Dawson Dominic R, DeFrancisco Richard J, Stokol Tracy
Department of Population Medicine and Diagnostic Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, USA.
Vet Clin Pathol. 2011 Dec;40(4):504-512. doi: 10.1111/j.1939-165X.2011.00359.x. Epub 2011 Oct 24.
Species-specific reference intervals are needed for interpretation of laboratory tests. Reference interval studies of alpacas have been limited by low numbers and use of outdated methods.
The aims of this study were to establish reference intervals for hematologic and coagulation tests in alpacas using a laser-based hematology analyzer and a mechanical clot detection coagulation analyzer, respectively; to compare results for automated and manual differential WBC and platelet counts and fibrinogen concentrations; and to examine the effect of herd and sex on hematologic tests in a population of alpacas.
Blood collected from clinically healthy female and male adult alpacas (Vicugna pacos) from 5 herds underwent full CBC analysis using an ADVIA 2120 (n = 65). Blood smears were examined for manual differential WBC counts, platelet estimates, and morphologic examination of blood cells. PCV and plasma protein and heat-precipitable fibrinogen concentration measured by refractometry were also determined. Partial thromboplastin time, prothrombin time, and clottable fibrinogen concentration were measured using a STA Compact analyzer (n = 13). Reference intervals were established using 2.5th and 97.5th percentiles for hematologic analytes and minimum and maximum values for coagulation tests. Automated and manual differential WBC counts, platelet counts, and fibrinogen concentrations were compared. Results were also evaluated for herd- and sex-associated effects.
Hematologic reference intervals for alpacas were similar to those reported previously, except for lower RBC-related results, which showed a herd bias. Correlations between automated and manual neutrophil, lymphocyte, eosinophil, and platelet counts were moderate to good, with weak to poor correlations for monocyte and basophil counts and fibrinogen concentrations. Owing to the low number of samples analyzed, reference intervals for coagulation tests should be considered estimated intervals.
Reference intervals will be useful guides for interpreting hematologic and coagulation results in alpacas, particularly when using the same instrumentation and reagents.
实验室检测结果的解读需要特定物种的参考区间。羊驼的参考区间研究因样本数量少和方法陈旧而受到限制。
本研究的目的是分别使用基于激光的血液分析仪和机械凝血检测凝血分析仪建立羊驼血液学和凝血检测的参考区间;比较自动和手动白细胞分类计数、血小板计数及纤维蛋白原浓度的结果;并研究群体和性别对羊驼群体血液学检测的影响。
从5个羊群中采集临床健康的成年雌性和雄性羊驼(小羊驼)的血液,使用ADVIA 2120进行全血细胞计数分析(n = 65)。检查血涂片以进行手动白细胞分类计数、血小板估计和血细胞形态学检查。还通过折射法测定了红细胞压积、血浆蛋白和热沉淀纤维蛋白原浓度。使用STA Compact分析仪测量部分凝血活酶时间、凝血酶原时间和可凝固纤维蛋白原浓度(n = 13)。使用血液学分析物的第2.5百分位数和第97.5百分位数以及凝血检测的最小值和最大值建立参考区间。比较自动和手动白细胞分类计数、血小板计数和纤维蛋白原浓度。还评估了结果与群体和性别相关的影响。
羊驼的血液学参考区间与先前报道的相似,但红细胞相关结果较低,且存在群体偏差。自动和手动中性粒细胞、淋巴细胞、嗜酸性粒细胞和血小板计数之间的相关性为中度至良好,单核细胞和嗜碱性粒细胞计数及纤维蛋白原浓度的相关性为弱至差。由于分析的样本数量较少,凝血检测的参考区间应视为估计区间。
参考区间将有助于解读羊驼的血液学和凝血结果,特别是在使用相同仪器和试剂时。