Suppr超能文献

基于互联网的减肥干预中身体活动和饮食行为的改变:比较两种多行为改变指标。

Physical activity and dietary behavior change in Internet-based weight loss interventions: comparing two multiple-behavior change indices.

机构信息

Joint Doctoral Program in Public Health, University of California, San Diego and San Diego State University, 3900 Fifth Avenue, Suite 310, San Diego, CA 92103, USA.

出版信息

Prev Med. 2012 Jan;54(1):50-4. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2011.10.018. Epub 2011 Nov 3.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the effects of two Internet-based weight loss interventions on physical activity (PA) and dietary behaviors using two approaches for computing combined behavior change.

METHOD

Participants were 352 overweight/obese women and men completing 12-month interventions in San Diego, California during 2002-2007. Moderate-to-vigorous PA (MVPA) and sedentary time were measured with accelerometers, and dietary fat and fruit and vegetable intake were assessed with food frequency questionnaires. Longitudinal analyses tested the effect of the intervention on combined health behavior change quantified using a standardized residualized change index (SRCI) and a risk factor change index (RFCI).

RESULTS

At baseline, participants engaged in an average of 153 min/week of MVPA and 525 min/day of sedentary time, and consumed 37% of calories from fat and <3 fruits and vegetables per day. The interventions had a significant effect on combined behavior change as measured with each approach (p<0.001). The intervention effect was larger (p<0.001) when evaluated using the SRCI (standardized regression coefficient [Beta]=0.30) than the RFCI (β=-0.18).

CONCLUSION

Interventions that target both PA and dietary behaviors appear effective. The SRCI was more sensitive for evaluating the intervention, but the RFCI may be easier to use for communicating public health significance.

摘要

目的

通过两种计算综合行为变化的方法,研究两种基于互联网的减肥干预措施对身体活动(PA)和饮食行为的影响。

方法

2002 年至 2007 年期间,在加利福尼亚州圣地亚哥的 352 名超重/肥胖女性和男性参与者完成了为期 12 个月的干预。通过加速度计测量中等至剧烈体力活动(MVPA)和久坐时间,通过食物频率问卷评估膳食脂肪和水果及蔬菜摄入量。纵向分析测试了干预对使用标准化残差变化指数(SRCI)和风险因素变化指数(RFCI)量化的综合健康行为变化的影响。

结果

在基线时,参与者每周平均进行 153 分钟的 MVPA 和 525 分钟的久坐时间,每天摄入 37%的卡路里来自脂肪,<3 份水果和蔬菜。两种方法均显示干预对综合行为变化有显著影响(p<0.001)。使用 SRCI(标准化回归系数[Beta]=0.30)评估时,干预效果更大(p<0.001),而使用 RFCI(β=-0.18)时则较小。

结论

针对 PA 和饮食行为的干预措施似乎有效。SRCI 更有助于评估干预效果,但 RFCI 可能更便于传达公共卫生意义。

相似文献

2
Caregiver involvement in interventions for improving children's dietary intake and physical activity behaviors.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Jan 5;1(1):CD012547. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012547.pub2.
3
Changes in physical activity across a 6-month weight loss intervention in adolescents with intellectual and developmental disabilities.
J Intellect Disabil Res. 2022 Jun;66(6):545-557. doi: 10.1111/jir.12909. Epub 2021 Dec 16.
5
8
Physical activity, diet and BMI in children aged 6-8 years: a cross-sectional analysis.
BMJ Open. 2014 Jun 5;4(6):e005001. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2014-005001.
10
Lifestyle Behaviors in Metabolically Healthy and Unhealthy Overweight and Obese Women: A Preliminary Study.
PLoS One. 2015 Sep 18;10(9):e0138548. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0138548. eCollection 2015.

引用本文的文献

1
Evaluation of Eating Habits and Their Impact on Health among Adolescents and Young Adults: A Cross-Sectional Study.
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Apr 10;18(8):3996. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18083996.
2
Social Cognitive Theories and Electronic Health Design: Scoping Review.
JMIR Hum Factors. 2019 Jul 19;6(3):e11544. doi: 10.2196/11544.
3
Sustainable Lifestyle Change-Participatory Design of Support Together with Persons with Obesity in the Third Age.
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2016 Dec 16;13(12):1248. doi: 10.3390/ijerph13121248.
4
Is nutrient intake associated with physical activity levels in healthy young adults?
Public Health Nutr. 2016 Aug;19(11):1983-9. doi: 10.1017/S1368980015003717. Epub 2016 Feb 22.
5
Validation of psychosocial scales for physical activity in university students.
Rev Saude Publica. 2015;49:47. doi: 10.1590/S0034-8910.2015049005465. Epub 2015 Aug 7.

本文引用的文献

1
Outcomes of a 12-month web-based intervention for overweight and obese men.
Ann Behav Med. 2011 Dec;42(3):391-401. doi: 10.1007/s12160-011-9296-7.
2
Improving physical activity and dietary behaviours with single or multiple health behaviour interventions? A synthesis of meta-analyses and reviews.
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2010 Apr;7(4):1720-43. doi: 10.3390/ijerph7041720. Epub 2010 Apr 16.
3
Multiple health behavior changes and co-variation in a telephone counseling trial.
Ann Behav Med. 2010 Jun;39(3):250-7. doi: 10.1007/s12160-010-9188-2.
4
Methods of quantifying change in multiple risk factor interventions.
Prev Med. 2008 Mar;46(3):260-5. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2007.07.035. Epub 2007 Aug 15.
5
Multiple health behavior change research: an introduction and overview.
Prev Med. 2008 Mar;46(3):181-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2008.02.001. Epub 2008 Feb 6.
6
Amount of time spent in sedentary behaviors in the United States, 2003-2004.
Am J Epidemiol. 2008 Apr 1;167(7):875-81. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwm390. Epub 2008 Feb 25.
7
Breaks in sedentary time: beneficial associations with metabolic risk.
Diabetes Care. 2008 Apr;31(4):661-6. doi: 10.2337/dc07-2046. Epub 2008 Feb 5.
8
Transtheoretical model-based multiple behavior intervention for weight management: effectiveness on a population basis.
Prev Med. 2008 Mar;46(3):238-46. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2007.09.010. Epub 2007 Oct 23.
9
Conducting accelerometer-based activity assessments in field-based research.
Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2005 Nov;37(11 Suppl):S531-43. doi: 10.1249/01.mss.0000185657.86065.98.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验