• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在脑电双频指数引导下瑞芬太尼与丙泊酚或地氟醚的靶控输注:麻醉质量和恢复情况

Target-controlled infusion of remifentanil with propofol or desflurane under bispectral index guidance: quality of anesthesia and recovery profile.

作者信息

Mahli Ahmet, Coskun Demet, Karaca Gozde Inan, Akcali Didem T, Karabiyik Lale, Karadenizli Yener

机构信息

Department of Anaesthesiology and Reanimation, School of Medicine, Gazi University, Besevler, Ankara, Turkey.

出版信息

J Res Med Sci. 2011 May;16(5):611-20.

PMID:22091283
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3214372/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Our objective was to examine the clinical properties of two anesthetic regimens, propofol target-controlled infusion (TCI), or desflurane using remifentanil TCI under bispectral index (BIS) guidance during ear, nose, and throat (ENT) procedures.

METHODS

FORTY CONSENTING PATIENTS WHO SCHEDULED FOR ENT PROCEDURES WERE PROSPECTIVELY STUDIED AND WERE INCLUDED IN ONE OF THE TWO GROUPS: TCI group or desflurane (DES) group. General anesthesia was induced with 3 ng mL(-1) and 4 μg mL(-1) effect site concentrations (Ce) of remifentanil and propofol, respectively, with TCI system. After intubation, while propofol infusion was continued in the TCI group, it was ceased in the DES group and desflurane with an initial delivered fraction of 6% was administered. The Ce of propofol infusion and inspired fraction of desflurane was adjusted in order to keep BIS as 50 ± 10.

RESULTS

General mean values of mean arterial pressure (MAP) and heart rate (HR) for the TCI group was significantly higher than DES group (89.3 mmHg and 72.4 bpm vs. 77.1 mmHg and 69.5 bpm). Early emergence from anesthesia did not significantly differ between the groups. The rate of patients' Aldrete score (ARS) to reach 10 was found to be 100% at the 15(th) min in both groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Bispectral index guided combinations of remifentanil TCI either with propofol TCI or desflurane anesthetic regimens are both suitable for patients undergoing ENT surgery. The lower blood pressure in the remifentanil TCI with desflurane anesthetic regimens may be a significant advantage.

摘要

背景

我们的目的是研究两种麻醉方案的临床特性,即在双谱指数(BIS)引导下,于耳鼻喉(ENT)手术过程中使用丙泊酚靶控输注(TCI)或地氟醚复合瑞芬太尼TCI。

方法

对40例同意接受ENT手术的患者进行前瞻性研究,并将其纳入两组之一:TCI组或地氟醚(DES)组。使用TCI系统,分别以3 ng/mL和4 μg/mL的瑞芬太尼和丙泊酚效应室浓度(Ce)诱导全身麻醉。插管后,TCI组继续输注丙泊酚,DES组则停止输注丙泊酚,开始给予初始浓度为6%的地氟醚。调整丙泊酚输注的Ce和地氟醚的吸入浓度,以使BIS保持在50±10。

结果

TCI组的平均动脉压(MAP)和心率(HR)总体平均值显著高于DES组(89.3 mmHg和72.4次/分钟 vs. 77.1 mmHg和69.5次/分钟)。两组患者麻醉后早期苏醒情况无显著差异。两组患者在第15分钟时Aldrete评分(ARS)达到10分的比例均为100%。

结论

BIS引导下瑞芬太尼TCI联合丙泊酚TCI或地氟醚麻醉方案均适用于接受ENT手术的患者。瑞芬太尼TCI联合地氟醚麻醉方案导致的血压较低可能是一个显著优势。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b263/3214372/5bf4b5e52ac9/JRMS-16-611-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b263/3214372/e7cc416903e6/JRMS-16-611-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b263/3214372/016534836ccc/JRMS-16-611-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b263/3214372/5bf4b5e52ac9/JRMS-16-611-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b263/3214372/e7cc416903e6/JRMS-16-611-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b263/3214372/016534836ccc/JRMS-16-611-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b263/3214372/5bf4b5e52ac9/JRMS-16-611-g006.jpg

相似文献

1
Target-controlled infusion of remifentanil with propofol or desflurane under bispectral index guidance: quality of anesthesia and recovery profile.在脑电双频指数引导下瑞芬太尼与丙泊酚或地氟醚的靶控输注:麻醉质量和恢复情况
J Res Med Sci. 2011 May;16(5):611-20.
2
[Effect of ear point embedding on plasma and effect site concentrations of propofol-remifentanil in elderly patients after target-controlled induction].耳穴埋针对老年患者靶控诱导后丙泊酚-瑞芬太尼血浆及效应室浓度的影响
Zhongguo Zhen Jiu. 2017 Aug 12;37(8):869-873. doi: 10.13703/j.0255-2930.2017.08.017.
3
Relationship between depth of anesthesia and effect-site concentration of propofol during induction with the target-controlled infusion technique in elderly patients.老年患者靶控输注技术诱导期间麻醉深度与丙泊酚效应室浓度的关系
Chin Med J (Engl). 2009 Apr 20;122(8):935-40.
4
Remifentanil versus fentanyl compared in a target-controlled infusion of propofol anesthesia: quality of anesthesia and recovery profile.瑞芬太尼与芬太尼在丙泊酚靶控输注麻醉中比较:麻醉质量和恢复特征。
J Anesth. 2010 Jun;24(3):373-9. doi: 10.1007/s00540-010-0898-1. Epub 2010 Mar 13.
5
Bispectral index for monitoring anesthetic depth in patients with severe burns receiving target-controlled infusion of remifentanil and propofol.双谱指数用于监测接受瑞芬太尼和丙泊酚靶控输注的重度烧伤患者的麻醉深度。
Genet Mol Res. 2015 Jul 13;14(3):7597-604. doi: 10.4238/2015.July.13.3.
6
[Anesthesia recovery comparison between remifentanil-propofol and remifentanil-desflurane guided by Bispectral Index monitoring].脑电双频指数监测下瑞芬太尼-丙泊酚与瑞芬太尼-地氟醚麻醉恢复情况比较
Rev Bras Anestesiol. 2017 Sep-Oct;67(5):500-507. doi: 10.1016/j.bjan.2017.04.024. Epub 2017 May 25.
7
The effect of remifentanil on the bispectral index change and hemodynamic responses after orotracheal intubation.瑞芬太尼对经口气管插管后双谱指数变化及血流动力学反应的影响。
Anesth Analg. 2000 Jan;90(1):161-7. doi: 10.1097/00000539-200001000-00034.
8
Nitrous oxide prevents movement during orotracheal intubation without affecting BIS value.氧化亚氮可防止经口气管插管期间的肢体活动,且不影响脑电双频指数(BIS)值。
Anesth Analg. 2000 Jul;91(1):130-5. doi: 10.1097/00000539-200007000-00024.
9
The effect of atropine on the bispectral index response to endotracheal intubation during propofol and remifentanil anesthesia.阿托品对依托咪酯和瑞芬太尼麻醉下气管插管时脑电双频指数反应的影响。
J Clin Monit Comput. 2013 Apr;27(2):157-61. doi: 10.1007/s10877-012-9407-4. Epub 2012 Oct 30.
10
Impact of perioperative lidocaine infusion and bis monitorization on remifentanil dosage in hypotensive anesthesia.围手术期输注利多卡因及双监测对低血压麻醉中瑞芬太尼用量的影响
Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci. 2014;18(4):559-65.

引用本文的文献

1
A novel predictive strategy for the incidence of postoperative neurocognitive dysfunction in elderly patients with mild cognitive impairment.一种预测轻度认知障碍老年患者术后神经认知功能障碍发生率的新策略。
Front Aging Neurosci. 2022 Sep 29;14:985406. doi: 10.3389/fnagi.2022.985406. eCollection 2022.
2
Antioxidant Effect of Propofol in Gliomas and Its Association With Divalent Metal Transporter 1.丙泊酚在胶质瘤中的抗氧化作用及其与二价金属转运蛋白1的关联。
Front Oncol. 2020 Nov 24;10:590931. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2020.590931. eCollection 2020.
3
Inhalation of low-dose desflurane prevents the hemodynamic instability caused by target-controlled infusion of remifentanil and propofol during laparoscopic gynecological surgery: A randomized controlled trial.

本文引用的文献

1
Remifentanil versus fentanyl compared in a target-controlled infusion of propofol anesthesia: quality of anesthesia and recovery profile.瑞芬太尼与芬太尼在丙泊酚靶控输注麻醉中比较:麻醉质量和恢复特征。
J Anesth. 2010 Jun;24(3):373-9. doi: 10.1007/s00540-010-0898-1. Epub 2010 Mar 13.
2
Reduction of pain during induction with target-controlled propofol and remifentanil.使用靶控丙泊酚和瑞芬太尼诱导期间的疼痛减轻。
Br J Anaesth. 2007 Dec;99(6):876-80. doi: 10.1093/bja/aem293.
3
Early recovery, cognitive function and costs of a desflurane inhalational vs. a total intravenous anaesthesia regimen in long-term surgery.
低剂量地氟烷吸入预防腹腔镜妇科手术中靶控输注瑞芬太尼和丙泊酚引起的血流动力学不稳定:一项随机对照试验。
Exp Ther Med. 2021 Jan;21(1):54. doi: 10.3892/etm.2020.9486. Epub 2020 Nov 19.
4
Optimal effect-site concentration of remifentanil to prevent hemodynamic changes during nasotracheal intubation using a video laryngoscope.使用视频喉镜进行鼻气管插管时预防血流动力学变化的瑞芬太尼最佳效应室浓度。
J Dent Anesth Pain Med. 2020 Aug;20(4):195-202. doi: 10.17245/jdapm.2020.20.4.195. Epub 2020 Aug 27.
5
Analysis of anesthesia-controlled operating room time after propofol-based total intravenous anesthesia compared with desflurane anesthesia in functional endoscopic sinus surgery.在功能性鼻内镜鼻窦手术中,比较丙泊酚全凭静脉麻醉与地氟烷麻醉后麻醉控制下手术室时间的分析。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2018 Feb;97(5):e9805. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000009805.
6
Neuroprotection by Propofol Post-Conditioning: Focus on PKMζ/KCC2 Pathway Activity.异丙酚后处理的神经保护作用:聚焦于 PKMζ/KCC2 通路活性。
Cell Mol Neurobiol. 2018 Apr;38(3):691-701. doi: 10.1007/s10571-017-0530-0. Epub 2017 Aug 4.
7
Planning for operating room efficiency and faster anesthesia wake-up time in open major upper abdominal surgery.开放性上腹部大手术中手术室效率及更快麻醉苏醒时间的规划。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2017 Feb;96(7):e6148. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000006148.
8
Comparison of Anesthesia-Controlled Operating Room Time between Propofol-Based Total Intravenous Anesthesia and Desflurane Anesthesia in Open Colorectal Surgery: A Retrospective Study.丙泊酚全凭静脉麻醉与地氟烷麻醉用于开放结直肠手术的麻醉控制手术时间比较:一项回顾性研究
PLoS One. 2016 Oct 25;11(10):e0165407. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0165407. eCollection 2016.
9
Anesthesia for endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography: target-controlled infusion versus standard volatile anesthesia.内镜逆行胰胆管造影术的麻醉:靶控输注与标准挥发性麻醉的比较
Ann Gastroenterol. 2016 Oct-Dec;29(4):530-535. doi: 10.20524/aog.2016.0071. Epub 2016 Jul 14.
长期手术中地氟烷吸入麻醉与全静脉麻醉方案的早期恢复、认知功能及成本
Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2006 Jan;50(1):14-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-6576.2006.00905.x.
4
Target controlled infusion: TCI.靶控输注:TCI。
Minerva Anestesiol. 2005 Jun;71(6):335-7.
5
A comparison of target- and manually controlled infusion propofol and etomidate/desflurane anesthesia in elderly patients undergoing hip fracture surgery.老年髋部骨折手术患者中靶控输注与手动控制输注丙泊酚和依托咪酯/地氟醚麻醉的比较。
Anesth Analg. 2005 May;100(5):1338-1342. doi: 10.1213/01.ANE.0000149542.04833.55.
6
Comparison of recovery profile after ambulatory anesthesia with propofol, isoflurane, sevoflurane and desflurane: a systematic review.丙泊酚、异氟烷、七氟烷和地氟烷用于门诊麻醉后的恢复情况比较:一项系统评价
Anesth Analg. 2004 Mar;98(3):632-41, table of contents. doi: 10.1213/01.ane.0000103187.70627.57.
7
How low can we go?我们能低到什么程度?
Br J Anaesth. 2003 Dec;91(6):771-2. doi: 10.1093/bja/aeg268.
8
Different benefit of bispectal index (BIS) in desflurane and propofol anesthesia.双频指数(BIS)在地氟烷和丙泊酚麻醉中的不同益处。
Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2003 Feb;47(2):165-73. doi: 10.1034/j.1399-6576.2003.00041.x.
9
Comparison of total intravenous anesthesia and sevoflurane-fentanyl anesthesia for outpatient otorhinolaryngeal surgery.全凭静脉麻醉与七氟醚-芬太尼麻醉用于门诊耳鼻喉科手术的比较。
J Clin Anesth. 2002 Aug;14(5):324-8. doi: 10.1016/s0952-8180(02)00367-7.
10
Cost-effectiveness of propofol anesthesia using target-controlled infusion compared with a standard regimen using desflurane.与使用地氟烷的标准方案相比,使用靶控输注的丙泊酚麻醉的成本效益。
Am J Health Syst Pharm. 2002 Jul 15;59(14):1344-50. doi: 10.1093/ajhp/59.14.1344.