Suppr超能文献

单阶段平台转换种植体是否会影响边缘骨水平和种植体稳定性/动度?一项对照临床研究。

Are marginal bone levels and implant stability/mobility affected by single-stage platform switched dental implants? A comparative clinical study.

机构信息

Department of Periodontology, Faculty of Dentistry, Hacettepe University, Ankara, Turkey.

出版信息

Clin Oral Implants Res. 2012 Oct;23(10):1161-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2011.02277.x. Epub 2011 Sep 8.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to evaluate short-term bone level and stability/mobility measurement alterations at platform switched (PS) and standard platform (SP) implants placed in mandibular premolar/molar regions using a single-stage protocol.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Sixteen PS and 16 SP implants restorated with fixed prosthesis were included. Standard implant dimensions were used for both implant systems. After 3 months of osseointegration, implants were connected to abutments and final restorations were performed. Marginal bone loss was measured by standardized periapical radiographs. Implant stability/mobility was determined by resonance frequency analysis (RFA) and mobility measuring (MM) device values. Peri-implant parameters were evaluated with clinical periodontal indices and all parameters were assessed at baseline, 1, 3, and 6 months after the surgery.

RESULTS

After 6 months, all implants showed uneventful healing. Radiographic evaluation showed a mean bone loss of 0.72 mm for PS and 0.56 mm for SP implants, and there were no significant differences between implant types. At 6 months, mean implant stability quotient (ISQ) values were 73.38 and 77 for PS and SP implants, respectively. Mean MM values were -4.75 for PS and -6.38 for SP implants. Mean MM values were lower for SP implants compared to PS implants at all time points. No significant differences were detected between implant types according to clinical peri-implant parameters.

CONCLUSIONS

The micro-gap at crestal level which immediately exposed to the oral cavity in non-submerged two part implants seems to have adverse influence on the marginal bone level.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在评估在单阶段方案中,下颌前磨牙/磨牙区使用平台转换(PS)和标准平台(SP)种植体时短期骨水平和稳定性/活动度测量的变化。

材料和方法

纳入了 16 个 PS 和 16 个 SP 种植体修复的固定义齿。两种种植体系统均使用标准种植体尺寸。在骨整合 3 个月后,将种植体连接到基台,并完成最终修复。通过标准根尖片测量边缘骨丢失。通过共振频率分析(RFA)和活动测量(MM)设备值确定种植体稳定性/活动度。通过临床牙周指数评估种植体周围参数,并在基线、术后 1、3 和 6 个月评估所有参数。

结果

术后 6 个月,所有种植体均愈合良好。影像学评估显示 PS 种植体的平均骨丢失为 0.72mm,SP 种植体为 0.56mm,两种种植体类型之间无显著差异。在 6 个月时,PS 和 SP 种植体的平均种植体稳定性指数(ISQ)值分别为 73.38 和 77。PS 种植体的平均 MM 值为-4.75,SP 种植体为-6.38。在所有时间点,SP 种植体的 MM 值均低于 PS 种植体。根据种植体周围的临床参数,两种种植体类型之间未检测到显著差异。

结论

在非埋植式两段式种植体中,冠方微间隙立即暴露于口腔,似乎对边缘骨水平有不利影响。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验