• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

非线性模型中的交互项。

Interaction terms in nonlinear models.

机构信息

Division of Health Policy and Management, School of Public Health, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN 55455, USA.

出版信息

Health Serv Res. 2012 Feb;47(1 Pt 1):255-74. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2011.01314.x. Epub 2011 Aug 30.

DOI:10.1111/j.1475-6773.2011.01314.x
PMID:22091735
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3447245/
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To explain the use of interaction terms in nonlinear models.

STUDY DESIGN

We discuss the motivation for including interaction terms in multivariate analyses. We then explain how the straightforward interpretation of interaction terms in linear models changes in nonlinear models, using graphs and equations. We extend the basic results from logit and probit to difference-in-differences models, models with higher powers of explanatory variables, other nonlinear models (including log transformation and ordered models), and panel data models. EMPIRICAL APPLICATION: We show how to calculate and interpret interaction effects using a publicly available Stata data set with a binary outcome. Stata 11 has added several features which make those calculations easier. LIMDEP code also is provided.

CONCLUSIONS

It is important to understand why interaction terms are included in nonlinear models in order to be clear about their substantive interpretation.

摘要

目的

解释非线性模型中交互项的用法。

研究设计

我们讨论了在多元分析中包含交互项的动机。然后,我们使用图表和方程解释了在非线性模型中,交互项在线性模型中的直接解释是如何变化的。我们将基本结果从逻辑回归和概率回归扩展到了差分模型、具有更高解释变量幂次的模型、其他非线性模型(包括对数变换和有序模型)以及面板数据模型。

实证应用

我们使用一个带有二元结果的公共可用 Stata 数据集,展示了如何计算和解释交互效应。Stata 11 增加了几个功能,使得这些计算更加容易。还提供了 LIMDEP 代码。

结论

为了清楚地了解交互项的实质解释,理解为什么在非线性模型中包含交互项是很重要的。

相似文献

1
Interaction terms in nonlinear models.非线性模型中的交互项。
Health Serv Res. 2012 Feb;47(1 Pt 1):255-74. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2011.01314.x. Epub 2011 Aug 30.
2
Log Odds and the Interpretation of Logit Models.对数几率与逻辑回归模型的解释。
Health Serv Res. 2018 Apr;53(2):859-878. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.12712. Epub 2017 May 30.
3
A nonlinear latent class model for joint analysis of multivariate longitudinal data and a binary outcome.用于多变量纵向数据和二元结局联合分析的非线性潜在类别模型。
Stat Med. 2007 May 10;26(10):2229-45. doi: 10.1002/sim.2659.
4
Consistent Partial Least Squares for nonlinear structural equation models.非线性结构方程模型的一致性偏最小二乘法
Psychometrika. 2014 Oct;79(4):585-604. doi: 10.1007/s11336-013-9370-0. Epub 2013 Dec 5.
5
Foundation for nonlinear models with thresholds for longitudinal data.具有纵向数据阈值的非线性模型基础。
J Biopharm Stat. 2000 Nov;10(4):469-80. doi: 10.1081/BIP-100101979.
6
Non-linear mixed models in the analysis of mediated longitudinal data with binary outcomes.具有二项结局的中介纵向数据分析中的非线性混合效应模型。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2012 Jan 24;12:5. doi: 10.1186/1471-2288-12-5.
7
Using marginal standardisation to estimate relative risk without dichotomising continuous outcomes.使用边缘标准化来估计连续结果无需二分类的相对风险。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2019 Jul 29;19(1):165. doi: 10.1186/s12874-019-0778-9.
8
Creation of Interpretable Summary Measures in Displaying Results from Mixed-effects Logit Models.混合效应逻辑模型结果展示中可解释性汇总指标的创建。
J Biom Biostat. 2016 Jun;7(3). doi: 10.4172/2155-6180.1000304. Epub 2016 May 31.
9
Non-linear random effects model for multivariate responses with missing data.用于处理缺失数据的多变量响应的非线性随机效应模型。
Stat Med. 2006 Aug 30;25(16):2817-30. doi: 10.1002/sim.2361.
10
Interaction effects may actually be nonlinear effects in disguise: A review of the problem and potential solutions.交互作用效应实际上可能是伪装了的非线性效应:问题回顾及潜在解决方案。
Addict Behav. 2019 Jul;94:99-108. doi: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2018.09.018. Epub 2018 Sep 18.

引用本文的文献

1
Patient healthcare spending after the No Surprises Act: quasi-experimental difference-in-differences study.《无意外法案》实施后的患者医疗支出:准实验性差分法研究
BMJ. 2025 Aug 27;390:e084803. doi: 10.1136/bmj-2025-084803.
2
Effects of front-of-package nutrition labels in Latine and limited English proficiency populations: A randomized trial.包装正面营养标签对拉丁裔和英语水平有限人群的影响:一项随机试验。
medRxiv. 2025 May 11:2025.05.09.25327177. doi: 10.1101/2025.05.09.25327177.
3
Discrimination, Depression, and Anxiety Among US Adults.美国成年人中的歧视、抑郁和焦虑
JAMA Netw Open. 2025 Mar 3;8(3):e252404. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2025.2404.
4
Health Equity and Hospital Markets: Differences in the Association of Market Concentration and Quality of Care by Patient Race/Ethnicity and Payer.健康公平与医院市场:按患者种族/族裔和支付方划分的市场集中度与医疗质量关联的差异
Med Care. 2025 Mar 18;63(8):565-72. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0000000000002123.
5
Medicaid Spending and Health-Related Social Needs in the North Carolina Healthy Opportunities Pilots Program.北卡罗来纳州健康机会试点项目中的医疗补助支出与健康相关社会需求
JAMA. 2025 Feb 27;333(12):1041-50. doi: 10.1001/jama.2025.1042.
6
Gender disparities in job flexibility, job security, psychological distress, work absenteeism, and work presenteeism among U.S. adults.美国成年人在工作灵活性、工作保障、心理困扰、旷工和出勤主义方面的性别差异。
SSM Popul Health. 2025 Feb 3;29:101761. doi: 10.1016/j.ssmph.2025.101761. eCollection 2025 Mar.
7
Effects of very low nicotine cigarettes, e-cigarettes, and nicotine patches on daily own-cigarette abstinence in a randomized controlled switching trial.极低尼古丁香烟、电子烟和尼古丁贴片对随机对照转换试验中每日自我戒烟的影响。
Drug Alcohol Depend. 2025 Mar 1;268:112576. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2025.112576. Epub 2025 Jan 31.
8
Racial and Ethnic Differences in Low-Value Care Among Older Adults in a Large Statewide Health System.一个大型全州卫生系统中老年人低价值医疗服务的种族和民族差异
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2025 Mar;73(3):900-909. doi: 10.1111/jgs.19369. Epub 2025 Feb 3.
9
Disparities in Access and Utilization of Electronic Health Record Patient Portals.电子健康记录患者门户的获取与使用差异。
J Gen Intern Med. 2025 Jan 22. doi: 10.1007/s11606-025-09359-z.
10
Health Care Utilization and Costs for Older Adults Aging Into Medicare After the Affordable Care Act.《平价医疗法案》实施后步入医疗保险体系的老年人的医疗保健利用情况及费用
JAMA Health Forum. 2025 Jan 3;6(1):e245025. doi: 10.1001/jamahealthforum.2024.5025.

本文引用的文献

1
Child Health and Household Resources in South Africa: Evidence from the Old Age Pension Program.南非的儿童健康与家庭资源:来自老年养老金计划的证据
Am Econ Rev. 2000;90(2):393-8. doi: 10.1257/aer.90.2.393.
2
Alcohol consumption and body weight.饮酒与体重。
Health Econ. 2010 Jul;19(7):814-32. doi: 10.1002/hec.1521.
3
What's the Risk? A simple approach for estimating adjusted risk measures from nonlinear models including logistic regression.风险是什么?一种从包括逻辑回归在内的非线性模型估计调整后风险度量的简单方法。
Health Serv Res. 2009 Feb;44(1):288-302. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2008.00900.x. Epub 2008 Sep 11.
4
Two-stage residual inclusion estimation: addressing endogeneity in health econometric modeling.两阶段残差包含估计:解决健康计量经济学建模中的内生性问题
J Health Econ. 2008 May;27(3):531-43. doi: 10.1016/j.jhealeco.2007.09.009. Epub 2007 Dec 4.
5
Informal care and Medicare expenditures: testing for heterogeneous treatment effects.非正式护理与医疗保险支出:异质性治疗效果检验
J Health Econ. 2008 Jan;27(1):134-56. doi: 10.1016/j.jhealeco.2007.03.002. Epub 2007 Mar 18.
6
Scale of interest versus scale of estimation: comparing alternative estimators for the incremental costs of a comorbidity.关注规模与估计规模:比较合并症增量成本的替代估计量
Health Econ. 2006 Oct;15(10):1091-107. doi: 10.1002/hec.1099.
7
Does prospective payment reduce inpatient length of stay?前瞻性支付是否会缩短住院时间?
Health Econ. 2002 Jul;11(5):377-87. doi: 10.1002/hec.675.
8
Odds ratio or relative risk for cross-sectional data?横断面数据的比值比还是相对危险度?
Int J Epidemiol. 1994 Feb;23(1):201-3. doi: 10.1093/ije/23.1.201.