• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

单阶段平台转换种植体是否会影响边缘骨水平和种植体稳定性/动度?一项对照临床研究。

Are marginal bone levels and implant stability/mobility affected by single-stage platform switched dental implants? A comparative clinical study.

机构信息

Department of Periodontology, Faculty of Dentistry, Hacettepe University, Ankara, Turkey.

出版信息

Clin Oral Implants Res. 2012 Oct;23(10):1161-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2011.02277.x. Epub 2011 Sep 8.

DOI:10.1111/j.1600-0501.2011.02277.x
PMID:22092887
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to evaluate short-term bone level and stability/mobility measurement alterations at platform switched (PS) and standard platform (SP) implants placed in mandibular premolar/molar regions using a single-stage protocol.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Sixteen PS and 16 SP implants restorated with fixed prosthesis were included. Standard implant dimensions were used for both implant systems. After 3 months of osseointegration, implants were connected to abutments and final restorations were performed. Marginal bone loss was measured by standardized periapical radiographs. Implant stability/mobility was determined by resonance frequency analysis (RFA) and mobility measuring (MM) device values. Peri-implant parameters were evaluated with clinical periodontal indices and all parameters were assessed at baseline, 1, 3, and 6 months after the surgery.

RESULTS

After 6 months, all implants showed uneventful healing. Radiographic evaluation showed a mean bone loss of 0.72 mm for PS and 0.56 mm for SP implants, and there were no significant differences between implant types. At 6 months, mean implant stability quotient (ISQ) values were 73.38 and 77 for PS and SP implants, respectively. Mean MM values were -4.75 for PS and -6.38 for SP implants. Mean MM values were lower for SP implants compared to PS implants at all time points. No significant differences were detected between implant types according to clinical peri-implant parameters.

CONCLUSIONS

The micro-gap at crestal level which immediately exposed to the oral cavity in non-submerged two part implants seems to have adverse influence on the marginal bone level.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在评估在单阶段方案中,下颌前磨牙/磨牙区使用平台转换(PS)和标准平台(SP)种植体时短期骨水平和稳定性/活动度测量的变化。

材料和方法

纳入了 16 个 PS 和 16 个 SP 种植体修复的固定义齿。两种种植体系统均使用标准种植体尺寸。在骨整合 3 个月后,将种植体连接到基台,并完成最终修复。通过标准根尖片测量边缘骨丢失。通过共振频率分析(RFA)和活动测量(MM)设备值确定种植体稳定性/活动度。通过临床牙周指数评估种植体周围参数,并在基线、术后 1、3 和 6 个月评估所有参数。

结果

术后 6 个月,所有种植体均愈合良好。影像学评估显示 PS 种植体的平均骨丢失为 0.72mm,SP 种植体为 0.56mm,两种种植体类型之间无显著差异。在 6 个月时,PS 和 SP 种植体的平均种植体稳定性指数(ISQ)值分别为 73.38 和 77。PS 种植体的平均 MM 值为-4.75,SP 种植体为-6.38。在所有时间点,SP 种植体的 MM 值均低于 PS 种植体。根据种植体周围的临床参数,两种种植体类型之间未检测到显著差异。

结论

在非埋植式两段式种植体中,冠方微间隙立即暴露于口腔,似乎对边缘骨水平有不利影响。

相似文献

1
Are marginal bone levels and implant stability/mobility affected by single-stage platform switched dental implants? A comparative clinical study.单阶段平台转换种植体是否会影响边缘骨水平和种植体稳定性/动度?一项对照临床研究。
Clin Oral Implants Res. 2012 Oct;23(10):1161-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2011.02277.x. Epub 2011 Sep 8.
2
The influence of platform switching on clinical, laboratory, and image-based measures: a prospective clinical study.平台转换对临床、实验室及影像学指标的影响:一项前瞻性临床研究。
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2014 Dec;16(6):936-46. doi: 10.1111/cid.12054. Epub 2013 Mar 13.
3
The impact of prosthetic design on the stability, marginal bone loss, peri-implant sulcus fluid volume, and nitric oxide metabolism of conventionally loaded endosseous dental implants: a 12-month clinical study.传统负载型牙种植体的修复体设计对其稳定性、边缘骨吸收、种植体周围龈沟液量及一氧化氮代谢的影响:一项为期12个月的临床研究。
J Periodontol. 2008 Jan;79(1):55-63. doi: 10.1902/jop.2008.070351.
4
Early loading of nonsubmerged titanium implants with a chemically modified sand-blasted and acid-etched surface: 6-month results of a prospective case series study in the posterior mandible focusing on peri-implant crestal bone changes and implant stability quotient (ISQ) values.采用经化学改良的喷砂酸蚀表面的非潜入式钛种植体早期负荷:一项聚焦于种植体周骨变化和种植体稳定性指数(ISQ)值的下颌后牙区前瞻性病例系列研究的 6 个月结果。
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2009 Dec;11(4):338-47. doi: 10.1111/j.1708-8208.2009.00148.x. Epub 2009 Apr 23.
5
Influence of the size of the microgap on crestal bone levels in non-submerged dental implants: a radiographic study in the canine mandible.微间隙大小对非潜入式牙种植体嵴顶骨水平的影响:犬下颌骨的影像学研究
J Periodontol. 2002 Oct;73(10):1111-7. doi: 10.1902/jop.2002.73.10.1111.
6
In-patient comparison of immediate and conventional loaded implants in mandibular molar sites within 12 months.12个月内下颌磨牙部位即刻负重种植体与传统负重种植体的住院患者比较。
Clin Oral Implants Res. 2008 Apr;19(4):335-41. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2007.01471.x. Epub 2008 Feb 20.
7
A 10-year prospective study of ITI dental implants placed in the posterior region. II: Influence of the crown-to-implant ratio and different prosthetic treatment modalities on crestal bone loss.一项关于植入后牙区的ITI种植牙的10年前瞻性研究。II:冠根比及不同修复治疗方式对牙槽嵴骨吸收的影响
Clin Oral Implants Res. 2007 Dec;18(6):707-14. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2006.01307.x. Epub 2007 Aug 13.
8
Resonance frequency analysis assessment of implant stability in labial onlay grafted posterior mandibles: a pilot clinical study.唇侧嵌体移植后下颌骨植入物稳定性的共振频率分析评估:一项初步临床研究。
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2007 Mar-Apr;22(2):235-42.
9
A 10-year prospective study of ITI dental implants placed in the posterior region. I: Clinical and radiographic results.对植入后牙区的ITI种植牙进行的10年前瞻性研究。I:临床和影像学结果。
Clin Oral Implants Res. 2007 Dec;18(6):699-706. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2006.01306.x.
10
Immediate and early loading of oxidized tapered implants in the partially edentulous maxilla: a 1-year prospective clinical, radiographic, and resonance frequency analysis study.上颌部分牙列缺损中氧化锥形种植体的即刻和早期负重:一项为期1年的前瞻性临床、影像学和共振频率分析研究。
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2009 Jun;11(2):69-80. doi: 10.1111/j.1708-8208.2008.00096.x. Epub 2008 Apr 1.

引用本文的文献

1
What Is the Survival Rate of Implants Loaded Immediately with a Branemark Protocol Prosthesis? A Review.采用Branemark系统种植体即刻负重修复的生存率是多少?一篇综述。
Eur J Dent. 2025 Feb;19(1):7-14. doi: 10.1055/s-0044-1787818. Epub 2024 Jul 16.
2
Influence of torque and bone type on stability quotient of two implant platforms: a clinical trial.扭矩和骨类型对两种种植体平台稳定性系数的影响:一项临床试验。
Braz Oral Res. 2024 Jun 24;38:e049. doi: 10.1590/1807-3107bor-2024.vol38.0049. eCollection 2024.
3
Three-Year Retrospective Comparative Study between Implants with Same Body-Design but Different Crest Module Configurations.
相同主体设计但不同牙嵴模块配置的种植体之间的三年回顾性比较研究
Dent J (Basel). 2020 Dec 15;8(4):135. doi: 10.3390/dj8040135.
4
Repeatability of the resonance frequency analysis values in implants with a new technology.新型种植体的共振频率分析值具有可重复性。
Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal. 2019 Sep 1;24(5):e636-e642. doi: 10.4317/medoral.22761.
5
Radiographic evaluation of conical tapered platform-switched implants in the posterior mandible: 1-year results of a two-center prospective study.下颌后牙区锥形渐缩式平台转换种植体的影像学评估:一项双中心前瞻性研究的1年结果
Clin Oral Implants Res. 2016 Jun;27(6):686-93. doi: 10.1111/clr.12644. Epub 2015 Jun 21.
6
Impact of platform switching on marginal peri-implant bone-level changes. A systematic review and meta-analysis.平台转换对种植体周围边缘骨水平变化的影响。一项系统评价与Meta分析。
Clin Oral Implants Res. 2015 Mar;26(3):342-58. doi: 10.1111/clr.12339. Epub 2014 Jan 20.