Suppr超能文献

一项为期一年的研究者盲法随机多中心试验,比较每日一次 2.4 克艾司奥美拉唑与每日三次 800 毫克艾司奥美拉唑用于溃疡性结肠炎维持缓解的疗效。

One-year investigator-blind randomized multicenter trial comparing Asacol 2.4 g once daily with 800 mg three times daily for maintenance of remission in ulcerative colitis.

机构信息

Department of Medicine, University Hospital of Wales, Cardiff, UK.

出版信息

Inflamm Bowel Dis. 2012 Oct;18(10):1885-93. doi: 10.1002/ibd.21938. Epub 2011 Nov 13.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Mesalazine (Asacol) is still widely prescribed in divided doses for ulcerative colitis (UC), despite evidence that adherence is improved by once-daily (OD) prescribing. We aimed to investigate whether OD Asacol was as effective as three times (TDS) daily dosing, and to evaluate the role of treatment adherence.

METHODS

An investigator-blind randomized trial was undertaken comparing OD Asacol (three 800 mg tablets) versus one 800 mg TDS in maintenance of remission of UC over 1 year. The primary endpoint was relapse rate, and noninferiority would be concluded if the lower limit of the two-sided 95% confidence interval (CI) of the difference in proportions relapsing (TDS-OD) exceeded -10%. Adherence was measured by tablet counts and self-reported adherence. A subgroup of patients used a bottle cap that recorded all bottle opening events.

RESULTS

In all, 213 patients were randomized. In the intention-to-treat (ITT) population, relapse rates were 31% (95% CI 22%-40%) in the OD and 45% (95% CI 35%-54%) in the TDS group. Primary analysis confirmed the noninferiority of OD dosing. Two of the study populations, ITT and per-protocol (PP), showed potential superiority of OD dosing. All measures of adherence showed that it was significantly better in the OD group. Multivariate analysis, however, showed OD dosing was associated with lower relapse risk independently of adherence.

CONCLUSIONS

OD dosing with Asacol 2.4 g is as safe and effective as TDS dosing, and secondary analysis confirmed significantly reduced relapse rates. The benefit, however, was clinically borderline and may relate in part to ease of adherence.

摘要

背景

尽管有证据表明每日一次(OD)给药可提高患者的依从性,但美沙拉嗪(Asacol)仍广泛用于溃疡性结肠炎(UC)的分剂量治疗。我们旨在研究 OD 美沙拉嗪是否与每日三次(TDS)给药一样有效,并评估治疗依从性的作用。

方法

我们进行了一项研究者盲法随机试验,比较了在溃疡性结肠炎维持缓解 1 年期间,OD 美沙拉嗪(三片 800mg 片剂)与 TDS 一日 800mg 的疗效。主要终点为复发率,如果 TDS-OD 复发比例差值的双侧 95%置信区间(CI)下限超过-10%,则认为等效性成立。通过药片计数和自我报告的依从性来测量依从性。一小部分患者使用了一个记录所有瓶盖开启事件的瓶盖。

结果

共有 213 名患者被随机分配。在意向治疗(ITT)人群中,OD 组的复发率为 31%(95%CI 22%-40%),TDS 组为 45%(95%CI 35%-54%)。主要分析证实了 OD 给药的非劣效性。ITT 和符合方案(PP)两个研究人群均显示 OD 给药具有潜在的优越性。所有依从性测量均表明 OD 组的依从性明显更好。然而,多变量分析显示,OD 给药与较低的复发风险独立相关,而与依从性无关。

结论

OD 剂量的 Asacol 2.4g 与 TDS 剂量一样安全有效,二次分析证实复发率显著降低。然而,获益在临床上处于边缘状态,这可能部分与依从性的提高有关。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2618/3746130/41edbd5494c9/ibd0018-1885-f1.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验