Department of Philosophy, UNC Charlotte, NC, USA.
J Law Med Ethics. 2011 Winter;39(4):649-61. doi: 10.1111/j.1748-720X.2011.00632.x.
The legitimacy of clinical ethics consultation is often implied to rest on the legitimacy of moral expertise. In turn, moral expertise seems subject to many serious critiques, the success of which implies that clinical ethics consultation is illegitimate. I explore a number of these critiques, and forward "ethics expertise," as distinct from "moral expertise," as a way of avoiding these critiques. I argue that "ethics expertise" succeeds in avoiding most of the critiques, captures what clinical ethics consultants might justifiably do, and expresses a subject matter which can be taught and assessed.
临床伦理咨询的合法性通常被认为是基于道德专业知识的合法性。反过来,道德专业知识似乎受到许多严厉的批评,这些批评的成功意味着临床伦理咨询是不合法的。我探讨了其中的一些批评,并提出了“伦理专业知识”,以区别于“道德专业知识”,作为避免这些批评的一种方式。我认为,“伦理专业知识”成功地避免了大多数批评,抓住了临床伦理顾问合理的做法,并表达了一个可以教授和评估的主题。