J Finance. 2014 Apr 1;69(2):907-946. doi: 10.1111/jofi.12126.
2
From bad to worse: striatal coding of the relative value of painful decisions.每况愈下:痛苦决策相对价值的纹状体编码
Front Neurosci. 2010 Oct 26;4:176. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2010.00176. eCollection 2010.
3
Dopamine signals for reward value and risk: basic and recent data.多巴胺信号与奖励价值和风险:基础与近期数据。
Behav Brain Funct. 2010 Apr 23;6:24. doi: 10.1186/1744-9081-6-24.
4
Neural correlates of value, risk, and risk aversion contributing to decision making under risk.价值、风险和风险厌恶的神经关联对风险决策的影响。
J Neurosci. 2009 Oct 7;29(40):12574-83. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2614-09.2009.
5
Separate neural mechanisms underlie choices and strategic preferences in risky decision making.不同的神经机制构成了风险决策中的选择和策略偏好的基础。
Neuron. 2009 May 28;62(4):593-602. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2009.04.007.
6
Functional dissociations of risk and reward processing in the medial prefrontal cortex.内侧前额叶皮质中风险与奖赏处理的功能分离
Cereb Cortex. 2009 May;19(5):1019-27. doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhn147. Epub 2008 Oct 8.
7
Predicting health behaviors with an experimental measure of risk preference.用风险偏好的实验性测量来预测健康行为。
J Health Econ. 2008 Sep;27(5):1260-74. doi: 10.1016/j.jhealeco.2008.05.011. Epub 2008 Jun 7.
8
Human insula activation reflects risk prediction errors as well as risk.人类脑岛激活反映了风险预测误差以及风险。
J Neurosci. 2008 Mar 12;28(11):2745-52. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4286-07.2008.
9
The neural correlates of subjective value during intertemporal choice.跨期选择过程中主观价值的神经关联。
Nat Neurosci. 2007 Dec;10(12):1625-33. doi: 10.1038/nn2007. Epub 2007 Nov 4.
10
Orbitofrontal cortex encodes willingness to pay in everyday economic transactions.眶额皮质在日常经济交易中编码支付意愿。
J Neurosci. 2007 Sep 12;27(37):9984-8. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2131-07.2007.

对价值上升的神经不敏感性与处置效应有关。

Neural insensitivity to upticks in value is associated with the disposition effect.

机构信息

Department of Economics, Emory University, 1602 Fishburne Drive, Atlanta, GA 30322, USA.

出版信息

Neuroimage. 2012 Feb 15;59(4):4086-93. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.10.081. Epub 2011 Nov 4.

DOI:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.10.081
PMID:22079448
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3288460/
Abstract

The disposition effect is a phenomenon in which investors hold onto losing assets longer than they hold onto gaining assets. In this study, we used functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) to measure the response of valuation regions in the brain during the decision to keep or to sell an asset that followed a random walk in price. The most common explanation for the disposition effect is preference-based: namely, that people are risk-averse over gains and risk-seeking over losses. This explanation would predict correlations between individuals' risk-preferences, the magnitude of their disposition effect, and activation in valuation structures of the brain. We did not observe these correlations. Nor did we find evidence for a realization utility explanation, which would predict differential responses in valuation regions during the decision to sell versus keep an asset that correlated with the magnitude of the disposition effect. Instead, we found an attenuated ventral striatum response to upticks in value below the purchase price in some individuals with a large disposition effect. Given the role of the striatum in signaling prediction error, the blunted striatal response is consistent with the expectation that an asset will rise when it is below the purchase price, thus spurring loss-holding behavior. This suggests that for some individuals, the disposition effect is likely driven by a belief that the asset will eventually return to the purchase price, also known as mean reversion.

摘要

处置效应是指投资者持有亏损资产的时间长于持有盈利资产的时间的现象。在这项研究中,我们使用功能磁共振成像(fMRI)来测量在随机价格波动后决定持有或出售资产时大脑中估值区域的反应。处置效应最常见的解释是基于偏好的:即人们对收益持风险规避态度,对损失持风险寻求态度。这个解释预测了个体风险偏好、处置效应的幅度和大脑估值结构的激活之间的相关性。我们没有观察到这些相关性。我们也没有发现实现效用解释的证据,该解释预测在出售与保留资产的决策中,估值区域的反应会因处置效应的幅度而有所不同。相反,我们发现一些具有较大处置效应的个体,在价值低于购买价的情况下,腹侧纹状体对价值的上涨反应减弱。鉴于纹状体在预测误差信号中的作用,纹状体反应迟钝与以下预期一致,即当资产低于购买价时,它将上涨,从而刺激持有亏损资产的行为。这表明,对于一些人来说,处置效应可能是由一种信念驱动的,即资产最终将回到购买价,也称为均值回归。