Tobacco Control Research Group, Department of Health, University of Bath, Bath, United Kingdom.
Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2012 Feb;1248:107-23. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.2011.06202.x. Epub 2011 Nov 17.
Smoking prevalence is higher among disadvantaged groups, and disadvantaged smokers may face higher exposure to tobacco's harms. Uptake may also be higher among those with low socioeconomic status (SES), and quit attempts are less likely to be successful. Studies have suggested that this may be the result of reduced social support for quitting, low motivation to quit, stronger addiction to tobacco, increased likelihood of not completing courses of pharmacotherapy or behavioral support sessions, psychological differences such as lack of self-efficacy, and tobacco industry marketing. Evidence of interventions that work among lower socioeconomic groups is sparse. Raising the price of tobacco products appears to be the tobacco control intervention with the most potential to reduce health inequalities from tobacco. Targeted cessation programs and mass media interventions can also contribute to reducing inequalities. To tackle the high prevalence of smoking among disadvantaged groups, a combination of tobacco control measures is required, and these should be delivered in conjunction with wider attempts to address inequalities in health.
吸烟率在弱势群体中较高,弱势吸烟者可能面临更高的烟草危害暴露风险。社会经济地位较低的人群(SES)的吸烟率可能也较高,戒烟尝试成功的可能性也较低。研究表明,这可能是由于戒烟时社会支持减少、戒烟动机低、对烟草的成瘾性更强、更有可能不完成药物治疗或行为支持课程、缺乏自我效能等心理差异以及烟草行业营销所致。在社会经济地位较低的人群中开展有效干预的证据很少。提高烟草产品价格似乎是减少烟草导致健康不平等的最有潜力的控烟干预措施。有针对性的戒烟计划和大众媒体干预也可以有助于减少不平等。为了解决弱势群体中吸烟率高的问题,需要采取一系列控烟措施,同时还应与更广泛的解决健康不平等的努力相结合。