Department of Thoracic Surgery, Chinese People's Liberation Army General Hospital, Beijing 100853, China.
Chin Med J (Engl). 2011 Oct;124(20):3244-8.
BACKGROUND: Early detection and diagnosis is urgent for the sake of effective treatment strategy for lung cancer. However, a convenient, economical and relatively precise method is not available. We here report a prospective study to find the possible value of the combined use of four popular tumor markers in the early diagnosis of lung cancer among patients with suspicious nodules in the lung. METHODS: Six hundred and sixty inpatients with suspicious nodules in the lung were divided into a lung cancer group and a benign pulmonary tumor group according to post-operative histological examinations. Serum levels of four tumor markers including squamous cell carcinoma antigen (SCC), carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA), Cyfra 21-1 and neuron specific enolase (NSE) were assayed for each patient. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were constructed for each tumor marker. The power of lung cancer diagnosis of each tumor marker, as well as a combination of them were analyzed and compared. RESULTS: The serum levels (median, range) of SCC, CEA, Cyfra 21-1 and NSE were 0.44 (0.01 - 35.70) ng/ml, 2.49 (0.30 - 26.78) ng/ml, 2.30 (0.82 - 73.33) ng/ml and 10.54 (0.10 - 56.41) ng/ml respectively in lung cancer group, and were 0.32 (0.01 - 0.90) ng/ml, 1.60 (0.20 - 8.93) ng/ml, 1.41 (0.72 - 4.82) ng/ml and 9.36 (6.56 - 24.24) ng/ml respectively in the benign pulmonary tumor group. The difference in each tumor marker between the two groups was significant (P < 0.05). The ROCs of SCC, CEA, Cyfra 21-1 and NSE were 0.702 (95%CI, 0.654 - 0.751), 0.611 (95%CI, 0.563 - 0.659), 0.650 (95%CI, 0.601 - 0.700) and 0.598 (95%CI, 0.542 - 0.654) respectively, indicating very low power of these four tumor markers. When a combination of SCC, CEA, Cyfra 21-1 and NSE were employed, the diagnosis power was strengthened. CONCLUSION: SCC, CEA, Cyfra 21-1 and NSE are valuable in the early diagnosis of lung cancer among suspicious nodules in the lung, especially when they were assayed together for one patient.
背景:为了制定有效的治疗策略,肺癌的早期检测和诊断迫在眉睫。然而,目前还没有一种方便、经济且相对精确的方法。我们在此报告一项前瞻性研究,旨在探讨联合使用四种常见肿瘤标志物在疑似肺部结节患者中的早期肺癌诊断中的可能价值。
方法:根据术后组织学检查,将 660 例疑似肺部结节的住院患者分为肺癌组和良性肺肿瘤组。检测每位患者的四种肿瘤标志物,包括鳞状细胞癌抗原(SCC)、癌胚抗原(CEA)、细胞角蛋白 21-1(Cyfra 21-1)和神经元特异性烯醇化酶(NSE)的血清水平。为每个肿瘤标志物绘制受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线。分析和比较了每个肿瘤标志物以及它们联合使用时对肺癌的诊断能力。
结果:肺癌组 SCC、CEA、Cyfra 21-1 和 NSE 的血清水平(中位数,范围)分别为 0.44(0.01-35.70)ng/ml、2.49(0.30-26.78)ng/ml、2.30(0.82-73.33)ng/ml 和 10.54(0.10-56.41)ng/ml,良性肺肿瘤组 SCC、CEA、Cyfra 21-1 和 NSE 的血清水平分别为 0.32(0.01-0.90)ng/ml、1.60(0.20-8.93)ng/ml、1.41(0.72-4.82)ng/ml 和 9.36(6.56-24.24)ng/ml。两组间各肿瘤标志物差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05)。SCC、CEA、Cyfra 21-1 和 NSE 的 ROC 曲线分别为 0.702(95%CI,0.654-0.751)、0.611(95%CI,0.563-0.659)、0.650(95%CI,0.601-0.700)和 0.598(95%CI,0.542-0.654),表明这四种肿瘤标志物的诊断能力均较低。当联合检测 SCC、CEA、Cyfra 21-1 和 NSE 时,诊断能力得到增强。
结论:SCC、CEA、Cyfra 21-1 和 NSE 对疑似肺部结节患者的肺癌早期诊断有一定价值,尤其当联合检测时。
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2025-1-9
Sci Rep. 2021-9-24
Zhongguo Fei Ai Za Zhi. 2017-10-20